Competitive Moves Flashcards

1
Q

When is a Competitive Environment Oligopolistic?

A

When the nature of a Firm’s competitive strategy depends, to a large extent, on its Rivals’ potential reactions.

The more rivalrous and unstable an Industry, the worse this becomes.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 126.

In such environments, poor reactions by Rivals, even weaker ones, can make sound moves unsuccessful. Thus, Rivals must be conditioned to respond favourably.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which Competitive Moves are the most effective in an Oligopolistic Environment?

A

Those whose outcome is determined quickly and most favours the Firm.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 130.

One especially opportune outcome is favourably influencing the Schelling Point, i.e. the competitive equilibrium.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When may Forcefulness be the correct Tactical Approach?

A

When the Firm’s capabilities are:

  • Clearly superior;
  • Perceived as such by Rivals; and
  • Can be so maintained well into the forceful move.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 130.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When may Forcefulness be the incorrect Tactical Approach?

A

When the Firm’s Rivals are:

  • Irrational or desperate;
  • Pursuing greatly different objectives; or
  • Capable of successfully waging a war of attrition.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 130.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When may Finesse be the correct Tactical Approach?

A

When the Firm:

  • Lacks the power to comfortably use brute force; or
  • Conciliatory moves are available.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 130.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a Conciliatory Move?

A

A move that improves the Firm’s position:

  • And Rivals’ positions, even if they do not match it;
  • And Rivals’ positions, but only if a large sum of them match it; or
  • Because Rivals view it as non-threatening and thus do not match it.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 131.

Proper signalling is essential for communicating conciliatory intentions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does a Firm estimate the probability of its Rivals matching a Conciliatory Move?

A
  • Assess the Move’s impact on every major Rival; and
  • The costs and benefits they may derive from cooperating and deviating.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 131.

The risk of deviation is diminished if the Move can be cheaply rescinded or if its effects are slow and redressable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does a Firm evaluate the prospect of Retaliation to a Competitive Move?

A

By assessing its:

  • Efficacy.
  • Intensity.
  • Timeframe.
  • Probability.
  • Influenceability.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 134.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Retaliatory Lag?

A

The amount of time between a Move and Rivals’ effective retaliation thereto.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 134.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which Factors influence Retaliatory Lag?

A
  • Perception: Rivals’ ability to detect the Move and perceive it as a threat.
  • Counterattack Formulation: Rivals’ ability to understand the Move and how best to defeat it.
  • Counterattack Execution: Rivals’ ability to rapidly nullify the Move.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 134.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can a Firm increase Retaliatory Lag by undermining Perception?

A
  • Perserve strategic secrecy.
  • Use diversionary tactics, like misinformation or Red Herrings.
  • Execute the Move quietly, usually in small or foreign markets.
  • Hide in plain sight by leveraging Rivals’ goals and assumptions.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 134.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can a Firm increase Retaliatory Lag by undermining Counterattack Formation?

A
  • Exploit internal weaknesses.
  • Pit essential objectives into conflict with one another.
  • Force disproportionate retaliatory costs, usually by forcing imprecise solutions to precise problems.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 135-136.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can a Firm increase Retaliatory Lag by undermining Counterattack Execution?

A

Force solutions that require long timeframes to implement.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 135.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What makes a Retaliatory Move an effective Disciplinary Mechanism?

A

Precision toward the Initiator; generality disperses discipline, decreasing its efficacy or collaterly damaging neutral parties.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 138.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In any Competitive Move, Offensive or Defensive, what is the most important consideration?

A

Commitment, i.e. an unequivocal signal of the Firm’s intentions and resources, one made stronger by its degree of bindingness and irreversibility.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 140.

Commitment influences how Firms perceive their position and those of their Rivals, and can help predict the likelihood, speed, and vigor of a Move and any retaliation thereto.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the Three Types of Commitment?

A
  • Offensive: The Firm commits to executing an action, deterring retaliation by signalling hostility.
  • Defensive: The Firm commits to retaliate against an action, deterring threats by signalling hostility.
  • Neutral: The Firm commits to impartiality regarding an action, building trust and reducing tensions.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 141.

17
Q

How is a credible Commitment signalled?

A

The Firm must show its Rivals that it has:

  • The intention to execute its Commitment;
  • The inability to back down therefrom;
  • The means to quickly and forcefully execute; and
  • The ability to detect noncompliance with its terms.

Porter, Competitive Strategy — P. 142.