Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

whren v us

A

if traffic stop is valid, (reasonable suspicion) the true motivation of the officers is irrelevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

tennessee v garner

A

deadly force to stop a fleeing unarmed felon is unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

gerstein v pugh

A

prompt timely hearing - arrested without a warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

payton v new york

A

cannot make dynamic entry for a warrantless, felony arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

county of riverside v mclaughlin

A

48 hour hearing after arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

maryland v garrison

A

good faith exception for search warrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

wilson v arkansas

A

knock and announce is subject to exceptions based on LE interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

richards v wisconsin

A

no blanket exception to knock and announce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

scott v harris

A

use of force to stop a fleeing vehicle that poses a major risk of serious physical injury to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

garrity v new jersey

A

officers 5th amendment rights- use of coerced statements prohibited in court if job is threatened- police officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

miranda v arizona

A

protects defendants 5th amendment rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

pennsylvania v bruder

A

miranda not required during traffic stops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

new york v quarles

A

public safety exception statements are valid without miranda- suspect in custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

edwards v arizona

A

interrogations can be resumed after talking with lawyer, or released and recontacted 14 days later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

arizona v roberson

A

invoking miranda to one offense, also invokes miranda to any other unrelated offenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

us v hale

A

a defendants silence at time of arrest cannot be used against him or her even for impeachment purposes

17
Q

moore v illinois

A

defendants have a 6th amendment right to attorney at the time that adversarial criminal proceedings have been initiated

18
Q

state v dubose

A

showups are unduly suggestive

19
Q

atwater v city of lago vista

A

officer may arrest an individual without violating 4th amend if there is probable cause to believe offender has committed even a very minor offense

20
Q

mapp v ohio

A

applied exclusionary rule to the states

21
Q

griffin v wisconsin

A

warrantless search of probationers home by state probation officers does not violate 4th amendment. requires reasonable grounds that contraband is present

22
Q

gideon v wainwright

A

right to attorney at every critical stage of proceeding

23
Q

brady v maryland

A

prosecutor has a duty to disclose evidence favorable to a defendant. failure violates due process

24
Q

arizona v gant

A

sia if:
reaching distance of passenger compartment at time of search

*reasonably believe vehicle contains evidence of arrest

25
Q

wade-gibbert rule

A

a suspect in a lineup or other confrontation is entitled to have a lawyer present

26
Q

legal source- miranda

A

5th amendment

27
Q

3 reasons officers lose jobs

A

excessive force, wrongful death, false arrest

28
Q

search everyone at scene of search warrant

A

no- otherwise list on warrant to search all

29
Q

serving warrants

A

knock, identify, purpose