Crime & Punishment Flashcards
Utilitarianism - Theories of Punishment
- Utilitarianism (forward-looking):
a) general deterrence: D punished to convince gen. community (potential criminals) not to commit crime
b) specific deterrence: D punished so he won’t commit future crimes
imprisonment prevents D from committing more crimes and reforms wrongdoer
Retributivism - Theories of Punishment
Retributivism (backward-looking): People who voluntarily commit crimes deserve punishment. Punishment takes something from D and makes society whole again. Ex) Dudley v. Stephens - guilty of murder bc boy did not consent to being killed
Proportionality of Punishment - How Do We Punish?
Punishment must be proportionate to the crime; cannot be cruel or unusual (8th amendment). Ex) Coker v. GA -escaped murder rapist. Death penalty is disproportional from the crime of rape
Legality of Punishment - How Do We Punish?
No crime without the law, no punishment without the law.
- Crim stat. should be understandable to reasonable law abiding persons (LEX CERTA)
- Stat. should be crafted so they do not delegate basic policy matters to police, judge, jury for resolution on ad hoc/subjective basis (Desertrain/homeless CA)
- Lenity doctrine: judicial interpretation of ambiguous statutes should be biased in favor of the accused.
conduct must be previously defined otherwise a violation of due process.
EX POST FACTO - cannot apply stat backwards
ex) Keeler: fetus killer; courts cannot create or enlarge on a stat. Stat says killing of a human, not fetus.
what is Statutory Clarity?
Courts must give stat its plain and definite meaning, if unclear -> legislative intent
ex) Chicago v. Morales - loitering ordinance to prevent gang activity = too vague and unconstitutional for lack of clarity
Statutory Interpretation - Looks at:
- legislative intent
then: dictionary meaning, interpretation following precedent, word harmonizing with the statute, etc.