Crimes of the powerful Flashcards

1
Q

White collar and corporate crime

A
  • Defined as a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status
  • Sutherland, 2 different types of crime:
    1. Occupational: committed by employees against the organisation for which they work
    2. Corporate: committed by employees for their organisation in pursuit of its goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The scale and types of corporate crime

A
  • One estimate puts the cost of white collar crimes in the USA at over 10x that of ordinary crimes
  • Tombs (2013): corporate crime has enormous costs, physical, environmental, economic
  • Corporate crime covers a wide range of acts and omissions, including:
    1. Financial crimes- tax evasion, money laundering
    2. Crimes against consumers- false labelling
    3. Crimes against employees- sexual and racial discrimination
    4. Crimes against the environment
    5. State-corporate crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The abuse of trust

A
  • Carrabine et al (2014): we entrust high-status professionals with our finances, our health, security, personal info…
  • KPMG: committed tax fraud and were given a fine of $456m
  • Accountants and lawyers can be employed by criminal organisations which may result in the inflation of fees, committing forgery…
  • Harold Shipman case: believed to have murdered over 200 of his patients
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The invisibility of corporate crime

A

Reasons why:

  1. The media:
    - Very little coverage of corporate crime, which reinforces the stereotype that crime is a w/c phenomenon
    - They describe corporate crime in sanitised language: embezzlement = ‘accounting irregularities’
  2. Lack of political will:
    - Politicians’ rhetoric of being ‘tough on crime’ is focused on street crime
    - Home Office uses crime surveys to discover the true extent of ‘ordinary crime’, not corporate crime
  3. Complex corporate crime:
    - Law enforcement is understaffed, under-resourced and lacking technical expertise
  4. De-labelling:
    - Corporate crime is consistently filtered out from the process of criminalisation
    - Penalties are often fines rather than jail..
  5. Under-reporting
    - No specific victim
    - Not regarded as a ‘real’ crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Partial visibility

A
  • Since the financial crisis of 20118, corporate crime has become more visible
  • Campaigns such as Occupy and UK Uncut are against corporate tax avoidance and investigate journalists and the media…]
  • Neoliberal policies: marketisation and privatisation of public services mean that large corporations are much more involved in people’s lives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explanations of corporate crime

A
  1. Strain theory:
    - Box (1983): if a company can’t achieve its goal of maximising profit by legal means, it may employ illegal ones instead
  2. Differential association:
    - Sutherland (1949): crime is behaviour that we have learned from others in a social context
    - If a company’s culture justifies committing crimes to achieve corporate goals, employees will be socialised into this criminality
    - Link to 2 other concepts:
    a) deviant subcultures
    b) techniques of neutralisation
  3. Labelling theory:
    - Nelken (2012): corporations have the ability to avoid labelling
    - They can buy lawyers and accountants
  4. Marxism:
    - Because the goal of capitalism is to maximise profits, it inevitably causes harm
    - Box (1983): mystification: the ideology is spread that corporate crime is less widespread or harmful than w/c crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation

A
  • The strain theory and Marxism overpredict the amount of business crime
  • Doesn’t explain the crime in non-profit making state agencies such as the police
  • Braithwaite (1984): law abiding is more profitable than law breaking, case study of US pharmaceutical companies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly