Crises and bailouts Flashcards

1
Q

Which model states that government guarantees ensure stability of financial system?

A

The Diamond-Dybvig model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which model states that government guarantees lead to moral hazard?

A

The Kareken-Wallace model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State the three basic assumptions of the Diamond Dybvig-model

A
  • Some agents experience liquidity shocks (leading them to consume impatiently)
  • Production technology is risk free but involve illiquid assets
  • Banks transform illiquid assets into liquid deposits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can an agent to, in the Diamond-Dybvig model

A

Period 0
♠ decide whether to invest in the production technology or to deposit in a bank.

Period 1
♠ observe one’s liquidity shock
♠ decide on investment termination and deposit withdrawals
♠ if going to the bank – a random position in the bank queue
♠ consumption and storage decision

Period 2
♠ liquidate remaining investments and deposits ♠ consumption decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the expected utility of investing in the production technology (in the Diamond-Dybvig model)?

A

Probability (type 1) × goods × MU + Probability (type 2) × goods × MU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State the formulas for “goods” that the bank must promise for people to use the bank (in the Diamond-Dybvig model)?

A

For impatient customers: good = q = bank’s promised return = goods returned from technology (= 1.5 in example)

For patient customers:
(Technology return period 2 * (q * (W/D))) / 1 - (W/D)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the proportion of successful withdrawals in case of a bank run?

A

W* / D = 1 / q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the expected utility in case of a bank run?

A

Proportion of successful withdrawals * (bank’s original utility function BUT with patient customers receiving the same number of goods as the impatient customers (1.5 in example))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do you find the acceptable probability of a bank-run?

A

Call the probability π, use π and 1-π to calculate expected value of having the bank with or without bank run, make it an inequality in relation to expected value of technology, then solve for π

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Remedies to bank runs

A

The government can offer deposit insurance – guaranteeing a gross return equal to q.

Banks can suspend convertibility if more than (0.5 D) depositors show up and want to withdraw in period 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name two basic assumptions of the Kareken-Wallace model

A
  • No information asymmetries

* Complete markets – trade in state-contingent claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What formula describes the no-arbitrage condition in the Kareken-Wallace model?

A

P(A) + P(B) = 1 / (1+R)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

State the bank’s budget constraint in the Kareken-Wallace model

A

P(A) * Q(A) + P(B) * Q(B) = D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State the banks basic profit formula in the Kareken-Wallace model

A

Profit = max{Q(S) – (1+r) D , 0 }

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State the formula for the value of Qbar in the Kareken-Wallace model

A

Qbar = D / (P(A) + P(B))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

State the formula for the bank’s expected profit in the Kareken-Wallace model

A

= π(A) × max{Q(A) –(1+r)D, 0} + π(B) × max{Q(B) –(1+r)D, 0}

17
Q

Why can you not simultaneously be in favor of the Kareken-Wallace model and the Diamond-Dybvig model?

A

Because the deposit insurance proposed by Diamond-Dybvig to avoid bank runs may distort investment incentives, as Kareken-Wallace point out