Easements Flashcards

1
Q

Easement Definition

A

Right held by one person to make use of another person’s land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Servient Estate

A

Land burdened by the easement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dominate Estate

A

Land benefited by the easement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Affirmative Easement

A

The holder has the right to od something on someone else’s property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Negative Easement

A

The holder has the right to prevent someone form doing something on their land.

MUST BE EXPRESS!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Easement Appurtenant

A

The easement is tied to the use of the land

Key word: USE! Not to do… use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Easement in Gross

A

The easement benefits the holder personally

Note: there is no dominate estate, just servient estate.

Pool example

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Creating Easement Methods

A

Express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Express Easement

A

Subject to SOF - must be in writing

Can be given by grant or reservation

SUBJECT TO RECORDING STATUTES!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Easement by reservation

A

Is created when a grantor conveys land but reserves an easement right in the land for the grantor’s use and benefit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Implied easement characteristics

A
  1. Informal, rise out of factual circumstances
  2. Transferable
  3. Not subject to SOF
  4. Not subject to recording statutes unless subsequent purchaser had notice of easement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kinds of implied easements

A
  1. Necessity
  2. Implication
  3. Prescription (AP)
  4. Estoppel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Implied easement by necessity

A

Created only when property is virtually useless

Example: landlock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Implied easement conditions

A
  1. Common ownership: dominant and servant estates were owned common by one person
  2. Necessity at severance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Common ownership

A

dominant and servant estates were owned common by one person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Necessity at severance

A

when the estates were severed into two separate estates, one of the properties became virtually useless without an easement

Not in the strict sense… ends when no longer necessary

17
Q

Implied easement by implication

A

An easement by implication is created by an existing use on a property

18
Q

Implied easement by implicationConditions

A
  1. Common ownership: large estate owned by one person
  2. Before severance: owner of the large estate uses the land as if there’s an easement on it.
  3. After Severance: use must be continuous and apparent at time of severance
  4. Necessity: use must be reasonably necessary tot he dominant estate’s use and enjoyment
19
Q

Implied easement by prescription

A

Similar to acquiring an easement by adverse possession

Differences: AP is about possession, where easement is about USE. All elements are the same except for exclusivity

20
Q

Easement by Estoppel

A

Creation: starts with a permissive use (license)

Reliance: Continues when the second neighbor relies on the first neighbors promise (promise that second neighbor can use the land) - must be reasonable and in good faith (look for facts where second neighbor invested money to rely… improvements)

Permission withdrawn: finally, the first neighbor withdraws

Result: if reliance was detrimental to second neighbor, fist neighbor is estopped frm withdrawing permission, in effect creating an easement.

21
Q

Scope: ambiguous terms

A

if the terms are ambiguous, the court considers the intent of the original parties as to the purpose of the easement

22
Q

Scope: changes in use

A

Changes in use of an easement are tested under reasonableness standard. Presume the parties contemplated both its current use and its future use, which means the future use of an easement must be reasonably foreseeable

23
Q

Scope: tresspass

A

If the use exceeds the scope, it will be considered trespassing

24
Q

Duty to maintain

A

The owner of the easement has the duty to maintain (dominate estate holder)

25
Q

Termination

A

Release
1. Holder of the easement expressly releases it
2. Release must be in writing

Merger: An easement is terminated if the owner of the easement acquires fee title to the underlying estate. The easement merges into the title.

26
Q

Abandonment

A

The owner acts in an affirmative way that shows a clear intent to relinquish the right

Requires more than non-use or a statement

27
Q

Abandonment of prescription easement

A

The holder fails to protect against the servient estate owner’s interference for the statutory period
It is the interference of a servient estate owner that is continuous, actual, open, and hostile for a specific period which may cause an easement right to be terminated by prescription, as illustrated in the following example.

Example:Millhouse has an easement to use the path along Lulu’s property. Lulu hates Millhouse and no longer wants him on her property. She puts up a fence to block Millhouse’s access to the path. If the path is blocked for the statutory period, will Millhouse’s easement be terminated?

28
Q

End of necessity

A

An easement by necessity lasts as long as the easement is needed. If it is no longer necessary, the easement ends.