emancipation of serfs Flashcards
1
Q
emancipation edict 1861
A
- affected only privately owned serfs (51mill)
- serfs free to marry whoever they wished, own property & set up business
- landowners compensated by state immediately
- freed serfs to pay back redemption payments to serfs for 49 years including interest at 6%
- only when these paid would they have legal title to their land
- could continue to work 30/40 days per year on lord’s land to pay off redemption
- local mir responsible for paying redemption & peasant could only leave mir after paid off tax
- state peasants received better treatment but had to wait till 1866 for their freedom
2
Q
motives - crimean war
A
- drew attention to state of army where they were mainly made up of peasants (many serfs)
- enlistment mandatory for 25yrs but could be reduced to 15 for good character & if survived given freedom
- military reformers believed they needed a smaller better trained army
- officials convinced military reforms could only be done if serfdom abolished
- ONLY A SHORT TERM CAUSE
3
Q
motives - moral case
A
- members of royal family considered serfdom was morally & ethically wrong
- nicholas I admitted it was evil & palpable
- enlightened nobles & liberal state officials came to accept view that it was wrong to own someone like a possession
- majority of nobles didn’t accept this position as thought abolition of serfdom would be damaging to russian state & own livelihoods
4
Q
motives - risk of revolt
A
- serious peasant revolts in past & disturbances increasing since 1840s
- 1467 uprisings since 1800
- worrying as army was mainly made up of peasants
- may be difficult for government to contain major peasant uprising
- tsar worried enough to order weekly reports on mood of peasantry from december 1857
- other historians say this number was exaggerated
5
Q
motives - economic reasons
A
- many enlightened government officials/intellectuals convinced it was necessary to abolish serfdom if russian economy was to advance
- some of them accepted arguments of economists that free labour was more productive than forced labour
- forced labour impoverished the population & stopped growth of domestic demand which was essential for economic growth
- belied they needed free labour market where peasants could move around where most productive either in agriculture of industry