Environmental Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Some philosophers argue that “ought” does not logically follow from “is”. What do they mean? Use an
example to explain it

A

This means that just because something is a certain way (“is”), it doesn’t automatically mean it should be that way “ought” statement).
Example- It is raining outside- Just because it is raining outside doesn’t mean you ought to take an umbrella.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between Intrinsic values and instrumental values? Use an example to explain your
answer

A

Intrinsic values- refer to the inherent worth of something
Instrumental values - refer to the value something has because of its usefulness or usefulness to achieve a goal.
For example- The tree has intrinsic value because it is part of the natural environment and contributes to the ecosystem. : The tree also has instrumental value because humans can use it for various purposes, such as providing shade, producing oxygen, or supplying wood for building furniture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does it mean to say something is “morally considerable”?

A

Something is morally considerable when it matters morally and It is worthy of moral attention or consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between objective and subjective values? Use an example to explain your answer.

A

Objective values- are based on external standards or criteria that apply universally

subjective values- are based on personal opinions, feelings, or preferences that vary from person to person.
Example- The value of human life is often considered an objective value. The value of a particular piece of artwork is often considered a subjective value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Some argue that we can only assign instrumental and subjective values to the natural world. Please identify
at least three types of instrumental values they assign to the natural world.

A

When they argue this they mean that humans decide to use nature for other things and their own benefits which is an instrumental value, and appreciate nature for what it’s worth which is a subjective value. For example, we view nature as something for money, food, water, and entertainment. We view nature as something to fulfill our needs rather than valuing nature for what it is worth and its own sake.

3 instrumental values that they assign to the natural world are recreational values, educational values, and personal values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ronald Dworkin argues that humans are sacred and inviolable, that is, they have intrinsic value. What does
he mean by this? Explain it.

A

He means that every individual has worth and dignity just by simply being human, and this worth should be respected and protected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is “anthropocentrism”? (Please make sure to explain how this approach determines “moral
considerability.

A

Anthro- is the belief that all humans are the most important beings in the world and are directly morally considerable. An approach is how something affects human interests when determining its moral significance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

As an objection to the “genotype criterion” for biological group membership, we discussed the problem of
“indeterminacy” or “arbitrariness” (the case of gradual transformation of a chimpanzee to a human being.)
Please explain the objection.

A

if we rely solely on genetic differences to define species membership, it becomes unclear where to draw the line between different species, especially when considering gradual changes over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

As an objection to the “genotype criterion” for biological group membership, we discussed the problem of
the “super-chimp” (or as we called it, “Professor Chimp ‘’) case. Please explain the objection.

A

The problem with the genotype criterion is that it assumes all individuals within a species share the same genetic makeup and traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Some use “interbreeding criterion” as a criterion for biological group membership. (a) Explain the criterion.
(b) Discuss one major objection to this criterion

A

individuals belong to the same biological group if they can mate and produce viable offspring that can also reproduce.

One major objection is loss to genetic diversity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is “ratiocentrism”? What concept of “reason” is associated with ratiocentrism? Explain it

A

It is that adult humans deserve moral consideration because they are rational. The concept is classical logic and empirical inquiry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why do some philosophers think that infants and severely mentally disabled undermine ratiocentrism?
Explain it

A

Because they do not have the same thought process and cognitive abilities as ratiocentric anthropocentrism.

The objection is that it excludes certain people from moral consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the “last person” objection against ratiocentrism?

A

The “last person” objection is that even though humans are the most important things, we still should not prioritize our interests above all else. We need to think about the well-being of all creatures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the “inadequacy objection” against anthropocentrism?

A

Any argument against an environmental ethic that it will not provide an adequate for environmentally sustainable practices, policies, and lifestyles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the principle of “species impartiality”

A

That all living beings have the same inherent worth, and must be treated as such.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is “Enlightened Anthropocentrism”

A

A viewpoint that says humans are really important, but we also need to consider the well-being of other living things and the environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is APA’s view on technology? Discuss one objection to their view on technology.

A

APA sees technology as a means to enhance human well-being, and improve quality of life. That tech has instrumental value.

One objection to the APA view on technology is the potential consequences of technological advancement on non-human beings and the environment.

10
Q

When it comes to the matter of efficiency, the EA identifies at least 5 interrelated ways the APA misuses
environmental resources. What are these ways of misuse? Briefly explain them

A

Overconsumption- when resources used in wasteful ways

Climate change- Burning of fossils fuels and greenhouse

Resource depletion- exploiting natural resources

Pollution- Apa like short terms gains which can cause pollution

Habitat destruction- Exploiting. natural habitats.

10
Q

What is “Actual Preference Anthropocentrism”

A

The view that people should treat the environment and manage natural resources in whatever ways best satisfy people’s actual or current preferences

10
Q

What is the idea of “Triple Bottom Line” as an idea for sustainable development? Briefly explain it

A

It measures an organization’s social, environmental, & financial performance.

10
Q

The advocates of EA widely agreed that the interests of future generations need to be taken into account
when evaluating environmental practices and policies. However, this idea faces some problems. In this
regard, (a) what is “indeterminacy and contingency problem”? (b) What is “nonidentity problem”

A

“indeterminacy and contingency problem”- situations where it’s difficult to predict outcomes because they depend on many uncertain factors or chance events.

nonidentity problem”- s problem that comes with considering actions that affect future generations.

11
Q

What is the Rawlsian (contractarianist) response to non- identity problem? (Make sure to identify Rawls’
“just saving” requirements we need to follow with respect to the future generations.

A

Rawls suggests that when making decisions for future generations, we should imagine ourselves behind a “veil of ignorance where we don’t know the circumstances we will have in the future like our race, gender, or socioeconomic status.

With just saving in mind, Rawls suggests that we have a duty to ensure that future generations get a world that is at least as good as the one we had.

12
Q

What is “sentientism”?

A

Sentientism is the view that all beings who can feel pain, and pleasure, or emotion have inherent worth.

13
Q

What is Peter Singer’s extensionist argument for sentientism? Explain it

A

That human beings have interests that we ought to care about.

there is no moral difference between humans and nonhuman animals that would justify considering human interests and not the interests of nonhumans.

14
Q

What is Thomas Regan’s extensionist argument for sentientism? Explain it.

A

His is to Specifically identify what it is about human beings that make us directly morally considerable and then see if any nonhumans apply to the criteria.

15
Q

It is sometimes questioned whether animals really experience suffering. What is their argument for it?

A

the argument is grounded in their capacity to feel pain and distress, which is similar to humans.

16
Q

Some philosophers argue that plants are not directly morally considerable. Present one of their arguments
for this claim

A

They argue that plants don’t have thoughts, feelings, or awareness in the way that humans and some other animals do. Therefore, they are not directly morally considerable

17
Q

The most common explanation for what grounds the interests of nonconscious organisms (including plants)
is that they are “goal-directed systems”. What does it mean? Explain it

A

Goal-directed systems for non-conscious organisms are processes that help non-conscious organisms survive or live without conscious awareness. A plant for example has no brain or consciousness but still behaves in a way to survive and thrive.

18
Q

What is Peter Singer’s argument on why we should care about the interests of plants? (Make sure to discuss
the distinction between “psychological” and “biological” needs/interests and why and how this distinction
is relevant to plants being directly morally considerable

A

Singer might argue that plants do not have psychological needs in the same way that sentient beings do because they don’t have a brain or central nervous system

however, biological needs because of sunlight, water, and nutrients to grow and reproduce.

Singer says we should still care for plants because of their instrumental role for sentient beings.

19
Q

What is “biocentrism”

A

that all living things and life forms have interests that are directly morally considerable and have inherent worth.

20
Q

Explain four principles of biocentric ethics.

A

non-maleficence- No harm to living beings

noninterference- not interfering with an organism’s pursuit of its own goals.

fidelity- faithfulness or loyalty to the natural world.

restitutive justice- that humans make restitution to living beings when they have been harmed by human activity.

21
Q

What is communitarian ethics? Why do they give priority to the community as directly morally
considerable?

A

The connection between the individual and the community. They give priority because of the importance of collective well-being and the relationships that bind individuals together within a community.

22
Q

What is “ecocentrism”?

A

Ecocentrism is a belief that sees nature as really important and valuable, not just because of how it helps humans, but because nature has value in itself.

23
Q

How is “ecocentrism” or “Land Ethic” different from anthropocentrism, sentientism, and biocentrism?
Explain it.

A

Because anthropocentrism focuses only on humans, sentientism extends moral consideration to all beings capable of feeling pleasure and pain. Biocentrism broadens this to include all living organisms. While, ecocentrism goes even further by considering the health and balance of entire ecosystems.

24
Q

What is the guiding moral principle according to Leopol’s land ethic?

A

Leopold proposed that humans should expand their moral community to include not only other human beings but also the land and all its inhabitants, including plants, animals, and ecosystems.

25
Q

What is Leopold’s argument for ecocentrism?

A

Instead of thinking that we as human beings are superior over the land community, he insists we are plain members and citizens of the Earth.

26
Q

What is “pragmatic holism”? How is it different from “ecocentrism” or “Land Ethic”?

A

Is about looking at the big picture when trying to understand or solve problems.

Pragmatic holism is looking at the bigger picture to solve problems, while ecocentrism is an ethical view that prioritizes the value of the environment.

27
Q

Discuss at least four implications of the land ethic

A
  1. Respect for nature- treat nature with care and respect
  2. Stewardship- use natural resources in sustainable ways
  3. Understanding
    interconnectedness- actions taken to land can affect other parts of land
  4. promoting biodiversity- need to protect and restore habitats
28
Q

What is “ecofascism” or “environmental fascism”, according to Thomas Regan as an objection to the land
ethic? Explain it

A

It is people who combine environmentalism with fascism. Regan argues that while it’s important to care for the environment, we must be cautious not to let this concern lead to harmful and oppressive actions.

29
Q

Some critics of the land ethic argue that the central concepts in the land ethic are too vague. What do they
mean by that? Use an example to explain your answer

A

They mean that the concepts lack clarity and precision making it hard to understand how it should be applied. Ecological integrity is a good example because ecological integrity has no specific criteria just like land ethics.