EXAM 1 Flashcards

1
Q

History of Psychology

A

The word “Psychology” comes from the 2 Greek words for “soul” (PSYCHE) and “study” (LOGOS).

The word has been around since the 16th century, however, psychology was not until the 1800’s that it became recognized as a SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE.

Psychology really has its ROOTS in both PHYSIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY and can be seen, even today, as a kind of MIXTURE of these two disciplines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WILHELM WUNDT (1832-1920)

A

Commonly credited with being the “founder of Psychology.”

He was a physiologist originally who established the first psychological research laboratory at the University of Leipzig in Germany in 1879.

Under Wundt’s direction, Psychology took on the definition of the “scientific study of the conscious experience.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

STANLEY HALL (1846-1924)

A

Student of Wilhelm Wundt.

Brought Psychology to America by establishing America’s first psychological RESEARCH LABORATORY at John Hopkins University in 1883.

Established America’s first psychology JOURNAL and became the founder of the now well-known and well-established American Psychological Association (APA).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

STRUCTURALISM

A

EDWARD TITCHNER

Student of Wilhelm Wundt.

Immigrated with STRUCTURALISM to the United States, where it flourished and became locked in battle with another school of thought, known as FUNCTIONALISM.

Structuralism is based on the “notion that the task of psychology is to analyze consciousness into its basic elements and investigate how these elements are related.”

Edward Titchener was heavily influenced by the PHYSICISTS of the time who were attempting to break down matter into its component parts.

Structuralism relied on INTROSPECTION as its primary means of determining the basic “particles” of conscious thought. Introspection: “the careful, systematic self-observation of one’s own conscious experience.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FUNCTIONALISM

A

WILLIAM JAMES (1842-1910)

Functionalism is based on “the belief that psychology should investigate the function or purpose of consciousness, rather than its structure.”

William James was heavily influenced by what was going on in BIOLOGY at the time, in particular, by the teaching of Charles Darwin, who was proposing his concept of NATURAL SELECTION. Natural selection: is the idea that “characteristics that provide a survival advantage are more likely to be passed on to subsequent generations and thus come to be selected over time.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

BEHAVIOURISM

A

JOHN WATSON (1878-1958).

Behaviourism proposes that “scientific psychology should study only observable behaviour.”

In a nutshell, Watson was urging scientists to ABANDON the study of consciousness entirely and focus instead on only those behaviours which were OBSERVABLE, claiming that only those things which can be OBJECTIVELY OBSERVED AND MEASURED, can be studied scientifically.

Watson went on to make the then RADICAL CLAIM that our behaviours are determined almost exclusively by EXPERIENCE and not by HEREDITY.

Watson was quoted as saying:

“Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own special world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select—doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief, and yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations and race of his ancestors.”

Watson essentially said that we are shaped solely by our experiences and not at all by our biological constitution.

the NATURE VS NURTURE DEBATE was born—which has more influence on our psychological development: Our genetic make-up (nature) or our life circumstances (nurture).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

GESTALT PSYCHOLOGY

A

MAX WERTHEIMER (1880 - 1943)

Emerged as a reaction to the breakdown philosophy of structuralism.

While structuralists were trying to break down the experiences into their elemental parts, Gestalt psychologists were focused on the whole experience, claiming that that the “whole is greater than the sum of its parts” This is referred to as SYNERGISM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Psychoanalysis (also referred to as Psychoanalytic Theory or Psychodynamic Theory)

A

SIGMUND FREUD (1856-1939)

Freud brought us the PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY. His ideas were “out of the norm” and consequently, Freud’s ideas were met with considerable reluctance.

Freud was originally a PHYSICIAN, and his theory of psychoanalysis came from his experiences treating patients with psychological problems, including those with OBSESSIONS AND COMPULSIONS, IRRATIONAL FEARS (phobias) and other ANXIETIES and concerns.

According to Freud, we are motivated to behave in particular ways due in large part to the URGINGS of our UNCONSCIOUS. The unconscious refers to that aspect of ourselves which is not under our conscious control or awareness, but nonetheless contributes to our behaviours.

Freud went on to propose that much of our behaviour is governed by our SEXUAL URGES.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

B. F. SKINNER (1904-1990)

A

B.F. Skinner endeavored to return behaviourism to a STRICTER FOCUS on OBSERVABLE behaviour once again.

Skinner made the cover of Time Life Magazine in 1971.

Skinner proposed that “all behaviour is governed by external stimuli”… and has nothing to do with our conscious decisions.

Skinner concluded that there was no such thing as FREE WILL. Skinner, like Freud, endured much criticism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HUMANISM

A

CARL ROGERS (1902-1987) & ABRAHAM MASLOW (1908-1970)

Humanism developed in large part as a back lash against Psychoanalysis and Behaviourism. Both schools of thought were seen as DEHUMANIZING (not hard to understand, given that Freud claimed that our behaviours were the product of our unconscious selves and Skinner claimed that there was no such thing as free will!)

Humanism emphasizes the unique qualities of humans, particularly our freedom and potential for personal growth.

Humanists argue that what determines our behaviours stems largely from our own personal self-concepts, our individual need to fulfill our potentials and evolve as individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4 major “SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT”

A

STRUCTURALISM
FUNCTIONALISM
BEHAVIOURISM
HUMANISM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

6 major perspectives on human behaviour typically identified as ‘modern day psychological perspectives.’

A
Psychodynamic Perspective
Behavioural Perspective
Humanistic Perspective
Cognitive Perspective
Sociocultural Perspective
Biological Perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DEFINITION OF PSYCHOLOGY

A

Psychology is the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION of human behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD

A

SCIENTISTS and STUDENTS who FORMALLY PRACTISE and STUDY psychology are REQUIRED to conduct their observations in a way that is FREE OF BIAS and be JUSTIFIED by something BEYOND simply their OPINIONS. They are required to EMPLOY & STUDY the SCIENTIFIC METHOD, which involves the application of a SET OF RULES for making EMPIRICAL or “real-world” observations.

The scientific method ensures a rigorous, objective and unambiguous investigation as a result of adhering to a set of rules (the SCIENTIFIC METHOD). The common sense approach does not adhere to any rules and is therefore particularly VULNERABLE to the effects of INCONSISTENCY, SUBJECTIVITY and AMBIGUITY.

So the scientific method provides psychologists with a means of ensuring OBJECTIVITY.

The SCIENTIFIC APPROACH to the collection of evidence is SYSTEMATIC, evaluating ALL of the available evidence, and seeking CONFIRMATION (not “proof”) of a theory.

The COMMON SENSE APPROACH often seeks out CONFIRMATORY EXAMPLES supportive of its position and IGNORES disconfirming evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

FRITZ HEIDER (1958)

A

A prominent SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGIST who studied how people go about trying to UNDERSTAND other people’s behaviours.

Formally introduced the idea that that people are like “AMATEUR SCIENTISTS”.

He observed that people are really sort of “NAÏVE SCIENTISTS” piecing together information until they arrive at a reasonable explanation or cause of the behaviours of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

A

In the interests of PRECISION & OBJECTIVITY, scientific language employs OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS:

A precise set of procedures or operations used to measure or manipulate a concept.

In each case, the use of an operational definition tells others precisely WHICH of the many possible ways anxiety COULD BE measured, it actually WAS measured and allows them to REPEAT the research in ALL of its essential DETAILS.

The using operational definitions to communicate the findings provides psychologists with PRECISION.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Scientific Investigations

A

THEORY –> HYPOTHESIS –> EMPIRICAL TEST

Scientific investigations investigate VARIABLES and the RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THEM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

THEORY

A

An explanatory account of a well-defined subject matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

HYPOTHESIS

A

A statement about an empirical consequence, that is deduced from the principles of a theory.

“IF THIS…THEN THAT” statements in which the researcher reasons that IF the theory states such-and-so about human behaviour (and it is correct), THEN we should see such-and-so behaviour taking place in the real (empirical) world.

Predictions such as these are converted into very PRECISE STATEMENTS OF EXPECTATION called HYPOTHESES.

Hypotheses are NOT research questions, they are STATEMENTS. The researcher is making a STATEMENT of what he/she should observe in the empirical (real) world IF the theory is correct.

20
Q

EMPIRICAL TEST

A

A research study in which real world observations are made that are directly relevant to the hypothesis under investigation.

A research study is undertaken which is designed to test the predictions generated from the theory.

If something is “EMPIRICAL” it can be observed and measured. You can think of EMPIRICAL as “REAL WORLD”.

If the evidence from such an EMPIRICAL TEST is CONSISTENT with the hypothesis, the researcher is said to have found SUPPORT for the theory that has generated the hypothesis. If the evidence is NOT CONSISTENT with the hypothesis, the theory is said to be UNSUPPORTED and must be MODIFIED to accommodate the empirical findings.

21
Q

The “PROOF vs. CONFIRMATION” Trap

A

Even if all of the hypotheses under investigation are supported through empirical tests, the theory is NOT necessarily PROVEN to be correct.

WHY NOT?

BECAUSE it still may be the case that some ALTERNATIVE THEORY exists which accounts for the empirical observations as well or better than the theory under investigation.

Researchers speak of “CONFIRMATION” rather than “proof”, as this term implies an understanding that alternative accounts of the evidence may exist.

22
Q

CONFIDENCE in a theory comes from:

A
  1. showing that its predictions (hypotheses) are confirmed.
  2. showing that alternative theories do a less adequate job of accounting for the evidence than the theory under investigation.
23
Q

3 important features you should note about variables:

A
  1. A variable is a GENERAL PROPERTY. It is a characteristic shared by a class or group of individuals or events. Therefore any PARTICULAR person or event is NOT a variable.
  2. A variable must be able to take on DIFFERENT VALUES (these values are called LEVELS). Therefore a variable cannot have one CONSTANT value.
  3. The way to establish that a variable has changed value is to MEASURE it. Therefore variables must be MEASURABLE.
24
Q

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES (IV)

A

The variable that is suspected of having an effect on the DV. In an EXPERIMENT, the researcher CONTROLS the IV by MANIPULATING the amount of IV each of the subjects receives.

25
Q

DEPENDENT VARIABLE (DV)

A

The variable that is suspected of being affected by the IV. In an EXPERIMENT, the researcher MEASURES the DV and thereby observes the magnitude of effect the IV has on the DV.

26
Q

CONFOUNDING VARIABLES (CONFOUNDS)

A

Those factors, which when allowed to act on the variables under investigation, cannot be ruled out as possible alternative explanations for the observed relationship(s) between the variables of interest.

CONFOUNDS are any EXTRANEOUS variables other than the ones under investigation in the experiment which interfere with the researcher’s ability to draw conclusions about the relationships between the IV and DV.

27
Q

Variables vs. Levels of a Variable

A

A variable is the characteristic itself (e.g., age, # of wrinkles, colour of hair) and can therefore take any number of values.

A level of the variable is a particular value that this characteristic has in fact, taken on.

28
Q

The three principal approaches to research

A
  1. DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH (e.g., naturalistic observation, case studies, surveys)
  2. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH (the scientific experiment with manipulation of the IV)
  3. RELATIONAL RESEARCH (the correlational study without manipulation of the IV)
29
Q

NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION

A

The study of naturally occurring behaviour by an “INVISIBLE OBSERVER.” That is, the behaviour being studied is entirely unaffected by the person doing the studying.

Examples:

  • Jane Goodall’s observations of primate behaviour in Africa (chimpanzees)
  • Some of Piaget’s work on children’s behaviour
  • Rosenhan studies on being sane in a psychiatric hospital

Naturalistic Observation…

  1. is the least rigorous type of research. The investigator does NOT attempt to control conditions, but rather OBSERVES naturally occurring behaviour.
  2. is HIGH on REALISM. It is designed to DESCRIBE rather than EXPLAIN.
  3. may be the ONLY WAY to gain access to the behaviours of interest when a manipulation may be UNETHICAL, IMPRACTICAL OR IMPOSSIBLE to carry out with certain psychological variables.
30
Q

2 ISSUES to be addressed when doing naturalistic observation:

A

Whether to PARTICIPATE with your subjects or NOT

  • PARTICIPANT observers MIX with the subjects of their study. They play an ACTIVE or “INSIDER” role.
  • NON-PARTICIPANT observers DO NOT MIX with the subjects of the study. They play an INACTIVE or “OUTSIDER” role.

Whether to CONCEAL yourself or NOT.

  • CONCEALED observers DO NOT DISCLOSE their role to their subjects. So subjects DO NOT KNOW that they are subjects in a research investigation at the time of data collection.
  • NON-CONCEALED observers DO DISCLOSE their role to their subjects. So subjects DO KNOW that they are subjects at the time of data collection.
31
Q

CONCEALMENT & PARTICIPATION

A

Conceal your identity as a researcher and participate in the behaviours you are observing. An AA member who is actually collecting data UNBEKNOWNST to the real members who are his/her subjects is CONCEALED and PARTICIPATING.

32
Q

CONCEALMENT & NON-PARTICIPATION

A

conceal your identity as a researcher and do not participate in the behaviours. A researcher who is observing the meeting from an ADJACENT room with a 2-WAY MIRROR is NOT PARTICIPATING and is CONCEALED.

33
Q

NON-CONCEALMENT & NON-PARTICIPATION

A

Simply identify yourself as a researcher and openly collect data without participating in the behaviours/events you are investigating.

34
Q

NON-CONCEALMENT & PARTICIPATION

A

This is much less likely since it would require that the researcher both participates in the behaviours/events under investigation AND is open about his/her status as a researcher.

35
Q

3 disadvantages of Participation & Concealment:

A
  1. REACTIVITY
    The possibility that those observed will behave DIFFERENTLY in the presence of the observer. Reactivity is greater for NON-PARTICIPANT OBSERVERS than for PARTICIPANT OBSERVERS and ONLY APPLIES in NON-CONCEALED circumstances
  2. OBSERVER BIAS
    A LOSS OF OBJECTIVITY on the part of the observer. Observer bias is greater for PARTICIPANT OBSERVERS than for NON-PARTICIPANT OBSERVERS and could apply in CONCEALED or NON-CONCEALED circumstances.
  3. ETHICAL CONCERNS
    Concealed observation = SPYING on people! RULE OF THUMB: If observed behaviour = PUBLIC (i.e., taking place in a public situation—e.g., a shopping mall), concealed observation is OK. If observed behaviour = PRIVATE (i.e., taking place in a private situation—e.g., someone’s home), concealed observation is NOT OK.
36
Q

INFORMED CONSENT

A

A procedure that takes place prior to participation in which subjects are made aware of the general purpose of the study, the risks associated with participation, and their right to terminate participation at any time during the study.

37
Q

DEBRIEFING

A

A procedure that takes place after participation in which the true purpose of the study and the need for deception are explained to the participants and any psychological or physical ramifications of participation are addressed.

38
Q

APA Ethical Guidelines for Psychological Research:

A

The AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (APA) requires that psychological research strive to comply with 5 PRINCIPLES. These PRINCIPLES are very SIMILAR to those of the CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (CPA) and there are 6 of these:

  1. protect welfare of participants
  2. avoid doing harm
  3. anticipated benefit of study must
    outweigh anticipated risk
  4. secure informed consent
  5. no coercion to secure informed
    consent
  6. ensure privacy & confidentiality
39
Q

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

A

Investigate causal relationships. The general form of a causal relationship is:

When differences on variable A are PRODUCED, then differences on variable B are OBSERVED.

40
Q

RELATIONAL APPROACH

A

Investigate predictive relationships. The general form of a predictive relationship is:

When differences on variable A are OBSERVED, then differences on variable B are OBSERVED.

41
Q

THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT

A

A method of determining the CAUSALITY of a relationship between two or more variables by manipulation of some of those variables under precisely specified conditions.

NOTE: If done appropriately, data gathered using this approach may be used to make CAUSAL CLAIMS about the relationship(s) between the variables of interest.

Factors such as MOTIVATION are called CONFOUNDS.

Experiments…

  1. are RIGOROUS in the sense of permitting the investigator a high degree of CONTROL over the variables being measured.
  2. have the ability to MANIPULATE the IV – which includes controlling confounding variables – gives the experiment the POWER to reveal CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS between variables.
  3. achieve experimental control at the COST of ARTIFICIALITY. That is, HIGH INTERNAL VALIDITY (experimental control) is sometimes gained at the cost of LOW EXTERNAL VALIDITY (“naturalness”).
  4. have higher internal validity than CORRELATIONAL STUDIES, for example, but CORRELATIONAL STUDIES have higher external validity than do EXPERIMENTS.
42
Q

THE CORRELATIONAL STUDY

A

a method of determining the existence and extent of a RELATIONSHIP between two or more variables by measurement or observation of the variables of interest.

NOTE: Data gathered using this technique may not be used to make causal claims about the relationship(s) between the variables of interest.

factors such as MOTIVATION are called THIRD FACTORS.

Correlational Studies…

  1. often allow us to investigate phenomena that would be ethically or practically impossible to investigate using an EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH.
  2. are somewhat LESS RIGOROUS than experiments in the sense that the researcher’s ability to control extraneous variables (third factors) is LIMITED. The main limitation is the ABSENCE of RANDOM ASSIGNMENT.
  3. reveal predictive (not causal) relationships between variables.
  4. rely on the MEASUREMENT (not manipulation) of ALL of the variables
43
Q

RANDOM ASSIGNMENT

A

A method of assigning subjects to conditions such that each subject has an equal chance of being assigned to each of the conditions.

44
Q

INTERNAL VALIDITY

A

The degree to which a research finding can be attributed to the effects of the IV on the DV and not to the effects of confound(s).

45
Q

EXTERNAL VALIDITY

A

The degree to which a research finding may be generalized beyond the circumstances of the study.