Executive Compensation Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the role of executive compensation as a corporate governance device

A

EC plays an important corporate governance device to align managers interests and shareholders.

It is used to attract the right talent, motivate them when in executive position and reward managers who maximise shareholder value. Hence, getting the compensation right is very important in maximising SV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the optimal contracting vs. managerial power debate

A

This debate highlights differing opinions on how executive pay should work to handle conflicts of interest in companies. (agency theory)

The optimal contracting perspective says manager pay should strongly connect to performance, aligning with share value to address conflicts.

In contrast, the managerial power perspective suggests a weak link between pay and performance, with managers possibly securing higher pay based on negotiation skills rather than actual success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the optimal contracting perspective?

A

The optimal contracting perspective is when companies create financial incentives to reduce moral hazard in a principal-agent relationship.

These contracts are designed to satisfy a manager’s participation constraint and incentive compatibility constraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is meant by managers participation constraint? in optimal contracting

A

Is the executive remuneration enough to attract talented individuals to a post?

Making sure it’s met is CRUCIAL in motivating the desired managerial behaviour required by the shareholders etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by incentive compatibility constraint? in optimal contracting

A

Using executive remuneration to motivate managers to make decisions and take actions that maximise shareholder value.

Hence aligning managers and shareholders interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three things that Executive compensation does when optimally contracted vs when managerial power is used to decide pay?

A

Optimally contracted:
1) Attract talented people
2) Motivate them when in the job
3) Reward them for max shareholder value

Managerial Power:
1) Exec compensation is in excess of that required to attract talented individuals to a post
2) EC is in excess of that required to motivate managers
3) EC is weakly related to firm value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the managerial power perspective?

A

When Senior executives use their power to influence how much they are paid and pay composition (structure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the term used when greater managerial power results in greater excess pay?

A

Rent extraction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

State some components of executive pay packages

A

Golden hello
Salary
Bonus
Executive Stock Option (ESO)
Restricted stock
Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
Golden parachute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What kind of incentive system does the board of directors want the Executive compensation to encourage?

A

They aim to create a BALANCED incentive system that considers both short-term and long-term performance within the EC package.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the impact on incentives for Golden Hello, Golden Parachute, Salary and Bonus

A

Golden hello: Financial motivation for taking the role.

Golden parachute: Offers financial security but may reduce risk perception.

Salary: Offers financial security, but not directly linked to performance.

Bonus: Direct motivation for achieving targets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the impact on incentives for ESO, Restricted Stock, LTIP

A

ESO: Motivates executives to improve company performance.

Restricted Stock: Encourages long-term commitment and performance.

LTIP: Ties compensation to long-term success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain what a Golden Hello, Golden Parachute, Salary and Bonus is

A

GH - one-time payment or bonus offered to executives when they join a new company. It’s designed to attract top talent to a new position.

GP - severance package provided to executives in the event of a change in control, such as a merger or acquisition, leading to their termination.

Salary - The fixed regular payment made to executives for their services.

Bonus - A variable payment given to executives based on meeting certain performance targets or achieving specific goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain what ESO, Restricted Stock, LTIP is

A

ESO - Grants executives the right to purchase company stock at a predetermined price, usually in the future.

RS - Executives receive company stock, but ownership is restricted for a certain period. It may have conditions such as performance goals or time-based vesting.

LTIP - A performance-based compensation plan extending over a longer period, often years. It can include various elements like stock options, restricted stock, or other incentives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the evidence say regarding the impact of EC on Acquisitions from Sanders (2001) and Bebchuck et al. (2014)?

  • in terms of ESO and pay package
  • in terms of GP
A

Sanders (2001) find that structure of pay package impacts on acquisition behaviour

1) Firms whose CEOs are COMPENSATED with ESOs are more likely to engage in acquisitions and divestments
2) Firms whose CEOs OWN shares are less likely to engage in acquisitions and divestments

Bebchuck et al. (2014):
- Experience negative impact on stock returns when they are adopted
- Associated with higher acquisition premiums
- Overall negative effect on shareholder wealth
- Consistent with managerial power perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the evidence say regarding impact of EC on Divestment from Haynes, Thompson and Wright (2007)?

  • What is divestment
  • How does it affect CEO’s
  • pay-size relationship?
A

Divestment is a way of reducing the scale and scope of a firm’s activities if it has grown beyond its optimal size or scope.

  • Haynes, Thompson and Wright (2007) find that CEOs are not directly rewarded for voluntarily downsizing their firms via divestment
  • They also find a strong pay-size relationship
  • Little incentive for CEOs to voluntarily downsize
17
Q

What does the evidence say concerning impact of ESO on performance from Main et al. (1996) and Hanlon et al. (2003)?

A

Studies show ESOs result in strong pay-performance relationship

  • Main et al., (1996) found a 10% ↑ in shareholder wealth => 7.2% ↑ in CEO total pay package
  • Hanlon et el. (2003) found that $1 of ESO grant is associated with the generation $3.71 of operating income over the 5 years after the ESO grant
18
Q

What does the evidence say regarding LTIP impact on performance from Buck et al 2003?

(Implication & Finding)

A

Total Compensation Increase:

  • Finding: As LTIPs increase, total compensation for managers rises.
  • Implication: Raises concerns about the proportionality of the increase to added shareholder value.

Pay-Performance Sensitivity Reduction:

  • Finding: LTIPs are associated with a reduction in pay-performance sensitivity.
  • Implication: Suggests a weakened link between executive pay and company performance.

Differential Impact on CEO Pay and Shareholder Wealth:

  • Finding: Inclusion of LTIPs weakens the correlation between CEO pay and shareholder wealth. £1000 inc in SW leads to £1.81 CEO pay without LTIP and falls to £1.55 with!
  • Implication: Indicates potential misalignment between executive incentives and shareholder interests, contributing to the agency problem.
19
Q

What does the evidence say regarding Bonus impact on performance from Fattorusso et al. (2007) ?

(Implication & Finding)

A

Bonus and Shareholder Return:

  • Finding: No correlation between executive bonuses and shareholder return.
  • Implication: Supports managerial power perspective, suggesting executives may secure bonuses without clear ties to company performance.

Transparency Measures and Bonus Payout Odds:

  • Finding: No link between transparency measures and the likelihood of bonus payouts.
  • Implication: Inconsistent with managerial power perspective, challenging the idea that executive power is the sole determinant in bonus allocations.
20
Q

What does evidence say regarding Salary impact on performance?

in terms of pay-performance and pay-firm size

A

Salary (+ bonus) measured:
- Weak pay-performance relationships often reported
- Strong pay-firm size relationship