Final Case Facts Flashcards

1
Q

Governors of Dalhousie College v Boutilier’s Estate

A
  • D promised Dal $5000 for undetermined improvements
  • Had financial hardships then died
  • Promise not completed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Eastwood v Kenyon

A
  • Guardian P takes out loan for Sara
  • S became of age and promised to pay (paid 1 years interest)
  • S married D who promised he would pay
  • D did not pay so P sued
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lampleigh v Brathwait

A
  • D kills someone, sends P for pardon from king
  • P rode cross country and got the pardon
  • After D promised to pay P 100p
  • D does not pay P sues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stilk v Myrick

A
  • Sea voyage
  • P was to be paid 5p per month
  • 2 seamen deserted
  • Crew + Captain entered agreement saying for the extra work the crew would split the deserters wages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Gilbert Steel v University Construction

A
  • P and D had contract to deliver steel
  • Price went up P approached D for new written contract and D said yes
  • Price went up again, D less willing, worked out oral deal to pay new price
  • D pays the amount in the 2nd agreement not the oral one (3rd)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Williams v Roffey Bros

A
  • D contractor, subcontracted to P
  • P had financial difficulties cause price for the work was too low
  • D concerned P might not finish on time
  • D offered to pay more so P would speed up
  • D did not pay the full amount owed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Greater Fredericton Airport Authority v Nav Canada

A
  • D was the sole provider of aviation equipment to P
  • P needed new runway
  • D said they needed a new tech system to do it and drafted a new agreement saying P would pay for it
  • P said they weren’t bound to pay but “under protest” signed saying they would pay for it
  • D installed equip. P didn’t pay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Foakes v Beer

A
  • F owes B money from a law suit
  • Agreed F would pay $500 immediately and $150 every 6 months
  • B says she’s entitled to interest because debt wasn’t paid off immediately
  • F said contact didn’t mention interest
  • B said no new agreement cause no consideration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Re Selectmove Ltd

A
  • S didn’t make tax/insurance payments from employees pay cheques
  • Made a deal with tax collector to accept the amount in arrears
  • Collector said he needed approval and he would get back to them if the deal wasn’t acceptable
  • Then Crown demanded payment in full
  • S made payments after but not in strict accordance with the deal
  • S sold to another company
  • Crown sought winding up petition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Foot v Rawlings

A
  • F owed R large sum from build up of promissory notes
  • R was old and realized the current agreement wouldn’t get him the money in time to enjoy it
  • R proposed new agreement that F would pay less in exchange for post dated cheques every 6 months
  • F followed
  • R cashed some cheques but then sued for remaining amount
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Central London Property v High Trees House

A
  • P leased flats to D for 99 years at 2500/year
  • P agreed to accept half priced rent because of trouble renting in wartime
  • Then after a while tried to claim full rent again along with arrears for the half rent years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Combe v Combe

A
  • P claimed D (ex husband) agreed to pay $100 per year
  • P didn’t seek support besides this
  • D acknowledges this but has never paid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

D & C Builders v Rees

A
  • D hires P to do work
  • D had some money still owed and was not paying
  • No dispute about the work
  • D claims bad work and says they will only pay a lesser sum, it’s that or nothing
  • P reluctantly accepts, settlement
  • P still tries to collect full amount, D says they are estopped due to settlement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Waltons Stores v Maher

A
  • W wanted to lease land owned by M
  • W wanted building demolished and built to their specifications
  • Due date which M told W they could not meet unless they began demo immediately
  • Lease was never signed
  • W silent on amendments they had not agreed to
  • Building was demoed and new building started (W could see this)
  • Weeks later W returned unsigned lease and said they didn’t want to proceed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

John Burrows Ltd v Subsurface Surveys Ltd

A
  • S purchased B’s business
  • Part of purchase price was secured by promissory note
  • Note provided for monthly payments and had acceleration clause saying B could collect in full if there was default of over 10 days on payments
  • Every payment was late but accepted without protest or invoking clause
  • Disagreement between parties
  • B sued for whole amount when S paid late on next payment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

International Knitwear Architects v Carob Investments

A
  • P was leasing from D for a 5 yr term
  • P experienced financial difficulties
  • D agreed to reduce rent
  • Dec ‘91 no payment was made
  • D then tried to collect arrears of original rent throughout the term of the lease, interest, and payment in full from Jan ‘92
  • P sued for illegal distress, D countersued for rent and other moneys owing under lease for the whole term
17
Q

W.J. Alan & Co v El Nasr Export

A
  • W (Kenyan coffee producers) agree to sell coffee to an Egyptian trading company under 2 separate contracts (half the amount in each) in Kenyan currency
  • At the time not much difference between Kenyan currency and sterling
  • First contract and second partially fulfilled accepting sterling
  • Sterling was to devalue, Kenyan wasn’t
  • The invoice for the rest of the delivery was in sterling
  • W gave an invoice for the extra amount to account for the difference in value
  • D says no more is owed
18
Q

The Post Chaser

A
  • P agreed to sell palm oil to D who contracted to then sell it to sub-buyers (C)
  • Terms of contract required “declaration of ship to be made to D, as soon as possible after ships sailing”
  • P didn’t give declaration until more than a month after ship sailed, C didn’t protest, other sub-buyers did
  • Deal fell through
  • P forced to sell oil elsewhere at a loss, they claimed damages
19
Q

Royal Bank v Kiska

A
  • Bank brought action on guarantee signed by D

- At the time of signature no seal was attached to guarantee but the word “seal” was printed beside the place to sign

20
Q

Deglman v Guaranty Trust

A
  • Nephew lived with Aunt
  • Aunt told nephew that if he was good to her and helped her with services/errands she would leave him her house
  • Nephew complied for many years, then moved
  • In the will, house doesn’t go to him
21
Q

Lensen v Lensen

A

No facts for this case

22
Q

Provender v Wood

A
  • W agreed w/ P’s dad to pay 20 euros to P after P and his daughter got married
  • W didn’t pay
23
Q

Tweddle v Atkinson

A
  • Fathers orally agreed that D would give P a dowry for the marriage of D’s daughter
  • After the marriage they made it a written agreement, including term saying the son in law could sue for the promised money
  • D did not pay
24
Q

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridges

A
  • Dun (manufacturer) selling to Dew (wholesaler)
  • Dun and Dew have a contract which specified a price maintenance agreement (Dew promises to make buyers agree to it too)
  • S (retailer) enters a similar agreement with Dew for the product pricing
  • Customer agrees to purchase from S and they charge him less than listed price
  • Items sold for less then originally intended
25
Q

London Drugs v Keuhne & Nagel International

A
  • P delivered transformer to company D worked for for storage
  • Stored under contract that included limitation of liability clause (warehousemen owed reasonable care and diligence, liability limited to $40)
  • In return for cheap storage
  • D responsible for moving it when it fell and was damaged (expensive damage)
  • P trying to sue employees of the company