Final Exam Flashcards

1
Q

Hawkins v. McGee

A

Expectation Damages: purpose is to put the plaintiff in as good a position as he would have been in had the defendant kept his contract
Rule helps to avoid litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Problem of the Day
Hawkins v. McGee
Oil

A

1,000 barrels of oil @ $50
$44 buyer refuses to go through with the transaction
- 50-44 6 x 1,000=$6,000
He should go through with the sale and take the loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hamer v. Sidway

A

Promises to Make a Gift

Rule: In general a waiver of any legal right at the request of another is sufficient consideration for a promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consideration

A

-Something of legal value in —Exchange for a promise

necessary for existence of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consideration consists of two elements

A
  • something of legal value must be given

- must be a bargained for exchange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

test for Legal Value

A

Promisee suffers a legal detriment

Promisor receives a legal benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

test for bargained for exchange

A

Process of bargaining or inducement that leads to an enforceable contract
- naturally present in most commercial transactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Illegal Act

A

Promise to refrain from doing an illegal act is not enforceable
Reason: a promise to refrain from doing an illegal act does not constitute a legal detriment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kirksey

A

Dear Atillico and Brother in Law moved family on a promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Batsakis

A

Rule: courts do not inquire into the adequacy or sufficiency of consideration, drachmae

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to the legal experts in contract law, if I say to you if you go over to the bookstore there you may purchase a sweatshirt on my credit

A

It is often difficult to determine whether words of condition in a promise indicate a request for consideration, mere condition in a gratuitous promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gratuitous Promises

A

Contract law has a problem with promises that are freely given and not induced by a promise of some benefit
-unenforceable due to lack of consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Promises to Make a Gift

A

Promises made of sense of moral obligation lack consideration
completed gift promise is not revocable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Free Market Principle in Am Contract Law

A

Parties to contract free to place whatever value they desire on a particular bargain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Adequacy of Consideration

A

Non-equivalence of consideration may be the evidence of fraud, duress, undue influence or mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Co.

A

Rule: A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee and which does induce such action or forbearance is binding if injustice can be avoided only be enforcement of the promise

17
Q

Past Consideration

A

prior act or performance that does not support a new contract

18
Q

Promissory estoppel

A

An equitable doctrine that prevents the withdrawal of a promise by a promisor if it will adversely affect a promisee who has adjusted his or her position in justifiable reliance on the promise

19
Q

Think Red Owl promissory estoppel, Feinberg

A

promise in which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on part of the promisee

20
Q

Elements of promissory estoppel

A

promisee reasonably relies on the promise by promisor
promisor is aware promissee relied on promise
promissee suffers detriment or forbearance due to reliance
Injustice occurs as a result

21
Q

Wood v. Lucy Duff Gordon

A

Issue: Was wood’s promise illusory and therefore not supported by consideration

22
Q

Lucy v. Zehmer

A

When a person’s words and actions, judged under a reasonable standard, demonstrate an intent to agree to a contract, his/her unexpressed subjective state of mind is irrelevant.