General Questions Flashcards

1
Q

Link these question types with the relevant study types
1 - aetiology
2 - how to diagnose
3 - effectiveness
4 - patient experience
5 - demographic/incidence

A - qualitative studies
B - RCTs
C - case control/cohort
D - descriptive studies
E - diagnostic test accuracy studies

A

1 - C
2 - E
3 - B
4 - A
5 - D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 A’s? (And what do they mean?)

A

A - assess (PICOS)
A - access (NICE, evidence summaries, SRs, primary studies, expert opinion)
A - appraise (CASP)
A - apply/act (skills, cost, accessibility, plausibility)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When might the best evidence still not provide certainty about management to a patient?

A
  1. Many studies are based on population data; what my be applicable to the population may not be for an individual pt
  2. Multiple options available (patient’s wants & needs come first wrt potential side effects)
  3. ‘Best evidence’ may still not be applicable to pt (excluded groups)
  4. May still not be enough evidence to use certain treatments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the GRADE tool?

A

? DM lecture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Generalisability/external validity

A

PICO relevant to your local context?

P - patients similar in demographic/characteristics/stage of disease
I - feasibility/cost of intervention, alternatives available & effect clinically significant?
C - is the comparator the baseline treatment in my healthcare setting?
O - were all important outcomes considered?
(Benefits, harms, PROs & PROMs)

  • implications for practice (would you recommend + justify why)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When asked to explore a study further, what questions could you ask?

A

DTA - cost of test, patient experience of using test, HCP experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explaining a box and whisker plot

A

Box = summary/point estimate for that single study - may be mean difference
Whisker = CI (precision)

Explaining where it lies in a forest plot:
- size of effect (point estimate, where lies on x-axis)
- direction of effect (position relative to line of no effect, positive/negative & significance of this)
- weight of study (size of box, given as percentage in next column)
- precision (95% CI, describe what effect the intervention could confer)
- significance of effect (whether the CI overlaps with line of no effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Meta-analysis/forest plot - explain the diamond at the bottom of each sub-plot

A

Vertical axis - point pooled estimate of studies above
Horizontal axis - CI pooled estimate

(Comment on size, direction, precision & significance of pooled estimate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is I2?

A

A quantitative measure of heterogeneity.

Heterogeneity - a measure of variation in effect sizes across included studies in a meta-analysis that is not accountable to chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What factors may increase heterogeneity between studies?

A

Clinical:
Population
- types/stage of disease, severity, spread
- stage of treatment/previous intervention
- age of participants (also ethnicity, race, sex etc)
- type of treatment & where available
- motivation of people taking part (could also be affected by demographic)
Intervention
- type of intervention (ie. - definitions for ‘moderate exercise’)
- dose (duration, intensity, who delivers/self-administered?)
- support available & degree of follow up
- ease of access/some degree of healthy reproducer/ptpt effect?
Outcome
- variation in outcome measure/tools used - detection bias

Methodological:
Study design
- variation in quality of studies
- variation in study protocol (ie - levels of confounding, bias and recruitment strategies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the null hypothesis (H0)

A

No statistically significant difference between the two groups/arms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is evidence based practice?

A

The combination of:
- the best available evidence
- the doctor’s own clinical expertise
- patient’s ICE & preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When conducting a literature search, what must you check for at each step?

A
  • quality
  • relevance
  • currency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are evidence summaries?

A

Summarises existing evidence using SRs & identifies gaps in the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do clinical guidelines differ from evidence summaries?

A
  • conduct de novo SRs
  • comprehensive review of 1ry & 2ry sources & economic analysis
  • addresses entire disease pathway, searches driven by need for info not restricted by quality of evidence
  • use GRADE to evaluate confidence in evidence
  • engage stakeholders
  • develop recommendations for clinical practice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the GRADE tool do?

A

Summarises strength of evidence at level of clinical question/outcome of interest, provides a systematic approach for developing recommendations

17
Q

What are the 5 domains of the GRADE tool?

A

Risk of Bias (evidence hierarchy & critical appraisal)
Imprecision (width CI, worst possible est effect?)
Inconsistency (CI overlap, heterogeneity)
Indirectness (applicability to pop/setting (PICO)
Publication bias (‘missing studies’, pot effect on est effect)
- English language, effect size

18
Q

What factors are considered when making strong recommendations?

A
  • strength/certainty of evidence (GRADE)
  • size of effect (relative to adverse eff)
  • cost/resource
  • pt preference
19
Q

What are the 6 domains from the AGREE II tool?

A
  1. Scope & purpose
  2. Stakeholder involvement (guideline development group, all relevant professional groups, views & preferences target pop)
  3. Rigour of development (clear descriptions, systematic methods, strengths & limitations)
  4. Clarity of presentation (specific, different options)
  5. Applicability ( facilitators & barriers, resource implications, advice, monitoring/auditing criteria)
  6. Editorial independence (conflicting interests)
20
Q

What is the difference between internal & external validity?

A

Internal validity - degree to which effect observed is attributable to evidence & not other internal factors (bias & confounding)

External validity - affected by internal validity, ability to generalise to local population

21
Q

In an open study, how do you measure risk?

A

Person years

Measure of length of time individual has been in study (when ptpts in study for different times)

22
Q

What is the difference between study population & study sample?

A

Pop - all from target pop who would be eligible for study
Sample - those who actually participate