Human Health Risk Assessment and Environmental Public Health Tracking Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of risk

A
  • The chance of harmful effects to human health resulting from exposure to an environmental Stressor
  • Any physical, chemical, or biological entity that can induce an adverse response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of risk assessment

A

The process to estimate the nature and probability of adverse health effects to people who may be exposed to hazardous substances in contaminated environmental media Soil, groundwater, air, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Aspects of human health risk assessments conducted by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry or by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

A

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsmRmza58qLBfgz6TQwp85vV4QdgA25KEvVa4xRBSJ4/edit?usp=sharing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Major pre-step and steps (and definitions) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Human Health Risk Assessment process

A
  1. Hazard Identification
    -What health problems are caused by the
    pollutant?
  2. Dose-Response Assessment
    -What are the health problems at different
    exposures?
  3. Exposure Assessment
    -How much of the pollutant are people exposed
    to during a specific time period? How many
    people are exposed
  4. Risk Characterization
    -What is the extra risk of health problems in the
    exposed population?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of toxicokinetics

A

Absorption - lungs
Distribution - blood
Metabolism - liver
Excretion - urine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition of toxicodynamics

A

Cellular, organ, and organismal responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Non-linear dose-response assessment

A

Used when ‘mode of action’ data suggests a threshold for toxicity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

NOAEL: no observed adverse effect level

A

Denotes the level of exposure of an organism, found by experiment or observation, at which there is no biologically or statistically significant increase in the frequency or severity of any adverse effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

LOAEL: lowest observed adverse effect level

A

The lowest concentration or amount of a substance found by experiment or observation that causes an adverse alteration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Definition and examples of uncertainty factors

A

Full or partial order-of-magnitude values that help quantify our understanding of the uncertainty in a dose-response relationship
• Differences between animals and humans
• Variability within human populations
• Use of a LOAEL
• Use of a short-term study
• Database inadequacy (e.g., missing data on
certain effects)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reference dose and formula

A

An estimate of a daily exposure in humans, including sensitive populations, that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse effects during a lifetime.
𝑅𝑓𝐷 = 𝑒𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 / |-| (𝑈𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠)
-Where – eDose is the effect dose –
Uncertainties
-Type of dose (NOAEL, LOAEL)
-Differences between animals and humans •
-Variability within human populations •
-Exposure duration (acute, subchronic, and
chronic exposure)
-Database inadequacy (e.g., missing data on
certain health effects)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Linear dose-response assessment

A

-Used when the ‘mode of action’ data indicates no
toxicity threshold exists
-Often found when assessing carcinogenicity
-Theoretically, there is no level of exposure that
does not pose a small but real possibility of
generating a carcinogenic response
UFs are not used; a cancer slope factor is derived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exposure assessment estimation methods

A

Estimating the magnitude, frequency, and duration of human exposure to a substance in the environment

  • Intake of water and selected liquids
  • Non-dietary ingestion factors
  • Ingestion of soil and dust
  • Inhalation rates
  • Dermal exposure factors
  • Ingestion of foods
  • Activity factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition of risk characterization

A
Goal: summarize and integrate information from the prior steps to develop an overall conclusion about risk (answer the “So what does it mean?” question)
  -Conveys the assessor’s professional judgement 
   regarding
  -Presence or absence of risks
  -Methodology
  -Assumptions
  -Uncertainties
  -Recommendations for action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (and potential uses of EPHTN data)

A

http: //epht.health.utah.gov/
https: //ephtracking.cdc.gov/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly