II - Bivariate Correlational Research Flashcards

1
Q

Strength of r

A

+/- .10 = small or weak
+/- .30 = Medium, or moderate
+/- .50 = Large, or strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Point-biserial correlation

A

A statistical test used
for evaluating the association between one
categorical variable and one quantitative
variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phi coefficient:

A

categorical variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Considerations for investigating statistical validity

A

Need to consider:
 The effect size
 The statistical significance of the relationship
 A ny sub tli bgroups or outliers
 Whether a zero relationship might actually be
curvilinear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statistically Significant

A

A conclusion that a
result is extreme enough that it is unlikely to have happened by chance if the null hypothesis is true.
.Statistical significance calculations help
researchers evaluate the p y robability that the result
came from a population in which the association is
really zero.
 How often would we get an r of 0.24 just by chance,
even if there is no association in the population?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

P Value

A

The p p value helps evaluate the p y robability that
the sample’s association came from a
population in which the association is zero.
 If the probability is less than 5% (p < .05) the result
is very unlikely to have come from a “zeroassociation” population = statistically significant.
 If the probability is higher than 5% (p ≥ .05), we
cannot rule out the possibility that the result came
from a population in which the association is zero
= nonsignificant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Spurious

A

An association that is attributable
only to systematic mean differences on
subgroups within the sample.
 When you consider the subgroups separately, there
is no association (or the opposite association
appears)
two events or variables have no direct causal connection, yet it may be wrongly inferred that they do, due to either coincidence or the presence of a certain third, unseen factor (referred to as a “confounding factor” or “lurking variable”).
Suppose there is found to be a correlation between A and B. Aside from coincidence, there are three possible relationships:
A causes B,
B causes A,
OR
C causes both A and B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outlier

A

One or a few cases that stand out as
either much higher or much lower than most of
the other scores in a sample.
 In a bivariate correlation, outliers are mainly
problematic when they involve extreme scores on
both of the variables.
 Outliers matter the most when a sample is small.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The statistically valid way to analyze a

curvilinear relationship is to use:

A

a quadratic
model: test the correlation between one
variable and the square of the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Causation: Directionality problem

A

A situation in which it is
unclear which variable in an association came
first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causation: Third-variable problem

A

A situation in which
plausible alternative explanations exist for the
association between two variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moderator

A

A third variable that, depending on
its level, changes the relationship between two
other variables.
Ex 1: Marital status moderates the relationship
between maternal employment and child
achievement
Ex 2: Weekend/weekday status does not moderate the relationship between small talk and well
being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moderators vs Subgroups

A

When we are asking , about moderators, our
goal is to ask whether the association
between the two variables is different within
the levels of some third variable (the
moderator).
When we are asking about subgroups, our
goal is to make sure that the overall
associ tiaon b t th t i bl i th between the two variables is the
same within the two subgroups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly