Individual Decision Making Flashcards

1
Q

Risk v. uncertainty

A
Risk = defined outcomes and probabilities of each occurring
Uncertainty = defined outcomes but don't know probabilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The economic approach to human behaviour (?;?)

A
Becker 1976
Assumes:
- maximising behaviour (of wealth/utility)
- preferences are stable (over time/between people)
Doesn't distinguish between:
- major / minor decisions
- strong / little emotion
- income, education and background
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Expected value

A

the average value of an act, weighted by probability
EV = £
The same for all people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The St Petersburg Paradox

A

EV analysis implies risk neutral decision-maker

BUT most people are risk averse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Expected Utility Theory (?;?)

A

Bernoulli 1738
Poor and rich see risk and gain differently
= value must be based on utility not price
–> utility can change with circumstances
We have diminishing marginal utility = increase in wealth results in increase in utility inversely proportionate to quantity of goods already possessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Axioms of rationality (?)

A

von Neumann-Morgenstern
Completeness = either prefer A or B or are indifferent
Transitivity = if A is better than B and B is better than C then A is better than C
Continuity = if A>B>C then some combo of A and C should make them indifferent between that and B
Independence = A>B regardless of any given C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Allais Paradox (?;?) (?;?)

A

against independence axiom
List and Haigh 2005 - both students and traders are in line with it
Oliver 2003 - tested it with health outcomes rather than money - again independence was violated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ellsberg Paradox (?)

A

1961
we are ambiguity averse = prefer the gamble when we know what the probability is
Violates independence axiom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Risk aversion (?;?)

A

Rabin and Thaler 2001
Using EU to explain risk aversion over moderate stakes implies absurdly large risk aversion over large stakes
V. reality - most prefer large stakes
Implies people depart from risk neutrality only when facing prospects that might have a major effect on lifetime wealth = false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Loss aversion (?;?)

A

Tversky and Kahneman 1991
People perceive losses worse than gains
Potential explanation for the Allais paradox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Alternative model to EU theory (?;?)

A

Quiggin 1982
Anticipated Utility theory
-weaker form of independence axiom
-permits nonlinear weighting or probabilities
-attitude determined by attitudes to possible outcome and attitudes to the probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly