Intentional Torts Flashcards
Prima facie case of intentional tort
- Act by defendant – volitional movement
- Intent – specific or general
- Causation – defendant’s conduct is substantial factor in bringing about injury
What is specific intent?
Goal in acting is to bring about specific consequences
Definition: general intent
Actor knows with substantial certainty that consequences will result (baseball player throwing bat)
How is transferred intent triggered?
Defendant intends to commit tort against one person but
- Commits a DIFFERENT tort against same person, or
- Commits the SAME tort against a DIFFERENT person, or 3. Commits DIFFERENT tort against DIFFERENT person
How does transferred intent work?
The intent to commit a certain tort against one person is
- Transferred to the tort actually committed, or
- Transferred to the the person actually injured for purposes of establishing prima facie case
Transferred intent applies to which torts?
Intended AND Resulting tort are:
- Assault
- Battery
- False imprisonment
- Trespass to land
- Trespass to chattels
Is incapacity a defense to intent?
No! Children, drunk, mentally incompetent… watch out for SYMPATHETIC plaintiffs!
Def: causation
Result must be legally caused by defendant’s act or set in motion by him
Causation if defendant’s conduct was SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR in bringing about the injury
Elements of battery
- Harmful or offensive contact – reasonable person standard; NOT implied everyday contact (bumping on a bus); offensive = “unpermitted”
- to plaintiff’s person – includes anything connected to plaintiff (purse, cane)
- Intent
- Causation
**Actual damages are not required – can get nominal and punitive
Elements of assault
Act by defendant creating
- Reasonable apprehension – NOT fear or intimidation (68 pound weakling); apparent ability is enough
- of immediate harmful or offensive contact to plaintiff’s person (fearful of immediate battery)
- Intent
- Causation
**Actual damages not required – can get nominal and punitive
Assault – effect of words?
Words alone are not sufficient. Words must be coupled with conduct. BUT – words can negate apprehension (defendant raises fist but says he won’t hit you)
Elements of false imprisonment
Act or inaction on part of defendant that
- Confines or restrains plaintiff – time of confinement is irrelevant; plaintiff needs to KNOW or confinement or be harmed by it
- to a bounded area – freedom of movement limited in all directions; no REASONABLE means of escape known to plaintiff
- Intent
- Causation
**Actual damages not required – can get nominal and punitive
False imprisonment – What are sufficient acts of restraint?
- Physical barriers
- Physical force
- Threats of force
- Failure to release
- Invalid use of legal authority
False imprisonment – What acts are NOT sufficient to confine or restrain?
- Moral pressure
- Future threats
Elements of IIED
Act by defendant
- Amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct – transcends all bound of decency
- Intent or recklessness
- Causation
- Damages – severe emotional distress (only intentional tort to person requiring damages)
IIED – Situations where otherwise normal conduct become outrageous?
- Continuous in nature
- Directed at children, old people, pregnant women, known supersensitive people
- Committed by common carriers or innkeepers – person must be passenger or guest
IIED – how can a third party bystander recover?
Defendant intentionally harms someone and plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress. Plaintiff can recover if:
- Bystander was present when injury occurred
- Bystander is close relative of injured person
- Defendant knew these things
Elements of trespass to land
- Physical invasion of plaintiff’s real property – person or object; usable airspace and subsurface. Rocks and flooding yes, intangible no.
- Intent – only need intent to enter onto the land (put one foot in front of the other)
- Causation
**No actual injury to the land needed
Elements of trespass to chattels
Act by defendant that
- Interferes with plaintiff’s right of possession in a chattel – INTERMEDDLING (direct damage) or DISPOSSESSION (depriving plaintiff of lawful right of possession)
- Intent
- Causation
- Damages – to chattel or possessory right
Elements of conversion
Act by defendant that
- Interferes with plaintiff’s right of possession in chattel
- Interference is so serious that defendant should pay full value of chattel
- Intent
- Causation
Examples of conversion?
- Theft
- Wrongful transfer
- Wrongful detention
- Substantially changing, severely damaging, or misusing chattel
Remedies for conversion?
- Plaintiff can recover FMV damages
- Replevin (possession)
Defenses to intentional torts?
- Consent
- Self-defense
- Defense of others
- Defense of property
- Necessity
- Discipline
Who lacks capacity to consent?
- Children
- Mentally impaired
- Coerced/forced
- Gives consent based on fraud/mistake
False imprisonment – When is inaction enough?
There is an understanding that the defendant would act for the plaintiff’s benefit – ex. guy takes lady to shore on ship but won’t provide boat to get