Lecture 16 Flashcards

1
Q

What is value orientation?

A
  • value relevance
  • despite the value laden, the results of research should not be objective
  • Values drive our research, it contributes to objective knowledge
  • it brodens horrizon of knowledge instead of limiting it
  • our knowledge is limited so we need more perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the ideal type?

A
  • a construct by sociologist that is used that blends/integrates an individualizing/generalizing method
  • They are constructs that don’t reflect reality, knowledge
  • concepts are constructs/generative
  • Ideal type is a tool/construct that sociologists generate that account for discovering general and specific aspects
  • development methodology is abstract and specific features
  • we never encounter them in reality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are general approaches

A
  • General approaches (nomothetic) aim to discover/identify general laws/universals, basic mechanics of a phenomenon
  • Natural Vs cultural sciences can use general approaches
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are individualizing approaches ?

A
  • (ideographic) logical, look at what’s unique, distinct, looking for singularity, specific features
  • natural Vs cultural sciences can use individualizing approaches
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What type is capitalism

A
  • type of economic function/practice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what type is Protestantism?

A
  • type of religion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why did Weber criticize compte and Durkheim?

A
  • because our concepts a views do not reflect reality as they are constructs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How to think of abstractions?

A
  • as blue prints
  • difference between ideal worlds of ideas and the indefinite dimension of the real
    • ex: clown: to identify a person, need a person to be clumsy, type/feature, but not every clown will have these features of my typology
  • typology (abstractions) even if there are empirical manifestations of it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When classifying ideal types..

A
  • it’s not the quantity, but rather the quality
  • ideal types are not true of false, they are helpful or unhelpful
    Weber doesn’t consider the politics of concepts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Whats the concept of Objective possibility?

A
  • By Edward Myer’s of adequate and accidental causation
  • Try and create a space of analysis (influence significance) and not about establishing direct causation
  • He develops probalistic instead
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does Weber approach to concept of objective possibility

A
  • Try to deconstruct it
  • causal relationship of this type, a historian needs to construct a possible plan of events and remove what they deem significant from the equation (how likely/probably this event would happen)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the 2 possibilites of the battle example?

A
  1. Greek victory
    - - independence, flourishing of culture, democracy, reason and science
  2. Persian victory
    - - Persian King would have emphasized on theocratic religious culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Continuation on the battle example

A
  • Does not mean that this victory is a single cause, there are complex
  • establishing an event of significance (outlook on the world)
  • can only speculate on point 2
  • not a fail-safe approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s adequate causation/influence

A
  • In terms of cause, it’s significant and influential
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What’s accidental causation/influence

A
  • May have triggered historical events, but it’s likely that something else triggered it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is history rational?

A
  • History itself is not rational, we produce the meanings after the fact
17
Q

What is interpretative sociology?

A
  • sociologists interpret the meaning of social actions (in particular socio historical contexts)
  • aim to explain society, sociologists must get what drives what social action, produces social meanings
  • the more values of a group is troublesome/foreign the more difficult it would be to engage in an interpretive sociology
18
Q

What is natural science

A
  • observe empirical reality and generate concepts to explain their observation
  • understanding comes after the explanation
19
Q

What is cultural science ?

A
  • understanding preceedes explanation
  • deal with subjectivity, intention, conscious awareness
  • Rationl interpretation (direct understanding of a goal of an action) using logic, mathematical, intellectual understanding
    • ex: watch someone chapping wood, we understand that their goal is to cut wood`
20
Q

What is rational interpretation?

A
  • (direct understanding of a goal of an action) using logic, mathematical, intellectual understanding
    • ex: watch someone chapping wood, we understand that their goal is to cut wood`
21
Q

What is empathetic interpretation?

A
  • (indirect, explanatory understanding that implicates the goal, motive)
  • based on feelings
  • more artistic
  • felt understanding achieved through reliving with our imagination
22
Q

The three levels of empathetic interpretation

A
  1. The individual level
    - - Ex: John washed dishes
    - - goal: wash dishes
    - - motivation: please roomate
  2. Group
    - - intentions of an average agent
    - - Ex: North americans go to banks to do financial transactions
    - - motive: secure comfortable future
  3. Ideal typical level
    - - sociologists have the greater degree of abstractions
    - - Ex: in capitalist economy
    - - motivation: generate capital (ideal typically is to generate more capital)
23
Q

What are social actions?

A
  • What motivates people
  • involves an interaction with more and others
  • can be related to the past (ex: seeking revenge)
  • can be related to the present (EX: you hurt me now)
  • oriented towards future (EX: develop precaution when starting business)
  • communicative aspect of actions
  • no sharp dividing lines/unclear boundaries of these actions
24
Q

What are actions?

A
  • something we do because it is subjectively meaningful to us as an agent in the world
  • external actions
  • Ex: typing something unless i am texting, it is considered a social action
  • internal actions (Ex:meditation)
  • some actions are naturally reactive (EX: raning leads to people opening their umbrellas
25
Q

What are traditional actions?

A
  • expressions of settled actions, habits, routines, (mostly irrational, moe automatic ) rites, habitual ways of doing things
26
Q

What are affective/emotional actions?

A
  • expressions of emotional impulses (if it becomes more conconscious/deliberate it falls into the other category)
  • actions driven by emotions, passions, motivation/urge to satisfy/release
  • less effort and deliberate
  • not reactive, it’s conscious
27
Q

What are value rational actions?

A
  • motivated by principles, convictions
  • what matters is the conviction and not the conseuqence
  • attempts to realize an utimatevalue or principle
  • there’s osmething irrational about it, because there are things that defeat the purpose, paradoxical if the consequences defeat the goal
28
Q

What are end-rational actions?

A
  • instrumental rationality: considers the best means realistically to reach an end
  • accounts for it’s irrationality
  • anticipates the irrationality of the world : per relations and antagonistic)
  • actions that are more realistic
  • intention is driven by reflexivity