Lecture 16 Flashcards
1
Q
What is value orientation?
A
- value relevance
- despite the value laden, the results of research should not be objective
- Values drive our research, it contributes to objective knowledge
- it brodens horrizon of knowledge instead of limiting it
- our knowledge is limited so we need more perspective
2
Q
what is the ideal type?
A
- a construct by sociologist that is used that blends/integrates an individualizing/generalizing method
- They are constructs that don’t reflect reality, knowledge
- concepts are constructs/generative
- Ideal type is a tool/construct that sociologists generate that account for discovering general and specific aspects
- development methodology is abstract and specific features
- we never encounter them in reality
3
Q
What are general approaches
A
- General approaches (nomothetic) aim to discover/identify general laws/universals, basic mechanics of a phenomenon
- Natural Vs cultural sciences can use general approaches
4
Q
What are individualizing approaches ?
A
- (ideographic) logical, look at what’s unique, distinct, looking for singularity, specific features
- natural Vs cultural sciences can use individualizing approaches
5
Q
What type is capitalism
A
- type of economic function/practice
6
Q
what type is Protestantism?
A
- type of religion
7
Q
Why did Weber criticize compte and Durkheim?
A
- because our concepts a views do not reflect reality as they are constructs
8
Q
How to think of abstractions?
A
- as blue prints
- difference between ideal worlds of ideas and the indefinite dimension of the real
- ex: clown: to identify a person, need a person to be clumsy, type/feature, but not every clown will have these features of my typology
- typology (abstractions) even if there are empirical manifestations of it
9
Q
When classifying ideal types..
A
- it’s not the quantity, but rather the quality
- ideal types are not true of false, they are helpful or unhelpful
Weber doesn’t consider the politics of concepts
10
Q
Whats the concept of Objective possibility?
A
- By Edward Myer’s of adequate and accidental causation
- Try and create a space of analysis (influence significance) and not about establishing direct causation
- He develops probalistic instead
11
Q
How does Weber approach to concept of objective possibility
A
- Try to deconstruct it
- causal relationship of this type, a historian needs to construct a possible plan of events and remove what they deem significant from the equation (how likely/probably this event would happen)
12
Q
what are the 2 possibilites of the battle example?
A
- Greek victory
- - independence, flourishing of culture, democracy, reason and science - Persian victory
- - Persian King would have emphasized on theocratic religious culture
13
Q
Continuation on the battle example
A
- Does not mean that this victory is a single cause, there are complex
- establishing an event of significance (outlook on the world)
- can only speculate on point 2
- not a fail-safe approach
14
Q
What’s adequate causation/influence
A
- In terms of cause, it’s significant and influential
15
Q
What’s accidental causation/influence
A
- May have triggered historical events, but it’s likely that something else triggered it