Liability in Negligence for Psychiatric Injury. Flashcards
What are the four things that must be proven for liability for psychiatric injury sustained for primary and secondary victims?
1) C must suffer PI as the result of a sudden/horrifying event.
2) D must owe C a duty of care (is C a primary or secondary victim?
3) The duty must be breached.
4) The negligence must cause the PI.
Describe the first thing that must be proven:
1) C must suffer PI as the result of a sudden/horrifying event.
- It must be a diagnosed psychiatric injury (Behrens v Bertam).
- Grief, sorrow, fear and panic do not amount to PI (Hinz v Berry).
- If there is no sudden, horrifying event there can be no claim (Sion v Hampstead Health Authority).
- If there is a shorter period of decline in the condition the claim could be allowed (North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters).
Describe the second thing that must be proven:
2) D must owe C a duty of care.
- Is C a primary or secondary victim?
Primary victim: Those involved in the accident and suffered either physical injuries, mental injuries or both.
Secondary Victim: Not involved in the incident but suffered mental injury as a result of what they saw or heard at the scene of the accident or its immediate aftermath.
Describe the secondary victims tests:
Secondary Victims must pass the Alcock criteria and a threshold test.
- Alcock criteria:
C must have close ties of love and affection with V
The relationship must be ‘close’ (blood, relationship, close friend).
Whether it is ‘close’ would depend on the facts of whether such a relationship actually existed
Witnessed the event/aftermath with their own unaided sense
Suffered mental injuries at the scene of the accident or in its immediate aftermath
- Threshold test:
Would a person of reasonable fortitude have suffered the same reaction and injury as C?
Describe the third thing that must be proven:
The duty must be breached.
Describe the fourth thing that must be proven:
The negligence must cause the PI.