Mack (1994) - CL assumptions Flashcards

1
Q

Implicit CL assumptions (3)

Mack

A
  1. linearity - future loss proportional to claims to date&raquo_space; means that development factors are uncorrelated
  2. independence - AYs are independent
  3. variance - variance of next loss is a function of age and losses to date

Mack’s assumptions apply to cumulative losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Variance of next loss

A

variance of next cumulative loss = claims to date * alpha-subk^2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MSE of ultimate claims

A

MSE (ultimate claims) = ultimate^2 * sum [ (alpha-k^2 / age-to-age factor^2) * (1 / est. prior cumulative losses + 1 / sum(prior cum claims for all prior AYs x lates diagonal) ) ]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Alpha-k^2 formula and what it represents

A

alpha-k^2 = (1 / (I - k - 1)) * sum down col (current claims * (actual age-to-age - expected age-to-age)^2 )

represents variability in age-to-age factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Estimators for last alpha parameter (3)

A
  1. = 0 - only reasonable if development expected to be finished by end of triangle
  2. extrapolate the alpha series using loglinear regression
  3. assume the same relative change in subsequent alphas, alpha-I-1^2 = min( alpha-I-2^4 / alpha-I-3^2, min( alpha-I-3^2, alpha-I-2^2 ))
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

95% confidence interval for reserves under a normal distribution

A

(R-hat - 2 * s.e.(R-hat) , R-hat + 2 * s.e.(R-hat))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Problems with assuming reserves are normally distributed (2)

A
  1. poor distribution if data is skewed
  2. potential for a negative lower bound even if negative reserves are not possible (lognormal distribution corrects this)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lognormal confidence interval for reserves (and lognormal parameters)

A

exp( mu +/- t * sigma)

mu = ln(R-hat) - sigma^2 / 2

sigma^2 = ln( 1+ (s.e.(R-hat)^2 / R-hat^2) )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Alternate variance assumptions and corresponding variance proportionality implications (3)

A
  1. claims to date^2 weighting - age-to-age factor = sum( current claims * claims in next period ) / sum( current claims^2 )
    &raquo_space; variance proportional to 1
  2. normal volume weighted avg
    » variance proportional to claims to date
  3. simple average - age-to-age factor = (1 / (I - k)) * sum (claims in next period / current claims)
    » variance proportional to claims-to-date^2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Test for linearity assumption

Mack

A

plot claims in next period against claims to date and look for a straight line through the origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Test for variance assumption

Mack

A

plot weighted residuals against claims to date and look for a random scatter

weighted residual = (actual claims in next period - fitted claims in next period) / sqrt(variance proportionality assumption)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weaknesses of the CL method (2)

Mack

A
  1. age-to-age factors further out in the tail rely on very few observations
  2. known claims in latest AY form an uncertain basis for projecting to ultimate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Test for correlation between development factors

Mack

A

table of r’s and s’s:
use global test statistic to create a 50% confidence interval around T
» reject if T not in CI: (E[T] - .67 * sqrt(var(T)) , E[T] + .67 * sqrt(var(T)) )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
Correlation coefficient (T) for a pair of columns and global statistic
(Mack)
A

T-k = 1 - 6 * { sum(squared diff b/w r and s) / [ (I - k)^3 - I + k ] }

T = (I - k - 1) weighted average of T-k’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

E[T] and Var(T) formulas for correlation coefficient b/w development factors
(Mack)

A

E[T] = 0

Var(T) = 1 / [ (I - 2) * (I - 3) / 2]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Examples of CY effects and impacted Mack assumption (4)

Mack

A
  1. major claims handling changes
  2. case reserving changes
  3. substantial court decisions
  4. inflation

*CY effects violate AY independence

17
Q

Test for CY effects/AY independence

Mack

A

triangle of S’s, L’s, and *’s compared to median age-to-age factor, and count number per diagonal:
create a 95% CI around test statistic, Z
» reject if Z not in CI: ( E[Z] - 2 * sqrt(Var(Z)) , E[Z] + 2 * sqrt(Var(Z)) )

18
Q

S, L, Z, n, and m statistics for CY effects/AY independence test

A
S-j = # smaller than median on diagonal j
L-j = # larger than median on diagonal j
Z-j = min( S-j, L-j )
n = S-j + L-j
m = (n - 1) / 2 (truncated)
19
Q

E[Z] and Var(Z) for CY effects/AY independence test

Mack

A

E[Z-j] = n / 2 - ( n - 1 choose m) * n / 2^n

Var(Z-j) = n * (n - 1) / 4 - [ ( n - 1 choose m) * n * (n - 1) / 2^n ] + E[Z-j] - E[Z-j]^2

E[Z] = sum(E[Z-j]) and Var(Z) = sum(Var(Z-j)) b/c of independence assumption