memory Flashcards

1
Q

define coding

A

the way information is changed so that it can be stored in the memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 main ways that information can be encoded:

A

1) visual (picture)
2) acoustic (sound)
3) semantic (meaning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define capacity

A

how much info can be stored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define duration

A

the period of time information can last in the memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is short term memory (STM)?

A

your memory for events in the present or immediate past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is long term memory (LTM)?

A

your memory for events that have happened in the more distant past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why can’t we ask people what codes they are using?

A

coding happens unconsciously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does the STM code and how do we know?

A

acoustically → baddeley’s research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when did baddley’s research occur?

A

1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the aim of baddley’s research into STM

A

to examine whether coding in STM is primarily acoustic or semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what procedure did baddley use when investigating STM?

A

-75 participants were divided into 4 groups
-each group heard a list of five words drawn from one of the following categories
(acoustically similar words, acoustically dissimilar words, semantically similar words, semantically dissimilar words)

-immediately after hearing the 5 words they were asked to recall them in the correct order
-this procedure was repeated 4 times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

findings of baddeley’s research into STM

A

-participants given acoustically similar words performed the worst, with a 55%
accuracy
-they confused similar sounding words,
-semantically similar lists only produced a slight detrimental effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

conclusions from baddeley’s research into STM

A

since acoustically similar words were recalled the least efficiently, it
seems there is acoustic confusion in STM
-suggesting STM is coded acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how does the LTM code and how do we know?

A

semantically → baddeley’s research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the aim of baddley’s research into LTM

A

to examine whether coding in LTM is primarily acoustic or semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what procedure did baddley’s use while investigating LTM?

A

-same procedure as his original study, but instead gave his participants a 20-minute interval before recall (now testing LTM)
-during the interval, they conducted another task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

findings of baddeley’s research into LTM

A

-it was found that participants with semantically similar words performed the worst and had only 55% recall
-recall for other lists was 70-85%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

conclusions from baddeley’s research into LTM

A

-there is semantic confusion in LTM
-suggests that LTM is encoded semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

evaluations of baddeley’s research:

A

-good validity
-meaningful material was not used
-baddeley may not have tested LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ao3 baddeley’s research: good validity

A

P - a strength of Baddeley’s research into coding is that it has good validity

E - word length was standardised which eliminated some extraneous variables
↳ this allows us to establish cause and effect as we can be more certain that it is the changes in the types of words affecting recall and no other
factor

L - increases the internal validity of
baddeley’s findings into the coding in
memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

ao3 baddeley’s research: meaningful
material was not used

A

P - limitation of baddeley’s study is that meaningful material was not used

E - the words used in the study had no
personal meaning to participants
↳ this means that baddeley’s findings might not tell us much about coding in everyday life
↳ for example, people tend to use semantic coding even for STM tasks as they have a reason for trying to remember it (e.g. a shopping list)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

ao3 baddeley’s research: baddeley may not have tested LTM

A

P - baddeley may not have tested LTM

E - in the study, STM was tested by asking participants to recall a word list immediately after hearing it, LTM was tested by waiting 20 mins
↳ it is questionable whether this is really testing LTM

L - this casts doubt on the findings of the research into the coding of short and long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is the capacity of the STM and how do we know?

A

limited capacity, we can hold only a small amount of information before it is forgotten → jacobs/miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

when did jacobs carry out his research?

A

1887

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

who did jacob’s use in his study?

A

jacobs used a sample of 443 female students from the north london collegiate school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what procedure did jacob’s use to investigate the capacity of the STM?

A

-jacobs used a digit span test, to examine the capacity of STM for numbers and letters
-he read a list of either letters or numbers, with one syllable (‘w’ and ‘7’ were excluded)
-participants had to repeat back a string of numbers or letters in the same order and the number of digits/letters was gradually increased, until the participants could no longer recall the sequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

what were the findings of jacob’s research into STM?

A

-jacobs found that STM capacity for digits was 9 (9.3), whereas letters was 7 (7.3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

conclusion of jacob’s research into STM

A

-STM has a limited capacity of 5-9 digits and that numbers were easier to recall than letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what happens when new info comes into the STM?

A

the STM pushes out the old information (displacement) due to its limited capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

when did miller carry out his research?

A

1956

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

miller’s observations

A

-miller made observations of everyday practice
-he noted that things come in sevens: seven notes on the musical scale, seven days of the week, seven deadly sins
-miller thought that the capacity of STM is about 7 items, plus or minus 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

miller’s magic number

A

7 plus or minus 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

how did miller demonstrate his observations?

A

-he read list of digits to participants who immediately had to repeat back each list
in the right order
-the list increased in length 1 digit at a time – the maximum number of digits that could be recalled in the correct order is your immediate memory span

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

miller and chunking

A

-miller also noted that people can recall 5 words as easily as they can recall five letters through chunking (grouping sets of digits or letters into chunks)
-even though we can group individual
letters/number/notes to chunks, Miller argued we can still only hold 7+-2 ‘chunks’ of items
-a chunk of information such as an acronym or a date is equal to 1 piece of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

what is the capacity of the LTM and how do we know?

A

-unlimited capacity
-we know that our brains are not full of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

evaluation of jacob’s research

A

it was conducted a long time ago

37
Q

ao3 jacob’s study: it was conducted a long time ago

A

P - limitation is that it was conducted a long time ago

E - early research in psychology often lacked adequate controls of extraneous variables
↳ eg: some participants may have been
distracted while they were being tested so they didn’t perform as well

L - this could mean that the results into the capacity of STM may not be valid because there were confounding variables

C - other research, has been able to
replicate digit span studies in more controlled conditions
↳ this suggests that jacob’s and miller’s
study is a valid test of digit span on STM increasing the internal validity of the findings

38
Q

evaluation of miller’s research

A

-miller’s research may have overestimated the capacity of STM
-the capacity of STM is not the same for everyone

39
Q

ao3 miller’s study: miller’s research may have overestimated the capacity of STM

A

P - a limitation of miller’s research is it may have overestimated the capacity of STM

E - cowen (2001) reviewed other
research and concluded that the capacity of STM was only about 4 chunks
↳ this suggests that the lower end of miller’s estimate (5 items) is more
appropriate than 7 items
↳ although miller’s (1956) theory is supported by psychological research, he did not specify how large each ‘chunk’ of information could be and therefore we are unable to conclude the exact
capacity of STM

L - consequently, further research is required to determine the size of information ‘chunks’ to understand the exact capacity of STM

40
Q

ao3 miller’s study: the capacity of STM is not the same for everyone

A

P - the capacity of STM is not the same for everyone

E - jacobs also found that recall in the digit span test increased steadily with age
↳ 8 year olds could remember on average 6.6 digits whereas the mean for 19 year olds was 8.6
↳ this age increase may be due to an increase in brain capacity or that as you get older you develop strategies to improve digit span such as chunking

41
Q

what is the duration of STM and how do we know?

A

limited (about 18 secs) → peterson & peterson

42
Q

when was peterson and peterson’s study conducted?

A

1959

43
Q

the aim of peterson & peterson’s study into STM

A

to test how long the STM lasts when rehearsal is prevented

44
Q

who did peterson & peterson use in their study into STM?

A

they used 24 university students to participate in their study

45
Q

what procedure did peterson and peterson use to study STM?

A

-participants were shown a
trigram (consonant syllables) and asked to remember it,
-the trigrams were briefly presented to them
-after each trigram participants heard a number and had to count backwards in 3s to prevent them from rehearsal
-counting stopped after a number of time periods (3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds) -then participants had to try and recall
the trigram
-this was repeated a number of times using different trigrams

46
Q

why were consonants chosen?

A

the inclusion of vowels might have made the trigrams seem more word like, it is important that they are completely meaningless to the participant so they could not use their LTM (eg: BBC)

47
Q

findings of the peterson and peterson study into STM

A

-about 80% of the trigrams were correctly recalled after a 3
second retention interval
-dropping to 30% after 9 seconds
-3% after 18 seconds

48
Q

conclusion of peterson and peterson’s study into STM

A

if verbal rehearsal is prevented information, information lasts in STM for 18 seconds

49
Q

evaluations of peterson2 study into STM duration

A

-it was carried out in a laboratory setting
-lacks external validity

50
Q

ao3 peterson’s study: it was carried out in a laboratory setting

A

P - one strength of peterson and peterson’s study is that it was carried out in a laboratory setting

E - laboratory settings allows researchers to isolate the IV (trigram) and DV (recall) to test the duration of STM and remove possible extraneous elements variables (rehearsal) which would have influenced
participant’s recall of the trigram
↳ this tightly controlled procedure enabled researchers to find causal links between variables which can provide general laws of the duration of STM

L - we can replicate the research to check for reliability. this increases the validity of the research into the duration of STM

51
Q

ao3 peterson’s study: lacks ecoval

A

P - this method can be criticised for
lacking external validity

E – laboratory settings are very artificial in terms of the setting (controlling the IV and EVs) and the task
↳ if participants were asked to
remember everyday items like a shopping list, the duration of STM may be different

L –this research does not allow us to test
our STM in everyday situations which reduces the overall ecological validity of the study into the duration of STM

52
Q

what is the duration of the LTM and how dw we know?

A

unlimited/lasts as long as we live → bahrick at all

53
Q

what was the aim of bahrick at al’s research into LTM duration?

A

-establish the existence and duration of the LTM
-to see if there is any difference between recognition and recall

54
Q

who was used in bahrick at al’s study?

A

graduates from a high school in america

55
Q

what procedure was used during bahrick at al’s study into the duration of the LTM

A

-investigators tracked down graduates from a high school in america over a 50 year period
-392 graduates were shown photos from their school yearbook
-participants were aged between 17 and 74
-the time of graduation varied between 2 weeks to 57 years

they were split into 2 groups:
group 1 (recognition group) they were given a picture and a list of names, they had to select the correct name

group 2 (recall group) Asked to name the participants without the list of names

56
Q

results of bahrick at al’s study

A

group 1:
recognition of names and pictures and matching of names and pictures all remained high (90%) dropping to 70% after 48 years

group 2:
free recall was less accurate than recognition – 70% accuracy after 3 months, about 60% after 15 years, dropping to 30% after 48 years

57
Q

conclusions from bahrick at al’s study

A

people can remember certain types of information for almost a lifetime

58
Q

evaluations of bahrick at al’s study

A

-high external validity
-lacks population validity
-his research is unable to explain whether LTM becomes less accurate over time because of a limited duration, or whether LTM simply gets worse with age

59
Q

ao3 bahrick’s study: high external validity

A

P - bahrick’s study had high external validity

E - real life meaningful memories were studied, when lab studies were carried out with meaningless pictures to be remembered, recall rates were lower

L - this increases the validity of findings into duration of LTM

C - downside is that confounding variables are not controlled, bahrick’s participants may have looked at their yearbook photos and rehearsed
their memories over the years. this casts doubt on the accuracy of this research into duration of LTM

60
Q

ao3 bahrick’s study: lacks population validity

A

P - bahrick’s research used a sample of 392 american university graduates and therefore lacks population validity

E - psychologists are unable to generalise the results of bahrick’s research to other populations

L - we are unable to conclude whether other populations would demonstrate the same ability to recall names and faces after 47 years

61
Q

ao3 bahrick’s study: why does LTM get less accurate?

A

P - his research is unable to explain whether LTM becomes less accurate over time because of a limited duration, or whether LTM simply gets worse with age

E - psychologists are unable to determine whether our LTM has an unlimited duration (like the MSM suggests), which is affected by other factors such as getting old, or whether our LTM has a limited duration

62
Q

what is the MSM?

A

a theoretical model / a representation of our memory

63
Q

MSM layout:

A

sensory store → STM → LTM

64
Q

how does information go from the sensory store to the STM?

A

attention

65
Q

how is information kept in the STM?

A

rehearsal keeps it in the short erm storage and then be transferred to the LTM for potential indefinite storage

66
Q

what happens if information in the STM isn’t rehearsed?

A

it is transferred to the LTM

67
Q

how is information transferred from the LTM to STM?

A

retrieval

68
Q

key assumptions of the MSM:

A

-sensory register, STM and LTM are separate stores
-sensory register, STM and LTM are unitary stores (can’t be further subdivided)
-information passes from store to store in a linear sequential way (one after the other)
-rehearsal is needed to pass information from STM to LTM
LTM
-each store has its own characteristics in terms of coding, capacity and duration

69
Q

overview of the sensory register

A

-the first part of our memory where information is held
-whenever we sense environmental stimuli it goes to our sensory register

70
Q

does the sensory store only have one register?

A

-this part of memory comprises of several registers stores
-one for each of the five senses
-coding in each store is modality-specific (it depends on the sense)

71
Q

what is the store that codes acoustically?

A

echoic memory

72
Q

what is the store that codes visually?

A

iconic memory

73
Q

capacity of the sensory register

A

very high
↳ eg: over 100 million cells in each eye

74
Q

duration of the sensory store

A

less than half a second
↳ we only pay attention to a small amount of this information

75
Q

what is the STM used for?

A

immediate tasks

76
Q

define maintenance rehearsal

A

continuously repeating information over and over again to keep it in our STM

77
Q

what happens when new information enters our STM and what is it called?

A

displacement
old information disappears from STM if new information enters it

78
Q

elaborative rehearsal

A

the information to your existing knowledge

79
Q

if rehearsal is done enough information will…

A

transfer to our LTM

80
Q

what is meant by retrieval?

A

getting information out of the LTM and into the STM so it can be remembered

81
Q

how are retrieval and rehearsal fluid?

A

we may draw something out of our LTM to remember it when we need it, but then we can let it go back to our LTM after use

82
Q

ao3 strengths of the MSM:

A

-evidence from case studies
-evidence to support separate store assumption
-brain scans show that there is a difference between the STM & LTM

83
Q

ao3 weaknesses of the MSM:

A

-external validity of evidence of MSM could be criticised
-lack of evidence for unitary store assumptions
-rehearsal isn’t always need to transfer information to the LTM

84
Q

MSM strength: supporting evidence from patients with amnesia (+ counter about external validity)

A

S - a strength of MSM is that there is supporting evidence from case studies of patients with amnesia

E - HM and clive wearing both had severe damage and lost the ability to form new long-term memories
↳ both had normally functioning short term memories, but as STM only has a duration of up to 30 seconds anything that happened to them was completely forgotten.

L - this provides strong evidence that STM and LTM are completely separate entities in the human brain, and supports this assumption of the MSM

COUNTER:
↳ the evidence has come from case studies → low population validity
case studies only involve the study of one person (brain damage which is not representative of the general population)
↳ we cannot conclude with certainty whether memory is structured in the same way for everyone and whether other people process information in the same way, which threatens the validity of the MSM

85
Q

MSM strength: there is evidence to support that there are separate stores

A

P - there is evidence to support the assumptions of the MSM

E - there are controlled lab studies on coding, capacity and duration
↳ these support the existence of a separate STM and LTM stores, which is a key assumption of the MSM
↳ eg: peterson and peterson found that STM duration is 18-30 seconds and bahrick found that LTM has unlimited duration

L - STM is different to LTM in terms of duration, capacity and coding which supports this assumption of MSM; that the two from one another stores are separate and can function independent

86
Q

MSM strength: evidence from brain scans

A

P - evidence from brain scans has shown that there is a difference between STM and LTM

E - beardsley found the pre frontal cortex was active during STM tasks but not LTM, suggesting that these memories are stored and processed in different areas of the brain

L - different brain regions are responsible for the different components of the MSM, supporting the idea that our memory is made up of discrete stores

87
Q

MSM weakness: there a lack of evidence for the assumption that the LTM can’t be subdivided

A

P - there a lack of evidence for the assumption that STM & LTM are unitary stores

E - HM and clive searing both provide us with evidence that LTM is more complex than just one store
↳ HM had no episodic LTM but could still learn new procedures (golf) despite not remembering ever having done them, he would improve golf every time it was played

L - LTM seems to comprise of more than one component and therefore is not a unitary store
↳ goes against the assumption of MSM that the LTM can’t be sudivided

88
Q

MSM weakness: rehearsal is not always needed to transfer information to the LTM

A

P - rehearsal is not always needed to transfer information to the LTM

E - jenkins found that information which interesting, funny or personally relevant can be automatically’ lodged into our LTM without much effort or rehearsal required (incidental learning)

L - this suggests that not all information has to go through the transfer of maintenance and elaborative rehearsal for it to be stored in the LTM
↳ information does not always pass through each store in a linear way, which refutes this assumption of the MSM

89
Q

outline and evaluate the Multi-Store model of Memory (16 marks) - AO1

A

-MSM is a linear model of memory (information moves through each component in order)
-the MSM consists of the sensory register, STM and LTM. these are separate and unitary (can’t be subdivided)
-information from the senses is received by the sensory register which has a large capacity but a very short duration - it is modality free which means that it can code for all sense information
-if attention is paid to the information, the information moves to the STM
-this is a temporary store for information with a capacity of 7+/-2, a duration of 18-30 seconds and codes acoustically
-information will disappear from the STM if new information enters (displacement)
-if information in the STM is rehearsed then it can be retained in the STM and then be transferred to the LTM for potential indefinite storage
-LTM is the potentially permanent memory store for information that has been rehearsed for a prolonged time
-it has unlimited capacity and duration and codes semantically
-information can be retrieved from the LTM (getting information out of the LTM so it can be used by the STM)