Micro year 1 (part 3) Flashcards
What market failure is property rights most often used to fix
Tradegy of the commons related market failure
How do property rights actualy work to fix marker failures
- onwer of common access resource has incentive not to over expoloit land
- negative externalitie market failure internalised
- trespassers can be sued
what are some issues with using property rights in order to solve market failures
- hard to efficently distribute to firms
- enforcement is needed otherwise scheme breaks down
- Equity, who gets the right of ownership
write down the features of a market economy
- ownership: private
- Motive: Profit maximisation
- Freedom of choice: High
- Competition: High
- Role of goverment: Low
- Variety and quality of goods/services: High
- Response to demand: Quick
- Efficency: Allocative efficency, with some inefficency
- Merit goods: under provided
- Demerit goods: Over provided
- Public goods: missing markets
- Income distribution: Unequal
- Monopolies: Yes, they can exist
- Real world: No pure but USA and singapore very market orientated
write down the features of a command economy
- Ownership: Public
- Motive: Welfare motivated
- Freedom of choice: Low
- Competetion: Low
- Role of goverment: High
- Variety and quality of G/S: Low
- Shortage/surplus: yes, as no pricing mechanisms
- Merit goods: social optimum
- Demerit goods: social optimum
- Public goods: Allocated
- Income distribution: Equal
- Negative externalites: Social optimum
- Monopolies: None
- Real world: No pure command economys but countires like north korea and cuba are heavily command based
write down the features of a mixed economy
- Ownership: Public and private
- Motive: public-welfare maximisers, Private profit maximisers
- Freedom of choice: Pub-no, Pri-Yes
- Competetion: Pub-no, Pri-yes
- Role of goverment: Limited role, intervene when necessary
- Variety and quality of goods/services: Pub-low&low, Pri-High&HIgh
- Response to demand: Pub-slow, Pri-quick
- Efficency: Total efficency max
- Shortage/surplus: Pub-yes, Pri-no
- Merit goods: Goverment intervention
- Demerit goods: Goverment intervention
- Public goods: goverment intervention
- Income distribution: Progressive tax and welfare state
- Negative externalites: Goverment intervention
- Monopolies: Goverment intervention
- Real world: Majority of economies
What is a free market
Any place where buyers meet sellers to exchange goods and services, free from goverment intervention
what occurs at equilibrium in a free market, and how does it occur
Allocative efficency occurs at equilibirum,
- Resources perfectly follow consumer demand
- society surplus is maximised (the sum of producer and consumer surplus)
- Net social benefit is maximised (marginal social benefit=marginal social cost at equilibirum)
what are some pros of the free market
- Allocative efficency at equilibirum,
- Encourage competition, if a free market works well it can be highly competative
- High Dynamic efficency
- Job creation and economic growth is high
- Freedom, liberty, choice
- No risk of goverment failure
How are jobs created and how does economic growth come about from a free market
- In a free market quantity is at its maximum level and so due to labour being a derived demand you are going to see more job creation as more goods/services need to be produced
- Because quantity is high throughout the economy and the market is very competative you are going to see high quantitys being produced by every market in the economy and so real GDP is going to be driven up which would lead to economic growth
Why is dynamic efficency a pro of a free market and how does it come about
- In a highly competatative market your going to have a high level of dynamic efficency, this leads to reinvestment back into the business, such as investing in technology, R&D, Capital machinery upgrades.
- This is good news for consumers because we get brand new innovative goods/services with new technology.
- Overtime prices would fall because costs are lower for firms due to the technology advancement
- Quantity, quality, choice all improve
Why is allocative efficency a pro of a free market
- Left to free market forces, at equilibrium there will be allocative efficency
- You will never get long run disequilibirums because of the rationing, signalling, incentive functions of price means that any excess demand and excess supply will simply not exist
- ^This is good because shortages are major burdens on consumers and surpluses are massive burdens on firms and you wont get them
- Consumers will get exactly the quantity og goods/services they desire at whatever the market price is
Why is encouraging competition a pro of the free market
- In a highly competative market firms with be trying to keep their costs as low as possible and be passing these low costs onto consumers via lower prices
- In a highly competative market consumer surplus is high
- quantity is high, choice is high, quality is high all because firms are competing with eachother and to be most competative they must be giving consumers what they want
Why is freedom, liberity and choice a pro of a free market
- Individuals are free to live their life however they want to, they can consume the goods and services they want to with out being coersed and force into doing things the goverment says
Why is no goverment intervention a pro of free markets
- Without goverment intervention you will not be getting the costs of intervention and the risks of goverment failure
What are some cons of the free market
- Market can fail
- price may exclude people even though its efficent
- Excessive profitering
- Creative destruction
- Price volatility
Why is market fail a con of a free market and how can it come about
- allocative efficency not guarrented
- we assume competitive outcome, but could oligopoly or monopoly (we dont get competive benefits)
- what if info gaps in market, lead to irrational desicons
- if firms profit maximisers, loss making services (public goods) not allocated, externalities ignored
- consumers may ignore consumption based externalites