MIDTERM 1 Flashcards
TERMS/CONCEPTS
Goal of comparative psychobiology
to uncover common and divergent behavioral processes among species (including our own)
Aristotle
- Associative Learning
- Classifying animals. Some are smarter than others.
Descartes
The father of physiology
- how behavior is reduced in a reflexive manner
- mechanistic view of animal behavior
- humans share this reflexive behavior w/other animals
- cartesian dualism: belief that humans have something more like freewill
*Led the way for investigation of animal neurophysiology
Darwin
- Explained a mechanism for evolution to occur by (natural selection) but he did not discover evolution.
- No qualitative difference between humans and animals
- We can study comparative cognition because all animals share some common ancestors, thus mechanisms of behavior may be conserved across species
Mental continuity between humans and animals.
Convergent vs. Divergent Evolution
Convergent (Homoplasy): similar bodies/eco-niche traits, but different ancestors
The same trait appears but came about through very different lineages (e.g. camels & llamas)
This usually occurs when two different species are filling the same ecological niche
Divergent: same ancestors, different traits
Different traits appear in two species even though they shared a common ancestor (e.g. humans & chimps)
*KNOW the difference between convergent (homoplasy and divergent )
Romanes, Morgan, & Thorndike: Romanes
Romanes: cats rationalized door handle situation
Anthropomorphized the cognitive abilities of animals
Took anecdotal reports of single behaviors to be evidence of grand mental abilities
Romanes, Morgan & Thorndike: Morgan
Morgan (Morgan’s Canon): assume simpler (lower psychological ability) until proven otherwise. aka be skeptical AF
If we can come up with a simpler explanation over a more sophisticated explanation of the behavior, let’s choose the simpler one
*similar to parsimony
Romanes, Morgan & Thorndike: Thorndke
Romane’s methods are unscientific. We don’t know the history of the animal, one data point, etc.
Experimentally showed a cat could open a lever through simple trial and error
*he’s criticizing Romanes’ evaluation (cat will do the same through trial and error)
Tinbergen’s four “Whys” (inherited from Aristotle’s four “causes”)
- Adaptive significance • What is the behavior good for?
- Phylogenetic history • How did the behavior evolve?
- Neurological and psychological mechanisms • How does the behavior work?
- Developmental processes • What experiences and genetic makeup cause the animal to behave as it does?
how animals are classified: Linnaean system
Kingdom Animalia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Class Mammalia Subclass Placentalia Order Primates Family Hominidae Genus Homo Species Sapiens
TINBERGEN’S FOUR WHY’S
- Adaptive Significance (evolutionary, proximate)
- what is the behavior good for? - Phylogenetic History (evolutionary, generational)
- how did the behavior evolve? - Mechanisms: Neurological and Psychological
- how does the behavior work? - Developmental (ontogeny) processes (proximate
- what experiences and genetic makeup cause the animal to behave as it does
Phenotype
observed trait (morphology, physiology, behavior, etc.)
Genotype
genetic information contributing to phenotype
Phenotype is the product of the ongoing, dynamic coaction of genes (i.e., genotype) and environmental experience.
Polygenic traits
Most traits are the product of the expression of many genes.
many different genes contribute to a particular behavior
Pleiotropy
When a gene influences multiple traits.
Direct fitness
of direct offspring
Indirect fitness
of offspring relatives have + own offspring’s kids (grandkids)
Direct + Indirect fitness
= inclusive fitness
Kin selection
traits that increase inclusive (both direct and indirect fitness) fitness will be selected for
Ontogeny
development of an individual (occurs during the individual’s lifetime)
Neoteny
Juvenile features in animals
*think playful adult dogs
Slower rate of development in descendent than in ancestor.
Example: Salamander evolution
In amphibians, gills in larval stage, not in adult stage.
Some salamanders retain gills as adults. The adult is tadpolelike and is aquatic.
Phylogeny
the evolutionary history of a group of organisms
origin of taxa (evolution occurs in populations across generations)
Parsimony
Least amount of steps, shortest path
taxon/taxa
any grouping in the Linnean hierarchy (genus, species, family, etc.)
*think classification of species
Morphological
Characterizes a species by body shape and other structural features
*used when common ancestor is unknown
Morphology
similar body shape (problematic for classification of species because of convergence)
Plesiomorpy
ancestral traits (old trait)
Apomorphy
derived trait (i.e., new trait)
Symplesiomorphy
shared ancestral trait
Synapomorphy
shared derived trait (shared new trait) **most useful
Cladistics: Two forms of similarity in traits
- Homology: similar because of common ancestor (like family)
- Homoplasy: similar because of convergent evolution (think echo niche)
Homology
similar because of common ancestor
Homoplasy
similar because of convergent evolution
*think of echo nice
Autapomorphy
unique derived trait
cladistics
the study of the evolutionary relationships of organisms based on the rule of parsimony and that only monophyletic groups deserve taxonomic status.
study of common ancestors amongst organisms using parsimony and monophyletic groupings.
Monophyletic group
a group containing all descendants of their most recent common ancestor; in cladistics, the only valid grouping.
*gold standard, what biologist aspire to, we try to find this with parsimony
paraphyletic grouping
look the same, groups by some ancestors, but not most recent; invalid because it excludes most recent common ancestors.
based on looks, but not recent family history aka this is a no, no
a group not consisting of all descendants of their most recent common ancestor; in cladistics, this is an invalid grouping because it does not express evolutionary relationships (reptilia excludes birds and animals)
Polyphyletic group
grouped by looks, but from different familias–biggest no, no.
a group consisting of two or more distantly related species (an extreme of paraphyly); In cladistics, invalid
ex. the grouping of birds and mammals in haemothermia
a group of taxa derived from different ancestors
Phylogenetic Trees
includes time
can estimate timeline in common ancestors (like chimps and humans about 5 million years ago)
but cladogram is agnostic (does not care) about time, it does have order of evolution and separation, but not specific times
Node
on a phylogenetic tree, a hypothetical ancestor, the place where two branches intersect
Synapomorphy
shared, derived (NEW) characteristic, useful in determining how taxa are related
more than one individual has the ancestral trait
apes & humans (new apomorphy lack a tail –> ancestral trait (Plesiomorpy) have tails
Symplesiomorphy
shared primitive (OLD) characteristic, not useful in determining how taxa are related
(Plesiomorpy) Old trait –> tails
Homoplasy
two species have a trait they share, but through independent (convergent) evolution
*think echo niche
Haeckel
Species similarity greatest at conception and decreases during embryogenesis.
Funnel-like model
**most support for Haeckel because the highest expression of genes is at the beginning and then a linear decrease
von Baer
proposed TWO stages where there are major differences in species development.
Phylotypic – greatest similarity
hourglass model with Hox genes in the middle
How are new phenotypes produced?
Natural Selection acts on phenotypic variation, not genetic variation.
- Changes in phenotypes are results of the environments not genetics
- Changes to individual caused by environment not gene
- Changes to a population caused by mutation and not the environment
Haeckel and von Baer Takeaway
not just about gross-level morphology, the constraints would be strongest at the very beginning and then lessen later
Environmental Modulation of Genes during Development Takeaway
good vs bad home environment correlated CHRM2 gene expression
attentive environment = minimal externalizing behavior
neglectful environment = more externalizing behavior
effects of CHRM2 are moderated by parental monitoring (environment)