Midterm Part 1 Flashcards
Marx
- Marx thought that the worst thing about capitalism is that people had private property, ownership of means of productions like lands and factories.
- He thought we should abolish inheritance so we could solve hunger and poverty because not everyone has an inheritance.
- The communist manifesto presents us with the theory of social change and social movement.
What are the 5 key elements of Social Movements?
- They challenge/defend structures or systems of authority.
a. Includes states or national governments, Non-governmental organizations like companies, corporations, Includes universities or world bank.
b. 2 things of all these systems of authorities
- They are all recognized seats of regulations, procedures, and guidelines that influence some aspect of the lives of individuals
- Systems of authorities are typically based on underlined sets of interconnected values beliefs and interpreted frameworks that work to rationalize their authority. - They are collective actors
- Involves a number of individuals, groups, or organizations engaged in coordinated conjoined action - They are extra-institutional challenges
a. Distinguishes social movements from other group actions like :
- crowd behavior ex the wave at a sporting event
- Rioting is not a social movement
- Interest group behavior
b. A social movement is when the challenges that group mounts is held outside the institution
- An interest group for ex. Planned parenthood is involved in different social movements for their own benefits to promote themselves - They are organized activities
- They are organized and coordinated actions to produce change or reach a common goal - They have some temporal continuity
- Unlike a riot they don’t just break out, they are not spontaneous they are planned and organized but are not regularly scheduled events
What is a social movement
collective behavior that is purposeful, organized, and institutionalized but not ritualized.
Difference between Social rituals vs. social movements.
Rituals always occur and aren’t organized
Social movements are organized.
What are the states of social movements?
- Emergence: when the social problem being addressed is first identified
- Coalescence: resources are mobilized and concrete actions are taken around the problems outlined in stage 1
- Routinization: the movement becomes institutionalized and a formal structure develops to promote the cause.
Ex states of social movments in HIV Movement
Emergence: February 1981- doctors identified a new disease among otherwise healthy gay men, initially called “gay-related immune deficiency” (GRID)
Coalescence: June 1981-a group of concerned activists founded the Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC), the organization around which a movement formed
Routinization:1982- the GMHC established an office in NYC and published a newsletter. GRID was renamed “acquired immunodeficiency syndrome” (AIDS). By 1988, GHMC organized the first “AIDS day” (12/1)
what were some of the early theories of social movements? (pre 1970s theorist)
- People used to think that individuals who joined SM were aligned or had psychological needs
- People who were unhappy with society would join SM
- Focused on the individuals
- Today this has changed, scholars see movements as healthy and good political engagements
Who was Mohammed Bouzazizi?
- Dec 17,2010 a Tunisian street vendor set himself on fire protesting the illegal seizure of the goods he was selling and repeated harassment at the hands of state officials
- Bouazizi’s act is widely held as the “spark” that ignited the Tunisian Revolution which ultimately led to a change in political power in the country and a social movement that continues today—Arab Spring
What a mobilizing grievances ?
- grievances that are shared among some number of actors, be they individuals or organizations, and that are felt to be sufficiently serious to warrant not only collective complaint but also some kind of corrective, collective action
- Felt to be serious enough that’s more than just “I don’t like this”, something up another level.
- Super important for generating these deeply shared grievances
- Big answer to the question why social movements occur
- Also feel deeply aggrieved from the success of the other social movement.ex pro life vs abortion rights they are both scared of the success of the other group because they are fighting for the complete opposite
Where do mobilizing grievances come from?
-Grievances are ubiquitous and irrelevant
We all have grievances and issues that we don’t like about life or society therefore because they are so common they are irrelevant and not needed to create a social movement. Relatively inconsequential for the development of social movements
not really about the grievances but if they have the resources to really mobilize.
Individual grievances warrant collective action, we just put up with these individual grievances
Don’t really talk about the grievance itself but rather talk about the resources.
-Grievances are a function of material conditions : (whether one has material conditions or lack of
-Grievances as a function of social psychological factors
This calls attention to certain psychological perspective
Structural and material conditions are ignored.
Its general, some people have access to some things others not
If a certain psychological state is realized, then that’s when a mobilizing grievance
When a certain level of frustration is reached, it will seek release, even if the target of the problem isn’t used
What is the grievance caused by conflict/inequality?
-Where you have people in an antagonistic position
Mobilizing grievances are done because of the uneven distribution of some kind of reward that impacts our opportunities and life chances in society
Ex. Marx depicted a capitalist society of 2 competing groups, the haves and the haves not, always class conflict. No other issue that was more important or more unifying
This is overly simplistic
what is the strain theory?
- underlying grievances flourish because of social trends and changes that rearranges the way things have been.
- Developed by Durkheim
What are the three thesis that derive from the strain theory?
- breakdown theory
- absolute deprivation theory
- quotidian distribution theory
Breakdown thesis
- SM emerge from breakdown of existing social patterns
- that disruptive social changes loosen the threads of social constraint, the social fabric of our lives are weakened
- The things that bring us together that bring solidarity, so that social changes weaken the social fabric
- When we feel that strain that our society is not cohesive we go in to social movements. This strain turns into grievances which lead to the emergence of social movement
- Rather than emerging from two groups in conflict with each other, social movements emerge from existing social patterns
Absolute Deprivation Thesis
-argues that people are in such a bad spot that things get so bad that people can’t take it anymore, they reach their breaking point that people mobilize
-Research on this has been mixed:
Its hard to mobilize if you are at an absolute zero.
Maybe certain ones create these social movements.
Quotidian distribution thesis
-Developed by sociologist David Snow
He argues that some disruptions may be more likely than others to create a movement.
-That there are some certain grievances that come together to create a social movement
-Snow argues that when patterns of everyday life are disrupted. When your everyday life gets disrupted that’s when you have a mobilizing grievance
Ex kids at Parkland High, shootings are disrupting their everyday routine of going to school without being scared about getting shot. Be able to do these normal things that people are able to do without getting shot
-also includes natural disasters.
-also argues that most of them at their core are fighting for something they had and its being lost. can also be a shift in resources or change in social control
What are the similarities between the black panther movement and black lives matter?
- both were a response to police brutality. police brutality was the mobilizing grievance, the spark
- both SM focus on networks to emerge
What are the differences between the black panther movement and the black lives matter?
-Black panther used violence, black lives did not
-Black panther did more community outreach
Black panther had formal rules and processors but black lives does not
-Black panther included only people of color but black lives includes multiracial people
Framing processes of SM
-views social movements not merely as carriers of existing ideas and meanings but as important signifying agents engaged in meaning making.
a.Culture turn in all mean making. Meaning is not objective it’s social produced and reproduced continually
-Meanings are not natural/automatic. Rather, they arise through interpretative processes mediated by culture
This is why representation matters. Ex when a white person commits a murder vs. a black person commits a crime framed in different ways, different adjectives are used to describe the people.
-The perspective of how we frame things vary
Ex: when a black person commits a crime, this event is framed one way but if a white person commits a crime, it is framed another way
Framing and social movements
-Meanings associated with relevant events are contestable and negotiable; they are open to debate and differential interpretation
These grievances don’t emerge natural but rather are the result of interactable based interpretations. So situations are being framed as something that should be seen as a grievance.
(Rather than people naturally feeling a way, you have an event being framed in a particular way to encourage this movement.)
Ex. 9/11: we didn’t know what happened, so President Bush and police officers framed it as a terrorist attack so we could all understand it.
-The very framing conceptualizes the activist, the leaders, that are constantly doing work to frame something in a particular way and it takes maintenance
Diagnostic framing
-Problematization : this assess a social movement as something that needs to change ex gun control, people are threatened because they think their guns are going to be taken away.
-Blame: blames others to mobilize grievances
Ex NIMBY, when they residents in a neighborhood were trying to prevent a homeless shelter to be built in their neighborhood, they couldn’t blame the salvation army because they are a Christian organization, so they decided to put the blame on homeless men and they framed them as sex crazed druggies, who were going to enter their neighborhood and rape women and molest kids. Salvation Army provided lots of data to take the blame off of homeless men, but it didn’t work
Presenting people with data and sutff only make people dig their feet in more. Rather than being rational its more effective to connect with people on an emotional level to change their mind. another ex trump framing immigrants as criminals