nuisance Flashcards

1
Q

private nuisance

A
  • an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land (winfield)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

three possible claimants in a nuisance case

A
  • owner
  • occupier
  • someone with a legal or equitable title in the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

hunter v canary wharf confirmed…

A
  • only people with legal property rights can make a claim in nuisance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

defendant

A
  • created or authorised the nuisance (tetley v chitty)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

three elements of nuisance

A
  • an unlawful use of land
  • which leads to a direct interference
  • with C’s use or enjoyment of land (damage must be caused)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

unlawful use of land (obj.)

A

courts consider several factors:
- duration
- time of day
- locality
- sensitivity of the claimant
- malice
- public benefit
- recreational activities
- human rights act 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

duration

A
  • general rule: if it’s a one off event, you can’t claim (bolton v stone)
  • de keyser v spice bros)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

time of day

A
  • what time of day is the nuisance carried out?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

locality

A
  • is C close to the nuisance? (sturges v bridgman)
  • thesiger: “what would be a nuisance in belgrave square would not be a nuisance in bermondsey”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

malice

A
  • malicious intent = more unreasonable (christie v davey)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

sensitivity of the claimant

A
  • decided objectively (reasonable man)
  • not liable for sensitive claimants (robinson v kilvert)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

public benefit

A
  • seriousness of interference is balanced against public benefit (miller v jackson)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

recreational activities

A
  • interference with C’s rec. activities unlikely to be deemed as unreasonable (hunter v canary wharf)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

human rights act 1998

A
  • right to private family life (marcic v thames water)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

indirect interference

A
  • something done on D’s land which impacts on the use or enjoyment of C’s land
    -e.g: fumes, loud noises, pollution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

use or enjoyment of land

A
  • actual damage: physical damage to property (st helens smelting v tipping)
  • intangible damage: C’s loss of enjoyment of their land (hunter v canary wharf)
16
Q

defences

A
  • statutory authority
  • planning permission
  • coming to nuisance is no defence
  • act of a stranger
  • prescription
17
Q

statutory authority

A
  • act of parliament authorises nuisance (hammersmith railway brand)
18
Q

planning permission

A
  • might be considered as a defence, but not always (coventry v lawrence)
19
Q

coming to nuisance is no defence

A
  • bliss v hall
20
Q

act of a stranger

A
  • if a stranger creates the nuisance, D is not liable
20
Q

prescription

A
  • 20 years no complaint, no nuisance (sturges v bridgman)
21
Q

remedies

A
  • damages (st helens smelting v tipping)
  • injunctions: preventative orders (kennaway v thompson)