physical field work (rivers) (paper 3) Flashcards

1
Q

the location of our study area…

A

the bed burn beck which is a tributary of the river wear , it flows through hamsterly forrest which is quite a rural area of county durham in the north east of england

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the enquiry question

A

hypothesis - flood risk along the river wear increases downstream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why were the sites we chose appropriate

A

they were accessible by mini bus

the sites were far apart enough to show changes in the channel and drainage basin characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what were the limitations of the chosen sites

A

we only investigated sites in the upper course on a tributary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is primary data

A

infomation that you collect yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

primary data we measured

A

velocity of the river

field sketch

width

gradient

depth

sediment survey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

field equipment we used …

A

ranging poles

tape measure

clinometer

ping pong balls

powers scale of roundness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is secondary data

A

infomation that someone else has previously collected and made available e.g on the internet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is Geographical Information System (GIS)

A

a way of displaying special data e.g a map with a flood risk layer on top

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

secondary data sources i could use

A

land use map

geology map

drainage survey maps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

measurement errors

A

mistakes made by using the equipment incorrectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

operator errors

A

caused by the person collecting the data e.g a difference in opinion/ personal bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is accuracy

A

how precise the data is and how close to the true value the data is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is reliability

A

how correct the data is and how repeatable the results are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

weather conditions and dar of fieldwork

A

22nd of june 2023

weather was hot and dry , june was warmer than average for the uk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

width - method , explanation and evaluation

A

method - we stretched a tape measure from one bank to another holding it tawt above the surface of the water

explanation - width was measured to calculate the discharge, the wider the river the greater the discharge. where the discharge is highly , flooding is more likely

eval - sometimes the tape measure sagged in the middle , reducing the accuracy of the width data

17
Q

depth - method, explanation, evaluation

A

method - we used a metre ruler to measure the depth at 10 different points , we divided the width of the river by 10 to use a systematic sample

explanation - depth was measured to calculate discharge, the deeper the river the greater the discharge

eval - the meter ruler sank into the soft mud on the river bed , reducing the accuracy of the data

18
Q

velocity - method , explanation, evaluation

A

method - we used the float method to measure the speed of the river , we placed 2 ranging poles 2 metres apart and timed the ball

explanation - velocity was measured to calculate the discharge , the faster the river the greater the discharge

eval - we did 3 velocity readings at each site and calculated an average , this improved the accuracy of the data
somethings the balls got stuck on the banks , a flow meter would have been more accurate

19
Q

how to calculate discharge

A

velocity X (width x depth)

20
Q

gradient - method, explanation, evaluation

A

method - measured a distance of 2 metres using a tape measure and marked it using 2 ranging poles, we used a clinometer to measure the gradient in degrees

explanation - the steeper the gradient of the drainage basin the less infiltration there is and the quicker rain water gets into the river, increasing flood risk

eval - we had never used a clinometer before so may have used it incorrectly, sometimes the ranging poles were tilted instead of vertical
these factors reduce the accuracy of the data

21
Q

sediment survey - method, explanation, evaluation

A

method - we selected one rock next to each depth reading and measured it’s longest edge, we then used powers scale of roundness to categorise the rock into class 1-6

explanation - the smaller and rounded the sediment the more erosion is taking place , where there is a lot of erosion the river has more energy and therefore is more likely to flood

eval - there were operator errors because people were more likely to pick up larger rocks and there was some disagreement about the powers class, this reduces accuracy

22
Q

drainage basin characteristics (field sketch) - method , explanation and evaluation

A

method - we observed the river at each site and drew its main features, we added annotations to describe the environment

explanation - land use shows the value of land , the higher value the land the greater the risk if it’s flooded . The vegetation cover shows how much interception will take place, more vegetation reduces the risk of flooding

eval - a sketch allows you to focus on specific features that are relevant to your study , they also provide a visual reminder when analysing results