Pinter Critics Flashcards

Learn Pinter Critics

1
Q

Pinter on War/Cold War

A

Two people knocking at the door and taking them away…more and more real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cavendish on genre

A

Logic of a nightmare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Billington on time

A

It is a private, obsessive work about time past; about some vanished world, either real or idealised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Billington on Stanley

A

tantrum-filled child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Billington on 1950s

A

the persistence of these questions tells us a lot about the culture of the 1950s in which works of art were still expected to provide rational answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bill Naismith

A

the comic contrast of Jew and Irish man is pushed to the limit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

E.T Kirby

A

consciousness occupies and qualifies space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pinter on Goldberg and McCann

A

Goldberg and McCann? Dying, rotting, scabrous, the decayed spiders, the flowers of our society. They know their way around. Our mentors. Our ancestry. Them. Fuck ‘em

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lloyd Evans

A

Goldberg and McCann are often performed as two halves of a double act but here they’re carefully differentiated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Billington on Goldberg

A

Smiling bonhomie conceals a profound insecurity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ian Shuttleworth on Petey

A

comfortably nondescript

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Martin Esslin on Petey

A

tongue-tied…imbecility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cavendish on Lulu

A

a rather one-note brassy local lass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pinter on Stanley

A

spirit of defiance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Shuttleworth on Stanley

A

palpable streak of viciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Matt Oliver on Meg and Stanley

A

the ambiguous relationship between the two…is characterised by sudden shifts in power

17
Q

Matt Oliver on Stanley

A

instead of the deep, malevolent laughter of a villain, we hear the muffled ‘giggle’ of a boy in the darkness

18
Q

Pinter on language

A

language becomes a permanent masquerade, a tapestry of lies

19
Q

Times Critic

A

After a while we tend to give the puzzle up in despair

20
Q

Simon Henderson

A

In Pinter words are not bridges: they are bars to protect the wired enclosure of the self

21
Q

John Russell Brown on Silence

A

it is in the silences that they (characters) are most evident

22
Q

Esslin on Communication

A

communication is difficult if not impossible

23
Q

Pinter on meaning

A

meaning begins in the words…and ends nowhere

24
Q

John Russell Brown on comedy

A

[Pinter’s comedy] is about the same things as his scenes of terror, the inability…to make contact with each other

25
Q

Billington on Lulu

A

chiefly there to remind us of Goldberg’s predatoriness

26
Q

Matt Oliver on Games

A

the fact that Goldberg appears to be using the games as euphemisms for sex acts makes his interest in Lulu troubling, with strong suggestions of paedophilia

27
Q

Martin Esslin on Meg and Stanley

A

Meg treats him with a motherliness so stifling as to be almost incestuous

28
Q

Esslin on Meg

A

grotesquely playing the belle of the ball

29
Q

Shuttleworth on Meg

A

ageing coquette