Pleadings, Default, challenge, sanctions Flashcards

1
Q

FRCP 8 (a) Claim for relief

A

Claim for relief must contain
1.) A short and plain statement of the grounds for the courts jdx, unless the court already has jdx and the claim needs not new jdx
-e.g. counterclaim, court already has jdx
2. ) A short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and
-ID elements of COA
-Set forth facts that satisfy elements of COA

  1. ) A demand for the relief sought; which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FRCP 8(d) Pleading to be concise and direct; Alternative, Inconsistency

A

-In general, each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct. No technical form is required

-Alternative statements: A party may set out 2 or more statements of claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically. If party makes alternative statements, pleading is sufficient if any one is sufficient
Inconsistent claims or defenses: a party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FRCP 13 Compulsory counterclaim

A

A pleading must state as a counterclaim any claim –that at the same time of its service–the pleader has against opposing party
Arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is subject matter fof the opposing party’s claim and
Does not require adding another party over whom the court cannot acquire jdx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FRCP 13: Permissive counterclaim:

A

A pleading may state a counterclaim against an opposing party any claim that is not compulsory (arises out of a different transaction/occurrence)
* Defendant not allowed to bring up unless there is SMJ
*No supplementary jdx applies, must meet AIC and have SMJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FRCP 13: crossclaim against co-party

A

A pleading may state as a crossclaim any claim by one party against a coparty(co-defendant) if the claim arises out of the transaction/occurrence that is the subject matter of the original action or of a counterclaim. May include claim that the coparty is or may be liable to cross claimant for all or part of a claim asserted in action against crossclaim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defendant options after complaint is filed

A

-Do nothing
-Challenge sufficiency of complaint MTD 12(b)(6)
-File answer: admit or deny, assert affirmative defenses (SOP/PJ/Venue, etc), counterclaim [separate], crossclaim [separate document]
-If court orders, respond to answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FRCP 9 Fraud and Mistake

A

A party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. Malice, intent, knowledge and other conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally

-More details/specificity required, less allegation
-“Heightened pleading” standard
must allege more specifically when, where, and how the fraud was committed
-state with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FRCP 12 (b)(6): Challenge sufficiency of claim with Iqbal/Twambly (plausible pleading) standard

A

Failure to state claim upon which relief can be granted

District court should disregard all conclusory allegations and, accepting all remaining allegations as true, decide whether the complaint states a plausible claim for relief.

Plead facts to nudge the claim “across the line from conceivable to plausible.”

A complaint contains enough factual allegations to show that the claimed violation is plausible, not just possible/ state a plausible claim for relief.

Plaintiff must allege D acts are more consistent wrongful/illegal conduct.

Factual allegations to support plausible inference of _______

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Liberality in pleading

A

Liberality of pleading: want people to have their day in court and dont want to throw cases out for technicalities→ why pleadings don’t require too much specificity and parties are allowed to amend complaints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Default

A

Defendant is served with complaint and fails to file a response in any way that is permitted. They wait until time to answer expires (Federal: 21 days, State 30 days)

1.) Plaintiff must request to have default entered against defendant, not automatic: defendant can file answer until plaintiff enters default against defendant

2.) Plaintiff must give notice of default
3.) If default entered, must apply to court for judgment (“default judgment”)
4.) Legal effect: defendant can no longer participate in action unless they set aside judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FRCP 55: Entering a default

A

When a party asking for relief in a complaint has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default

(1) By the clerk: If sum of $ is certain [or can be made certain] by compilation and affidavits
If entered by clerk→ this is default judgment, no need to request from court

(2) By the court: in all other cases, the party must apply to the court for a default judgment. Party must be served w/ written notice of application w/in 7 days before the hearing .

(3) Setting aside default or default judgment: court may set aside an entry of default for good cause, and it may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Default judgment

A

After default is entered, plaintiff must request default judgment from court (another warning to defendant because party should not win on technicalities)

-Entered by clerk–on claims like credit card debt, and narrow group of cases

-Entered by court–not automatic: Uses affidavits, declarations, live testimonies if more evidence
Holds brief trial (most commonly on quiet title)

-If defendant has filed M2D but has not filed answer → No DEFAULT
-If defendant has served an answer but did not file it → DEFAULT allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

FRCP 60 (b) set aside default judgement

A

On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
1.) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect
2. )Newly discovered evidence
3. ) Fraud, misrepresentation
4.) Judgment is void – No SMJ

***Motion must be made:
Within reasonable time, or
No more than a year after entry of judgment

A judge can set conditions to grant motion, i.e reimburse plaintiff attorney fees for wasted time, file within 5 days, etc.

*CA if it was the lawyer’s fault the court has to set aside; motion must also include answer

“Under Rule 60, the court may set aside a default judgment if the judgment were entered as a result of defendant’s “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” This rule is applied liberally to avoid forfeitures and to make sure that litigants have their day in court. A motion to set aside a default judgment under Rule 60 must be brought within a reasonable time, and in any case no later than one year after the default.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Default jurisprudence - Philosophy (court factors for motion to set aside)

A

1.) “The law abhors forfeiture,” law favors full and hair hearings on the merits
2. ) Plaintiffs have a duty to prosecute and parties have a duty to follow the rules
3. ) Standard is “good cause”
4. ) If default entered but no judgment yet, move quickly +good reason, court likely to not enter judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Challenging in Federal Court

A

-Motion to strike 12(f): “Im not answering complaint until all offensive material is removed”

-Motion to dismiss 12(b)(6): failure to state a claim

-Motion for more definite statement 12(e): pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response

-Answer (most common)- 8 (b)(c): admit/deny, raise affirmative defenses

-Counterclaim 13: “if you’re suing me, i am suing you”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

FRCP 8 (b): Defenses, Admissions and Denials

A

In general, in responding to a pleading, a party must:
1.) State in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it, and
2.) Admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party

17
Q

FRCP 8 (c): Affirmative Defenses

A

In responding to pleading a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense including:

-Accord and satisfaction; arbitration and award; assumption of risk; contributory negligence; duress; estoppel; failure of consideration; injury of fellow servant; laches; license; payment; release; res judicata; fraud, illegality, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver.

**purpose is to avoid unfair surprise at trial

18
Q

FRCP 12(f): Motion to strike:

A

Court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. The court may act:
1.) Own its own; or
2.) On motion made by party either before responding to the pleasing or if no response is allowed, within 21 days after being served with pleading

19
Q

FRCP 12

A

(a)(1)(A)(i) Time to serve a responsive pleading: A defendant must serve and answer within 21 days after being served with a S&C

(b) How to present defenses: Every defense to claim must be asserted in a responsive pleading (pre-answer motion or answer). But party may assert the following (pre-answer) defenses by motion:

(1) Lack of SMJ (raised any time)
(2) Lack of PJ
(3) Improper venue
(4) Insufficient process
(5) Insufficient SOP
(6) Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
≠ pleading defenses in the answer

20
Q

FRCP 12 (g)(2) Joining motions, limitation on further motions

A

… A party that makes motion under this rule must not make another motion under this rule raising defense or objection that was available to the party but omitted from its earlier motion→

***all motions must be raised together at the same time in an answer or in motions to dismiss. “You snooze, you lose”

21
Q

Pre-answer motions v. answer (with affirmative defenses.

Challenging in Federal court

A

Options: Alternatives
1. ) Pre-answer MTD (to avoid answer if prevail): optional, but if used must raise all challenges/affirmative at once→ PJ/Venue/SOP (all fatal) have to be in first pleading → otherwise waive; OR
-Strong tactical advantage to avoid admitting damaging allegation or having to investigate
2. ) Answer: deny/admit, affirmative defenses can be raised here instead
Only get one MTD

22
Q

FRCP 12(b) Defenses results

A

-If no SMJ→ case dismissed

-If no PJ→ party w/no PJ dismissed ( plaintiff can sue dismissed defendant where there is PJ)

-If venue improper, can be transferred to where proper (w/in court system) or dismissed altogether

-Insufficient SOP → plaintiff serve defendant again

-If court finds failure to state upon which relief can be granted→ court allow plaintiff to amend their complaint→ if cannot amend → court will dismiss case

23
Q

Virgin Records v. Lacey

A

Holding: Defendant received enough warnings to defend her case, and still decided to do nothing. Demonstration that her default was intentional. Default judgment is limited by the damages requested in the complaint.

Facts: Defendant was downloading copyrighted music, never responded to SOP, plaintiff requested entry of default → default judgment

24
Q

Matos (12(b)(6))

A

Holding: A scandalous matter cannot merely offend someone’s sensibilities, it must improperly cast a person in a cruelly derogatory light. / “A complaint need not be a literary gem” / A complaint can merely provide enough info to allow a defendant to frame a responsive pleading

Facts: Truck rolled over. 12(b)(6) standard – a court must accept as true all factual allegations of a complaint (but not conclusory allegations. 12(f) standard – a court may strike from a pleading

25
Q

Waiver of defenses timeline

A

-SMJ: never
-Failure to state claim/join a required party: until trial ends
-PJ/Venue/SOP: until pre-answer motion, an if none, until answer is served or amended

26
Q

FRCP 11: Sanctions : applies only to written submissions not oral arguments

CCP 128.7 based on 11

A

(a) A pleading must be signed by attorney of record/oneself; the individual must provide address, email address, and phone number, if there is no signature, a court may strike the document unless it is promptly corrected

(b) Signature means that pleading was not presented for (1) improper purposes (harassment elongate process, increase the cost of litigation); (2) & (3) that claims are based on law and fact; (4) and that denial of factual contentions warranted on evidence are reasonably based on belief/lack of information

*only applies to written submissions in the fact and law
*lawyers love to ask for sanctions

27
Q

***Safe Harbor exception

A

Gives offending lawyer opportunity to correct

Served on offeding party→ have 21 days to withdraw before Rule 11 motion is filed with the couty

Offending party corrects (w/21 days ) or ignores

If withdraws→ NO sanctions

If ignores→ file motion with court

28
Q

Frivolous lawsuit

A

Unfounded lawsuit with improper purpose// King v. Whitner (baseless political allegations)

What is the cause of action? What is required by the case of action? Research!

Stop and think what you are signing – is it frivolous?

Rules can sometimes be broken if there is a founded reason to have done so (pandemic example)

29
Q
A