political parties paper 1 Flashcards
how does policy formulation support democracy?
-ensures electorate have meaningful choice as parties have different policies
-manifestos give the electorate smth to hold the gov accountable
-participation and accountability
(2010 economic policy drastically differed, 2015 cons belive in minimal state intervention, lab and lib want welfare state)
how does policy formulation hinder democracy?
-parties want to be more of a team that can win, less about ideas and ideologies
-often have similar policies if theres a race to the centre (2000s)
(all 3 want a free market, all 3 want continued investment in the nhs, johnson chosen for 2019 leadership campaign bc he was more charismatic)
how does recruiting leaders support democracy?
-parties control process for local candidates
-grow skills to work way up to leader
(2019 104 out of 202 lab mps were women - 1st major party)
How does recruiting leaders hinder democracy?
-parties may choose leaders who appease the public rather than competent
-party members may choose leader for personal gain
(truss’ tax policies meant members chose her as leader - undermines democracy)
how does organisation of government help democracy?
-gov formed by parties who win elections
-fptp - single party
-gov controls legislative agenda
-opposition parties can hold gov accountable
(1983, 1987, 1997, 2001 - over 100 seat majorities, johnson got 80 seat majority in 2019)
how does organisation of government hinder democracy?
-party unity declined in recent years
-parties with factions dont work together
-majority achieved in election can be questioned when party becomes divided
(new cons,erg, cconservative reform, pop cons )
how does participation help democracy?
-opportunities to become a member of a party boosts involvement in political process
-parties have an important role in raising political awareness + education
-party membership for smaller parties is on the rise (greens went from 30,000 in 2014 to 63,000 in 2015)
how does participation hinder democracy
partisan dealignment, only 9% asociated themselves strongly with a party in 2015, TO less predictable
-to is lower historically
-party membership fell for 3 major parties
-local parties have little control
how does representation help democracy?
-parties represent people who vote for them giving them a mandate
-parties historically represent certain group e.g labour party = workers
-parties try to appeal to majority of electorate
( sunak pushing thru rwanda bills, post office scandal - emergency legislation)
how does representation hinder democracy?
-as parties are catch all they lose the ability to represent specific groups
-pressure groups have increased (40-50% of the uk is part of a pressure group)
(middle class cons voters vote blair in 1997, 2001 to all voting groups decreased, 26% said theyd pay to be part of a campiagning or charity group in 2019, only 11% said theyd pay to be a member of a political party)
what rules fall under the electoral commission of PPERA 2002
-parties must submit public audits of all donations
-donations in excess of £7500 must be declared to the commission and info must be made available for scrutiny
-short money increased but in 2016 conservatives decreased it
-limited to 30,000 per constituency
what is short money?
-introduced in 1974 for HOC only, gives money to opposition parties depending on number of seats and number of votes in last GE
-short money is also available to any party which
-secured at least two seats OR secured one seat but received more than 150,000 votes
-atm parties get 20k for every seat and £40 for every 200 votes
-leader of opposition office is given 850k
how is money given to sinn fein bc of their abstentionism so they dont take a seat in parliament?
Representative money - for parties who choose not to take up their seats but still have a duty to their constituents
what is cranborne money?
1996- short money for the lords
why is short and cranborne money important?
essential for opp partys to be able to conduct scrutiny, research and legislation
what happened in the party funding scandal of bernie ecclestone and the labour party?
-january 1997, F1 chief ecclestone donates 1million to lab, lab cuts plans to stop tobacco funding for sports just for F1
what was the cash for honours funding scandal?
-2006/2007
-investigation into the fact that honours were being given out in return for donation, found that loans werent being publicised due to a loophole
-labour had ‘borrowed’ £14 million, cons £16 million and lib dem £850k
what was johnsons honours list scandal?
-peerages given to those who didnt deserve it e.g nadine dorries or matt hancock
-proved tory cronyism and peerages to donors and friends
what was the johnsons wall paper scandal?
-tories fined £17,800 for failing to declare spending £50k on redecorating bojos flat
-sparked scrutiny of gov spending
how much money did the conservative party gain in registered donations in 2019 campaign?
£19.4 million
how much money did the labour party gain in registered donations in 2019 campaign?
£5.4 million
how much money did the brexit party gain in registered donation in 2019 campaign?
£4.2 million
how does spf positively reduce party dependence on vested interests (wealthy donors)
-donating excess amounts to the small £6 conservative membership fee gives someone significant influence e.g lord sainsbury has donated over 10million to the conservatives since 2019
-spf makes parties more responsive to the needs of the electorate
how could spf negatively reinforce biases and a 2party system
-leader of opp receives sig more short money than other party leaders, as most likely 2 b lab or con = funding advantage
-legislation on spf most likely to come from lab/con in office who dont want it 2 b more democ
how could spf be done positively and democratically using election support
-using more elections than ge would b more fair 2 minor parties bc pr
-also could increase t.o as minor parties wld b able 2 campaign mor
how does spf negatively make parties complacent and weaken their links to society through a steady income
-blair reduced labour reliance on trade unions
-corbyn saw 450k increase to party membership
-party membership increases during leadership/ge, dont need spf bc people want a say
how could spf positively avoid controversy around donations 2 secure peerages
-include all funding scandals
-spf is necessary to boost legitimacy and trust etc.
how could spf negatively show a lack of public support
-distrust high since 2009 expenses scandal (in 2021 IPPR survey 63% said politicians were ‘out for themselves’)
-may lead to extremists getting seats
-violation of freedom of speech? donors shld b abl 2 donate £ protected?
devolved bodies are a ? party system
multi
in 2019 what % of seats were won by either labour or conservative?
87%
in every single GE since 1979 over ? % of votes were either lab or con?
65
theme A -uk is still a 2 party system - ge maintain 2 party system
2019 87% of vote either con or lab, 18/20, fptp
theme A - uk not 2 party system - class and partisan dealignment mean uk voters no longer identify w a particular party
lib dems - 1974 got 19% of vote but in 2015 lib dem got 8%
labs dominance in scotland ended by snp - since 2007 - snp largest party in scot parliament, since 2010 lab no longer biggest party in scotland
2010 - cameron (36% votes, 306 seats) and clegg (23% vote, 57 seats)
2017 - cons supply and demand deal with dup bc only 317 seats
theme B - uk 2 party system - media coverage mainly on 2 parties
2010 tv debates only with lib dem con and lab
-2017 media only on corbyn and may
theme B uk not 2 party system
rise of UKIP forced dc to put forward brexit
theme C uk is 2 party - ge most important election bc parl is sovereign
snp might be biggest in scot parl but can never win in parl and in 2019 only got 4% of vote
-parl is sovereign
theme C - uk not 2 party - multi party in devolved regions
2021 scot parl - coalition between snp and green 72/192 seats
senedd cymru 2021 - plaid cymru and lab
ni assembly 2022 - sinn fein - minor party so multi party
what are typical conservative ideologies
industries should be privatised, low tax, minimal state intervention - self reliance, upper class have a duty of paternalism (noblesse oblige), trad fam values, pragmatism (do what works w logic), free market capitalism, organic soc should be maintained - only change to conserve