Qualitative Flashcards
according to black scholarship what is socially relevant research (4 marks)
-Black adolescent development
- Role of traditional healers
- Applicability of theoretical models to African context/populations (cultural appropriateness)
- intersectional nature of oppression/identities and it’s impact on issues like housing, health, education
according to davison 2007 what is reflexivity in the research process
-Researchers’ biographic details often influence the methodological process
-Research is never separate from the researcher’s identity. Need to be aware that researcher subjectivity influences the collection of important insights
- “Researchers leak and seep their subjectivity continually and unavoidably; therefore, strengthens the research to work with the subjectivity and understand it rather than control it
according to malonswki what is the role of an ethnographer
immerse themselves in the ‘native’s’ world to grasp the ‘native’s point of view’, relation to life, realise their vision of world
according to parker 2005 what is power in the research enterprise
-Who dominates research institutions, and who is producing the knowledge?
-Higher educational institutions have historically been dominated by white men
- Universities are (traditionally) middle-class, white spaces There’s still an underrepresentation of working-class people in academia
- There are issues of class, race and gender
According to Seidman 1991 what are good interview skills
- listen more talk less
- follow up on what the participant says
- ask questions when you don’t understand
- ask to hear more about the subject
- explore, don’t probe
- ask open ended questions
- follow up, don not interrrupt
- keep participants focused
- do not reinforced participant’s response
- tolerate silence
explain 1st wave feminism
-feminist empiricism
-incuded liberal feminism and marxist feminism
-Women’s suffrage; property rights
-Position of similarities:
+ Similarities between and within gender
+Reject idea of gender differences
+ Add women to research, not a critique of science itself
explain 2nd wave feminism
-feminists standpoint
-1960s-1970s
included radical feminsim
-Overthrowing the patriarchy; gender as a public and political issue\
- Focused on how women’s experiences are different from men.
-Essentialist and separatist
-Giving voice to women
explain 3rd wave feminism
-1990s+
- Included black/poststructualist feminism
- Critical of research itself: scientific research isn’t neutral, it reflects hegemonic values
- Identities, realities are fluid and always changing
- Examine taken-for-granted realities
Explain a semantic level in an a thematic analysis and say what paradigm is falls into
Semantic = relating to meaning in a language or logic.
Therefore semantic analysis does not look beyond what the participant says.
Describe and summarize what the participants say and discuss implications
Focus on individuals
Falls under interpretive paradigm
Explain a thematic Deductive analysis (5 bullet points)
- Deductive = top down
- applies existing theoretical frameworks
- more explicitly analysis-driven
- uses ready made categories and looks for instances that fit those categories
- rather than a rich description, it provides a detailed analysis of some aspect of the data
Explain a thematic inductive analysis
- Themes are found within the data, the process is “data driven” (but, the researcher can never fully free themselves from pre-conceived ideas)
- looks at data and works out what the ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES the naturally underlie the material are
- Is data driven as there is little or no reliance on pre-exiting codes/theories (codes the data w/out trying to fit it into a preexisting framework
- more popular in qualitative research
Explain what determines whether you run an INDUCTIVE or DEDUCTIVE/THEORETICAL analysis
Partly determined by how and why you are coding the data. If you are coding for a specific research question (works with deductive), but if the research question can evolve through the coding process, this suits the inductive approach
explain Collins’ 1990s matrix of domination
all identities based on social group membership interact with each other to create life situations that are qualitatively different depending on one’s location in the matrix.
* “intersecting identities create instances of both opportunity and oppression, where a person can, depending on his or her particular identity in a particular social context, experience advantage, disadvantage, or both at the same time” (Baca Zinn & Thornton Dill, 1996).
* Each matrix = various oppressions which are all interlinking
explain disciplinary identities within the matrix of domination
Exists to manage oppression: Bureaucratic organisations; institutions whose task is to control and organize human behavior through routinization, rationalization and surveillance
* Racism, sexism & other oppressions hidden behind “efficiency, rationality, equal treatment”
* Collins’ example: University system
-change thru insider resistance
explain interpersonal identities within matrix of domination
ur personal relationships & daily interactions. Influences everyday life * “How am I upholding the oppression of another?” ; “How am I upholding my own oppression?”
* Example: xenophobia, heterosexual women who discriminate against LGBT persons
explain structural identities within matrix of domination
Identities uphelad by law, religion, political system, economy etc
- For example: apartheid government system and the right to vote
- These are slow to change, need wars, revolutions etc
Explain the interviewers’ monopoly of interpretation
- Interview generally holds a “monopoly of interpretation” over the interviewee’s statements
- Seen as “big interpreter” who holds exclusive rights it interpret and report what the interviewee really means
- Interviewers attempt to reduce dominance by giving the interpretations back to participants (but participants may not have the competence to address or adequately engage theoretical interpretations
Explain the notion of asymmetrical power distribution within the interview space
- Interviews are presented a open and dominance-free dialogue, but this is a “masking of power”
- Interviews are specific hierarchical and instrumental forms of conversation where interviewer sets the stage and scripts in accordance with his or her interests
- creating trust through a personal relationships serves as a means to obtain access to the interviewee’s world
- the interview takes place for the purpose of the interviewer alone, it is not a dialogue
- one part seeks understanding and the other part serves only as a means for interviewers knowledge interest
- the interviewer generally holds a monopoly of interpretation over the interviewee’s statements, which may be in conflict with the true interpretation of the statements
- qual research interviews are instrumental and unequal conversations - we need to acknowledge this power dynamic
explain the notion of the strange and the familiar (within ethnographic research)
- Purpose of ethnographic research is often to “make the strange familiar” and “render the familiar strange” (Goodley, 20002, p. 4)
- Making that which is unknown, known
- And showing that phenomena often overlooked and regarded as trivial can be more nuanced and complex that imagined
“By turning the gaze back to familiar cultures, the opportunity is open to think again about practices within those cultures and to challenge taken-for-granted assumptions about social groups and/or contexts” (Runswick-Cole, 2011, p. 77)
-“render the familiar strange” - Show that these cultures may be more complex than imagined or different to our preconceived ideas.
explain the phase of defining a research question in developing a PAR study
The kinds of questions we ask about an issue will determine the kinds of answers we find (the way in which a problem is defined will shape or constrain the results of an enquiry) By concentrating on the technical aspects of the research design, and de-emphasising the manner in which the research questions arise in the first place, traditional researchers disguise the political nature of the enquiry. As a consequence, many questions in the social sciences are constructed in such a way that they blame the victim
E.g. Domestic Violence – “Personality Traits”
Rape – “Risk factors”
Teenaged pregnancy – “Risky behaviour”
These questions BLAME the victim PAR attempts to overcome these problems by involving participants (including less powerful groups) in the process of framing the research questions
The questions are therefore often framed from the participants’ position
The idea is that the most directly affected are also must likely to be able to provide solutions to their own problems
Explain the process of transcribing
- a 60 min interview may take 6+ hours to transcribe
- transcribe into word processor
- transcribe everything (silences, pauses, fillers etc) - make analytical notes about interpretation
- re-listen and follow in the transcribe text to edit
- often return the transcriptions to interviewees to confirm accuracy and or transcription and interpretation
Explain transcription in a thematic analysis specifically
- the richness and quality or the data depends largely on the quality of the transcribing process
- transcribe VERBATIM
- transcribe more than words (laughs, pauses etc)
explain what hegemonic identities are within matrix of domination
Hegemoni identities are those that legitimize oppression
* Links the structural, disciplinary and interpersonal domains
* Identities created/upheld by the language we use, images, values & ideas
* Produced through school curricula and textbooks, religious teachings, mass media images, community cultures, and family histories
* Change through critique & self-re-education
how can research maintain and reproduce class/gender and racial stereotypes?
-Research on stigmatized issues (HIV/Aids, Intimate Partner violence, street-based sex work): Usually conducted using samples drawn from disadvantaged and marginalised populations.
-Financial compensation may be incentive
- Wealthier populations are more difficult to access (private service providers).
-The invisibility of privileged groups and the over-representation of the poor and marginalised in research means that social problems such as HIV and violence is being represented as a problem of the poor and disadvantaged.
how do feminist researchers achieve reflexivity?
Feminist social scientists insist upon recognizing the shared human attributes of the researcher and subject
- Therefore self-conscious of the role their identification or disidentification with the subjects might play in the research process
- Aware that their demographic and personal characteristics play some part in eliciting research data
- Sometimes choose to write using the first person
how do stages of life influence the narrative interview
Later life = “narrative phase par excellence” (Freeman, 1997)
One has gained certain distance from the life one has lived and are able to draw connections over time
how do we see our participants in PAR?
The participants don’t remain merely objects of study, but partners in the research process
quantiative =>subject
qualitative => participant
PAR => co-researcher
How do you avoid leading questions in interviews?
Don’t make assumptions about your participants and their experiences, allow the stories to come from them
EG: don’t say “how has been black negatively affected your experience at UCT”, rather “what does being a black student at UCT mean?”
How do you end an interview?
- ask participants if they’d like to add anything, make possible arrangements for a follow up
- store recording in safe place
- write PROCESS notes - notes on what happened in the interview that may not be apparent in recording (your own feelings/thoughts etc)
- transcribe the interview
how does the PAR contribute to the ideal of power?
The ultimate goal of a collaborative relationship is structural transformation and the improvement of the lives of those involved.
The outcome of a successful PAR project is not merely a better understanding of a problem or a successful action to eliminate the problem, but rather…
- a raised awareness in people of their own abilities and resources to mobilize for action. This is known as empowerment
how is data collected in the FDA tradition (Foucauldian Discourse Analysis)
Anything is text – analysis can be carried out on any symbolic system, wherever there’s meaning Fashion, poems, photography etc
how is data collected within the Discursive psychology tradition?
Unsolicited, naturally occurring conversation
* Requires familiar setting – ethical and practical difficulties regarding recording unsolicited conversations of strangers often result in DP conducting semi-structured interviews
* But participants invariably change their behaviour when being interviewed
OR
Group conversations, e.g. friends. More naturally occurring, relaxed, spontaneous (but could lead to reappraisals of one another)
how is intersectionality a critique of feminism
Emerged out of second-wave black feminist critique in early 1970s in the US
Most feminist scholarship focused on concerns and interests of white, middle-class women
Not naming whiteness and middle-class-ness – naturalizing and generalizing the concerns of white feminists to black women and feminists
* “Intersectionality is a metaphor for understanding the ways that multiple forms of inequality or disadvantage sometimes compound themselves and create obstacles that often are not understood within conventional ways of thinking.”
analytical framework - views people through the interaction of their social identities (including gender, race, sexual orientation, class, religion, ability etc.) resulting in a unique lived social experience of oppression and privilege
how is the research context created?
The research context is created when everything that is going on in the mind of the interviewer interacts with everything that is going on inside of the mind of the participant, at that specific place in time.
How is transcripition done within DP tradition
Detailed and time-consuming process [+- 6 hrs for 30 min interview and 10 hrs for 1hr interview]
* Because DA focuses on what discourse does, it’s important to pay attention to the way things are said, not only what is being said
* Should contain at least some non-linguistic features [emotions, fillers, delay, hesitation, emphasis
How is transcription and coding done within FDA tradition?
Transcription is less detailed than DP
* Similar to DP, coding is an iterative process – the researcher moves between coding and analysis (there’s flexibility in the coding process)
* Identify key themes/discursive constructions, marking any section in which one of the themes is discussed
how is writing up done within FDA tradition?
Interlinked with analysis
* Often in DA report results and discussion together
Remember to contextualise findings link to literature and research questions
How are research questions presented in FDA tradition?
- Questions that aim to explore the understandings we use to explain our world
- How these understandings give rights/ place expectations upon people
- and the social and historical context that allow these understandings to make sense to the speaker
- How discourses construct subject positions and re-produce power relations
- What are the subject positions available in contemporary friendship discourse?
- Subject positions = relatively coherent understanding of an aspect of the self. Associated with particular rights and responsibilities in terms of what we can do and say. (e.g. ‘student’ allows once access to the library, but not to the librarian’s desk).
- positions within networks of meaning that speakers can take up (as well as place others within)
how would one describe the depth of engagement in feminist research?
-Feminist researchers invest considerable effort in obtaining the trust of informants as they’re interested in hidden or what are conventionally considered personal or private aspects of people’s lives
- Greater intimacy is therefore usually established between the researcher and participant(s
how would u describe intersectionality in research
Intersectionality draws on the idea of the interconnectedness of multiple identities and experiences
shows how these identities and experiences relate to power and social-structural oppressions
Intersectionality is used as a feminist tool for social critique and activism All oppression is connected
If interviews are social encounters what constitutes data?
- how participants present themselves
- the emotions they convey
- the relationships they establish in the research encounter (eg male interviewee talking over female interviewer
- importance of reflexivity
If participants are not passive but actively practicing agency, what may they decide to do
they may decide to:
- not answer or to deflect a Q
- talk about something unrelated to the Q
- tell the interviewer what they believe they want to hear
- start to question interviewer
- withdraw from the interview
In a thematic analysis what constitutes a theme?
- A theme captures something NB about the data in relation to the research Q
- it represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set
- no hard and fast rule about how prevalent something has to be within your data set before it counts as a theme - rather whether it captures something important in relation to the overall RQ
in ethnographies -what are the difficulties in defining space and time
- Traditional - physical location, study inhabitants of that space.
- With Virtual ethrnographies - object of study influenced by connectivity or interaction
Difficulties defining space: - User situated within a physical context that can and will influence their online behaviour
- A researcher may find it beneficial to study their subject’s offline lives as well as their online (although the focus should be on their online behaviour)
- Can be seen as a “cyberspace”, as a place where the mind rather than the body navigates.
Difficulties defining time:
* Temporality of message boards (not exactly here-and-now communication)
* Researchers can access many chat after they’ve occured
* Ethnographer and participants don’t need to share the same time frame
* Ethnographer will not experience the threads in the same order and at the same time as any of the other users
* Users can be in more than one “location” at any given time
in virtual ethnographies, what is the relationship between identity play and authenticity?
Lack of face-to-face contact allows the informants to adopt a false identity
* Identity easier to play with on the internet – internet does not create phenomena – merely another venue for it to occur
* Are people being authentic? Does it matter? Tend to focus on digitally projected identities and how these identities are negotiated
* Just because the virtual world is not the “real world” does not mean social behaviour changes entirely between the two.
in narrative, interviews what is the role of an interviewer?
Interviewer: More passive, good listener, follows up with questions
* Empathetic and supportive; get to know research participant
* Make the participant feel that you value their stories
in research whose voices are heard and which voices are silenced?
-Psychological research is historically male-centric and hetero-centric
-Earlier feminist scholarly work was written by white, privileged women about the issues of white privileged women (still largely the case)
-The experiences and struggles of women of colour fell between the cracks of both feminist and antiracist discourse (Crenshaw 1989)
in terms of feminism research what is participatory action orientation?
-Aims to convey and transfer research skills to participants during the research’s execution
- Participants are given feedback about the implications of the data
- Participants are encouraged to join in dialogue around the findings
in terms of marxist research, what is oppression?
Combination of prejudice and institutional power which creates a system that discriminates against target groups and benefits other dominant groups
Two sides of the same coin: the flip side of oppression is privilege (often invisible advantages that come with being part of a dominant societal group)
in terms of marxist research what is privilege?
Operates on personal, interpersonal, cultural, and institutional levels Gives advantages, favours, and benefits to members of dominant groups at the expense of members of target groups
In terms of ontology, epistemology and methodology what is the difference between positivism, intepretisvim and constructionism?
ONTOLOGY:
- positivist: external reality = stable and law like
- interpretive: internal reality = a subjective experience
- Constructivist: reality = socially constructed, discourse and power
EPISTEMOLOGY:
- positivist: objective observer = detached
- interpretive: observer = subjective
- Constructivist: suspicious political observer = constructing reality
METHODOLOGY:
- positivist: experiements, quantitative, hypothesis testing
- interpretive: interpretation, interactional, qualitative
- Constructivist: deconstruction, textual analysis, discourse analysis
in what forums are Feminist researchers interested in disseminating their findings?
popular as well as academic forums
intersectionality is opposed to what model of oppression?
Opposed to an additive model of oppression that views people as the sum of their social identities
name 4 data collection methods
- interviews
- focus groups
- participant observation
- documentary sources
name 3 situations where qualitative research is useful
-Useful in situations where the variables are unknown, or it’s unknown which are important or how to measure them
- Need an open-ended, inductive exploration made possible by qualitative research
- Can be used to identify potentially important variables and generate hypotheses
* Understanding in context (empathy) is an important principle
name 6 types of data collection approaches
narrative enquiry, grounded theory, phenomenology, case studies, ethnography
name the 3 feminist waves
1st wave: Feminist Empiricism (late 1800s and early 1900s)
2nd Wave: Feminists standpoint (1960s and1970s)
3rd Wave: Feminist Relativism – Postmodern (1990s-)
name the give the focus of the 4 types of feminism
- Liberal: Equal rights and opportunities
- Marxist / Socialist: Gender and the capitalist system
- Radical: The patriarchy
- Poststructuralist: deconstructs ideas of gender; language
Black / African feminism: Experiences of black women
photovoice theory is a subsection of what paradigms?
Critical consciousness
Feminist theory
Documentary photography
What are axes of identity
The axes, include race, religion, sexual orientation, age, culture, disability status, education level etc
What are common interview errors (6 marks)
- asking too many questions
- asking closed questions
- asking leading questions that pressurize the interviewee to answer in a specific way
- asking excessively probing Qs
- asking poorly times questions
- asking “why?” questions
What are critical approaches to interviews?
Publicized interviews and confessions have become common place as society consumes drama and gossip. Qual interviews seek to negate this and control consumption and sensationalization
what are ethical considerations when it comes to virtual ethnography
As in traditional ethnography, the researcher must strive to protect participants / informants from physical, psychological and legal harm Virtual ethnography, particularly focus:
* Problems of anonymity
o Use of pseudonyms – usernames traced/linked back to users
o Prevent direct quotations
o Researcher needs to do whatever they can to protect anonymity
* Informed consent and age
o Children should be excluded from the research without legal approval
what are examples of macro and micro research contexts
macro: post aparatheid
micro: uct undergrad residence
What are focus groups?
- General term for a research interview conducted within a group.
- typically a group of people who share a similar type of experience
- allows one to access experiences shared by a community of people
- useful to provide participants with a stimulus to respond to as a way of initiating discussion
- exploration of a variety of views, complex and contradictory ideas
What are good things to remember when setting up an interview? (3 marks)
- ensure an adequate degree of privacy
- find a quiet location (for recording)
- obtain consent to record and be weary of affects of recording (peformance by interviewee etc)
What are guidelines that make a good qualitative interview?
- be friendly
- treat participants with respect and gratitude
- treat participants as experts on the topic
- participants as co-inquirers
- listen intently, encourage them to elaborate
what are narrative interviews?
Primary means for collecting narratives = interviews (usually unstructured)
o Broad, open-ended questions, that invite stories
* Participant = active agent, determines the pace and direction of interview. Allowed to identify the major themes.
* Participants have greater control in shaping agenda
* Different to the standard interview where researcher brings questions or broad themes to explore
what are other considerations when it comes to virtual ethnographies and identity?
‘Lurkers’ - View an online community covertly, without active participation
* Depends on ethnographic focus – if the lurker only reads and never posts then they do not contribute to the community and can be ignored
* Avatars, user names etc can tell one a lot about persons demographic and personal aspects, e.g. interests, identity, profession
o How does this affect the anonymity of participants?
what are other ethnographic methods?(3)
Interviews
Focus groups (Interview group of people at the same time)
Multimedia approaches
what are paradigms?
= all-encompassing systems of interrelated practice and thinking that define for researchers the nature of their enquiry. Positivism, interpretivism, constructivism (each has different philosophical assumptions)
What are social structural oppressions?
When a single group unjustly takes advantage of and excises power over another group using dominance/subordination
what are some issues facing ethnographers?
Ethnics, gaining access, and gatekeepers
- Tendency to produce colonising discourse – ‘Other’ interpreted through values of researcher
- Informed consent, deception, privacy, confidentiality
- Identity of the researcher impacts access to research context o Insiders must be aware of a possible abuse of power within pre-existing relationships
o Outsiders: building familiarity and trust may take longer – role of gatekeepers - Note that gatekeepers are a first point of access but it’s important to negotiate access with all people participating in research
o E.g. Research with children - Got consent from parents / guardians, but ‘assent’ from children = on-going process – continuously check if happy to continue participation
- Ethnographic researchers don’t attempt to write themselves out of the analysis. They instead offer a reflexive account of their role within it
what are some key PAR words?
Collaboration
Social Change
Empowerment – the core
Action
Participation
Transformation
what are some pitfalls to avoid in thematic analysis?
- Failure to actually analyse the data at all: No or very little effort to identify themes across the entire data set, or make sense of themes
- Using the interview schedule as the “themes” indicates no analytic work has been done
- Weak or unconvincing analysis, where themes do not work, where there is too much overlap between themes, or where the themes are not internally coherent and consistent; fail to provide adequate examples from the data
- Mismatch between the data and the analytic claims that are made (unfounded analysis)
- Leaving out crucial information: Failing to spell out TA’s theoretical assumptions or clarify how it was undertaken and for what purpose
what are some questions researchers may ask in narrative analysis?
How did the way I phrased questions facilitate the telling of certain stories and inhibit others?
* How did my own intersecting identities (age, race, class, gender, sexuality, level of education, religion) influence how I perceived the topic of study, the participant’s responses, and how I perceived the participant themselves?
* How did my intersecting identities affect how the participants perceived me?
* How did my intersecting identities affect the kinds of narratives participants chose to tell me?