Quality Control and accepting engagements Flashcards

1
Q

Importance for a audit to be of a good quality

A

Protects the reputation of the firm and of the profession
Provides defence in the event of being sued for negligence
In the public interest as well as that of specific users

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Internal systems to identify quality failures

A

ISQM 1 raises areas of quality for firms to consider at a firm level
ISA 220 requires auditors to implement performance related quality measures on individual audits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

External systems to identify quality failures

A

Listed company audit files reviewed by the Audit Inspection Unit part of the FRC Executive Committee
Regulatory reviews of non-listed audits reviewed by the ICAEW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A firm is required to implement a system on quality management (QMS) that gives the firm reasonable assurance that…

A

The firm and its personnel fulfil professional, legal and regulatory requirements
Engagement Reports issued are appropriate
CEO / managing partner responsible for QMS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Elements addressed by QMS

A

Risk assessment
Governance and leadership
Ethical requirements
Continuance and acceptance
Engagement performance
Resources
Information and communication
Monitoring and remediation process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Engagement partner responsibilities

A

Managing and achieving quality on an audit engagement
Knowing the relevant ethical requirements and ensuring that they are fulfilled
Evaluating threats and taking appropriate actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Purpose of staff work being reviewed by senior staff is to consider whether…

A

The work has been performed in accordance with professional standards
Significant matter have been raised
Appropriate consultations have taken place
Objectives of the engagement have been achieved
The work performed supports the conclusions reached
The evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate
There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of the work performed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hot file reviews

A

Provides an objective evaluation of the significant judgements made and conclusions reached in formulating an auditor’s report
Involves reviews and evaluations
Mandatory for audits of listed / high risk entities
Performed on or before the date of the auditor’s report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cold file reviews

A

Provides reasonable assurance that its QMS is operating effectively
Conducted by a Quality Partner
Performed on a sample of audit files
Considers compliance
Mandatory requirement of ISQM 1
Performed after the date of the auditor’s report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Documentation

A

Should contain what would be necessary to provide an experiences auditor, with no previous connection to the audit, with an understanding of the nature / timing / extent / result of audit procedures, the audit evidence obtained and the conclusions reached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consultation

A

Obtained by the engagement partner for technical, difficult or contentious issues to ensure good quality judgements are made
Audit engagement partner responsible for
- following the firm’s procedures to resolve differing opinions before signing the auditor’s report
- addressing issues arising from the monitoring and remediation process as they apply to the audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

UK Corporate Governance Code

A

Requires the Audit Committee to scrutinise the quality of the external audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Audit committee responsibilities

A

Recommending the appointment / reappointment / removal
Approving fees
Agreeing on the terms of engagement
Putting the audit out to tender every 10 years
Annually assessing the independence, objectivity and effectiveness of the external audit process - report to shareholders once done so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Audit Committee planning considerations

A

Audit strategy and plan
Materiality
Resources and expertise of the audit team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Audit Committee review during the audit

A

Findings and discuss major issues encountered
Key accounting and audit judgements
Errors identified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Audit Committee assessment on completion

A

Review
- whether the auditor has met the agreed audit plan
- the content of the external auditor’s management letter
Consider
- the scepticism of the auditors in their handling of the key accounting and audit judgements identified
- the cost effectiveness and value for money of the audit

17
Q

How might an assurance firm obtain an engagement?

A

Being approached by a potential / existing client and being asked to accept / tender for the engagement

18
Q

Factors considered by a client when evaluating the tender

A

Quality of service prospective auditors are likely to provide
Knowledge of the business they possess
Experience of the industry they have
Proposed personnel on the audit team
References obtained about the audit firm

19
Q

Lowballing

A

Charging less than the market rate for the audit
Not unethical but ethical safeguards should be considered - increases self-interest threat

20
Q

Fees should be determined with reference to the…

A

Seniority / experience / time of employees engaged on the work
Degree of risk and responsibility the work entails
Nature / complexity of the client’s business
Priority and importance of the work to the client
Expenses properly incurred

21
Q

Code of Ethics suggests basis for fee computation should…

A

Be disclosed and discussed with the client as soon as possible
- incorporated into tendering document

22
Q

Assurance risk analysis considers whether the company has…

A

Directors / management with integrity
A good financial record
Good internal control
Unusual transactions or a complex structure

23
Q

Auditor considerations when deciding whether to accept an assurance engagement

A

Results of risk analysis
Any ethical issues which prevent acceptance
Whether the firm has sufficient experience and resources to undertake the engagement
If all the legal requirements associated with the appointment of the incoming auditors and removal / resignation of outgoing auditors have been met

24
Q

Ethical issues steps

A

Prospective auditor receives written authority from the client to communicate with the existing auditor
- writes to existing auditor, seeking information which could influence the decision to accept the audit
Existing auditor receives written authority from the client to respond to the prospective auditor
- Informs prospective auditor of any unlawful acts by the client / unpaid fees / differences of opinion with the client

25
Q

Appointment of auditors by the members

A

Auditor appointed by ordinary resolution
Members (shareholders) appoint the auditor at a general meeting at which the financial statements are put forward for approval by members
Appointment made within 28 days after the last date on which the account must be filed - in not, existing auditor deemed reappointed

26
Q

Removed auditors

A

Must write a statement of circumstances and deposit it at the company’s registered office explaining circumstances of removal
Have the right to
- receive notice, attend and speak at the meeting appointing the new auditor
- have written representations circulated to all the members

27
Q

Resigned auditors

A

Must submit written notice to the company’s registered office and submit a statement of circumstances explaining the circumstances of their resignation
Has the right to
- request that the directors convene a general meeting, allowing auditors to explain the circumstances
- require the directors circulate the statement of circumstances before the meeting

28
Q

Pre-conditions of an audit

A

Establish whether the financial reporting framework to be applied is acceptable
Ensure that management understands its responsibilities to
- prepare financial statements
- maintain a system of internal control
- provide information and access to auditors

29
Q

The Letter of Engagement (ISA 210) covers…

A

The objective and scope of the audit of financial statements
Management’s responsibilities
The auditor’s responsibilities
The form and content of reports and communications
The unavoidable risk of material misstatement due to limitations of an audit
The fact that auditors are entitled to unrestricted access to records and documents connected to the audit
The expectation that management will provide written representations

30
Q

Recurring audits

A

Auditors should consider every year whether a new Letter of Engagement

31
Q
A
32
Q

Changes indicating a new Letter of Engagement is required

A

Terms of engagement
Senior management
Directors
Ownership
Financial reporting framework
Legal or regulatory requirements