Quiz 2 Flashcards

1
Q

How does our unconscious transform from the physical to the psychological

A

Relate the exaptation (re-use) of pre-existing innate concepts and structures from early learning concerning the physical world from evolved motives like survival and reproduction to metaphorically related physical concepts which activate the psychological concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bargh & Morsella 2008: did conscious replace unconscious

A

Conscious capacities did not replace unconscious mechanisms

Analogy- nuclear power plants still use transistors and cathode ray tube displays because they can’t be taken off-line to replace old technology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Daniel Dennett 1991: our use of analogies

A

We often use analogies for behaviour, for example: warmth searching = security seeking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rozin 1976; Reber 1991: conscious depends on unconscious

A

Unconscious mechanisms furnish inputs into conscious choice and decision processes — the later evolving conscious circuits start with, and depend on, the unconscious mechanisms, so the later are ‘locked in’ the mind forever.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Gollwitzer et al. 2020: broken patterns

A

Dislike of broken patterns (non-social deviancy) predicts greater moral condemnation and punishment of harm and purity violations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Gollwitzer 2017: Why do we dislike deviance? And how it’s related to prejudice

A

Children and adults dislike of broken patterns is correlated with measures of racism and prejudice. “Types” of people and types of behaviour that ‘break the pattern’ are different from what most people are like or do, can be disliked merely because they are different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hills, Gladstone et al: Forging through the mind

A

Participants that played a game where they searched for treasure, food, gold, etc were faster and more productive in searching their memories for examples of types of events or remembering various features of their past. Searching one’s mind for memories is akin to foraging for food, it’s that physical physiological relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

McDonald, Webster, Stillman, Tice and Baumeister: Does Tylenol cure breakups

A

Tylenol reduced the amount of physical pain but also the amount of emotional pain that the individual was feeling because our mind conflates emotional pain with physical pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Esienberger, Lieberman, Williams: does rejection hurt

A

Same region of the brain lit up when feeling emotional pain as it does when feeling physical pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Michael Anderson: Neural Re-use

A

Distributed representations and circuits that can be applied to analogous, more abstract contexts and situations. Our brain uses similar structures for different contexts that are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gilbert et al. 2005; Xu et al 2015: hunger and shopping

A

Hunger makes you buy more both at the supermarket (Gilbert), but also at Walmart and Target (Xu). Self reported hunger is correlated with the amount of money spent on the shoppers’ receipts. Hungry people also take more free stuff if it is available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Huang, Sedlovskaya, Ackerman, & Bargh: Disease avoidance and political attitudes

A

Vaccination against a virus reduces negative attitudes towards immigrants

Using disinfectant after being reminded of the dangers of the flu virus reduces negative attitudes towards immigration

Concern for physical safety underlies concern for social/cultural safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Zhong & Liljenquist: physical and moral cleansing

A

Study 1: Participants who imagine themselves committing moral transgressions were more likely to chose hand wipes as a gift rather than something else

Study 2: hand copied stories of moral transgressions then rated several products — rated cleaning products higher

Study 3: willingness to help a desperate grad student was very dependent on whether or not the participant washed their hands after remembering a time where the did something morally wrong. Participants who cleaned there hands were less likely to help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lee Schwarz 2019: cleansing of states

A

Washing hands also washes away temporary states, such as luck, or short term memory. Thats why hockey players don’t shave during the playoffs or athletes don’t wash their gear. Cleansing is a separation between two properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Chapman et al. 2009: EMG muscle responses to stimuli

A

Same EMG muscle responses to physically disgusting stimuli and morally disgusting behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Schnall et al 2008: moral judgments in dirty or clean rooms

A

Moral judgments are more negative and severe when made in clean rooms vs dirty rooms or after exposure to unclean vs clean objects. Highlights the relationship between disgust and moral condemnation (Haidt), and cleanliness and moral purity or goodness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

John Bowlby: Attachment and Loss

A

Physical warmth is naturally conflated with social warmth in early experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Williams & Bargh 2008: physical warmth creates social warmth

A

Example: Drinking a hot beverage gives the feeling of physical warmth which is conflated with social warmth and unconsciously alters our behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Solomon Asch: warm and cold as central traits

A

Warm or cold descriptors used as traits of individual’s personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Fiske, Glick, Xu, Cuddy: warm and cold as traits

A

Traits perceived as either warm or cold dictate universal dimensions of outgroup stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Williams and Bargh: temperature priming and personality impressions

A

Replaced the words warm or cold with physical sensations of warm or cold given the same character traits otherwise, people tended to view a person more positively after feeling warm objects vs cold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Ijzerman et al. 2012: warmth priming of daycare aged children

A

Daycare children primed with warmth shared more if their stickers with other children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Kang, Williams, Clark, Bargh: social neuroscience research: the role of insula

A

Left anterior insula becomes more activated following cold versus warm temperature sensation , and also becomes more activated following betrayals of trust in the economics game.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Zhong & Leonardelli 2008: warmth after rejection

A

Greater preference for warm food such as soup for lunch compared to cold food after a rejection experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Ijzerman & Semin: Room temperature estimation

A

People estimate room temperature to be colder after rejection experience, and warmer after inclusion experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ijzerman et al. 2012: room temperature and rejection (skin temperature change)

A

Skin temperature decreased by 1/2 a degree after an exclusion event and increased 1/2 a degree after inclusion evenly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Cacioppon 1984: social isolation effect on body

A

Social isolation and loneliness cause vascular constriction. That’s why you feel colder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Ingaki & Eisenberger: shared neural mechanisms underlying social warmth and physical warmth

A

Reading socially warm and neutral messages from friends and family and holding physically warm and neutral temperature objects yielded the same results on in fMRI. Significant correlation between body temperature and feeling close to others at the same time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Fetterman et al 2017: daily diary study

A

Reports of feeling warm or cold during the day are related to how many positive pro-social or negative antisocial behaviours the person preformed that day.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

The scaffolding model

A

Evolved goals for survival and physical safety serve as the basis of goals that develop later in the individuals life for psychological and social safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Jean Mandler: language acquisition

A

Early spatial and physical concepts are the scaffold on which language acquisition is based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Early development scaffolding core concepts

A

We develop psychological concepts based on physical analogies to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Jean Mendler: psychological concepts based on physical analogies

A

Infants can analyze and compare externally available information — formation of spatial concepts (left, right, up, down) with no access to internal states. Later those internal states are understood using available physical concepts in analogically fashion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What are the earliest concepts formed by an infant?

A

Spatial and other directly experienced physical concepts. These concepts provide the foundational structure for subsequent abstract concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Spatial concepts: Distance

A

Various forms of distance are swappable. Meaning physical distance can be conflated with social distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Schubert 2005: your highness

A

Power and verticality share the same metaphor

Ex: looking up to someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Nelson & Simmons 2007: spatial/verticality effects

A

People are more likely to travel south to buy a sale item than to travel north. Idea of conflation of physical distance and social distance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Ackerman, Nocera, & Bargh: haptic (touch) priming and metaphors

A

Metaphorical effects of physical touch on social judgement
Heavy = serious
Hard = ridged, difficult
Rough = effortful
Smooth = fluent, easy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Haptic priming : hard vs soft

A

Hard chair = less compromise in negotiations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Michael Schafer et al 2018: soft on crime

A

Feeling something hard vs soft activates somatosensory cortex. People were more lenient when judging crimes and how much punishment should be given after feeling something soft than something hard. Activation of somatosensory cortex is correlated with harshness of sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Haptic priming: rough vs smooth

A

Ratings of integration between supervisor and employee were rated as easier and more fluent if the participants felt something smooth, and more difficult if they felt something rough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Schaefer, Heinz, & Rotte: replicated studies of social priming

A

Replicated Ackerman et al. With rough and smooth physical primes. Rough primes caused judgements that interaction was less smooth and coordinated. There was a significant correlation between primary somatosensory cortex activation and rough judgements of interaction coordination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Meier, Robinson et al: physical and social sweetness

A

Eating sweet foods is related to prosocial behaviours such as helpfulness, smiling and pleasantness. We also believe that people who like sweet foods are more agreeable and have more prosocial personalities, intentions and behaviour.

Tasting something sweet increased self reports of helpfulness and agreeableness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Stepper & Strack: Postural feedback

A

Slouching or upright posture during tests; sloucher’s feel less proud upon learning they’d succeeded in a test. Effect directed from body to emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Chen & Bargh: evaluation and muscular readiness

A

Positive evaluation produces approach muscular tendency, negative evaluation produces avoidance muscular tendency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Tom et al: Head shaking and evaluation

A

People liked the pen they were using more when they happened to be shaking head up and down compared to when they were shaking their head from left to right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Strack et al: reverse engineering the emotion-expression connection

A

Holding pen between teeth or lips (simulating a smile or frown) affected the participants judgement on how funny a cartoon was

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Lakoff & Johnson: metaphorical thought

A

We think and communicate easily in terms of analogies. Abstract terms are metaphorically related to basic physical terms: hot-head, close relationship etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Barsalou: embodied cognition

A

The physical direction which you looked affected how many birds (looking up) you could name or flowers (looking down) you could name in an unfurnished room.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Akpinar & Berger: analogies with physical experience

A

Phrases and concepts that contain physical experiences are much more likely to catch on in popular usage than other forms of description

Ex: Hot topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Embodied cognition

A

Memory encodes bodily states associated with experiences, including psychological states associated with emotional experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Innate

A

Hard-wired connections have developed over evolutionary time between physical states and common concepts and motives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Early learning

A

Scaffolding of more abstract, higher order concepts onto early formed original concepts based on physical experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Shared reality/ social communication with analogies

A

We all share the same physical experiences and easily talk to one another, and understand one another, when we make analogies to those physical experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Early-developed guides to adaptive behaviour

A

Genetic: genetic motives such as survival, reproduction, food etc
Epigenetic: very early life experiences (with care takers)
Cultural: behaviour influenced by cultural norms and current environment
Learning: even more fine-tuned guides, given local circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Jeff Simpson and colleagues: early attachment

A

Attachment at age 1 predicts:
Social abilities in grade school
Number of friends in high school
How long their relationships last in their 20’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Mischell: the marshmallow test

A

Measured how long the child could wait and eat the marshmallow or pretzel stick. Kids that could wait at age 4, had better grades in high school, had lower chances of teen pregnancy, and drug abuse, lower arrest rates, and greater income at 30, and lower divorce rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Block & Block: physical safety motivations and political attitudes

A

Fearful 4 year old children were more likely to report conservative attitudes at age 23

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Dunham et al. 2008: stereotypes and inter group biases

A

There exist tendencies at birth to favour one’s in group and stereotype out groups — also children soak up cultural views about social values at early ages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

IAT: implicit association test

A

Measures the associative strength between pairs of concepts such as social categories and attributes. Measures implicit biases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

Gilbert 1993: soaking up cultural influences “the assent of man”

A

Similar to automatic disposition model — first stage is to accept what you’re told as true, second stage is to correct, but only if you have time, ability and motivation to do so. Accept cultural influences as true. This develops stereotypes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Chanowit & Langer 1981: premature cognitive commitment

A

We accept cultural stereotypes early on and don’t counter-argue because it is not relevant to us at the time — but it can come back to bite us later in life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Steele & Aronson 1995: stereotype activation (group identity)

A

Activating or making group identity salient has effect in persons motivation and performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

Ambady, Shih, Pittinsky: cultural infusion of stereotypes

A

Made gender or ethnicity salient through simple drawings of two children playing together and then administered an age appropriate math quiz. Asian American 5 year old math performance increased when priming their Asian identity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

Fredrickson et al: priming stereotypes

A

Asked to rank 3 consumer products — unisex fragrance, clothing and food item, including trying on a swimsuit or sweater in the mirror, then took 15 min GMAT quiz. Women who tired on the bathing suit did worse on the math test, males’ math performance was unaffected

66
Q

Weisbuch, ambady, et al: steryotipic/racist nonverbal reactions

A

Edited sound out of clips of popular tv shows and analyzed how much character liked who they were talking to based on facial expressions. There was a significantly greater dislike shown toward black vs white characters even though they were of equal status.

67
Q

News magazines and TV news broadcasts

A

Poverty in America stories disproportionally depicted black families (65% of the time) even though black families only represented 29% of americas poor population

68
Q

Payne et al: historical roots of racial bias

A

Can trace the historical roots of implicit racial bias in slavery by overlaying IAT scores with density of slavery

69
Q

Uhlmann, Poehlman, and Bargh on Max Weber: the Protestant work ethic

A

Fascination in America of the minimum wage dishwasher who wins the lottery and continues working. Only occurs in America

70
Q

Uhlmann et al: the puritan ethic

A

Founding puritan ethic for austerity and denial of pleasure, against promiscuity and for self-denial and control

Second Asian Americans possess both Asian and American identities

71
Q

Zillman & Bryant: excitation transfer theory

A

Arousal carries over to other activities
Right after exercise on a bike = awareness of arousal and awareness of its source = no effect
10 minutes afterward = no arousal, no awareness or arousal = no effect
5 minutes afterward = arousal still present, no awareness of arousal = effect

72
Q

Dutton & Aron: pedestrian bridge

A

After getting given a pretty girls phone number: more calls after walking across the rickety bridge than the safe bridge because the person is more aroused. Even though participants insisted it had nothing to do with the bridge

73
Q

Schwarz & Clore: weather effect on mood

A

The days weather significantly affected life satisfaction ratings, but not when attention was called to the weather. Illustrates the misattribution of current feelings to plausible cause, and demonstrates general lack of awareness of true source of those feelings

74
Q

Hirshleifer & Shumway: how the weather affects us

A

Found that sunshine was strongly and significantly correlated with stock returns and showed that the days weather induces happiness and upbeat moods that transfers to economic behaviour

75
Q

Post conscious effect/carryover effects

A

Misattribution of the reason for later behaviour or feeling to features of the present, not realizing the effect of the recent past

76
Q

Maxur, Amir & Ariely: the dishonesty of honest people

A

Given the opportunity to cheat by recycling their answer sheet after so there was no evidence how many they did people cheated given the opportunity but not when they recited the 10 commandments prior to the test

77
Q

Sharif et al: meta-analysis of religious priming studies

A

Unconscious reminders, prompts, and cues about religious beliefs increase subsequent prosocial behaviour, moral behaviour, and altruistic behaviour

78
Q

Gary Dell 1986: cascade model of language production

A

How thoughts and ideas are put into grammatically correct order, unconsciously

79
Q

Storms 1958: Task carry over effects

A

Tasked participants with memorizing words and then had them freely associate them. Unexpectedly, storms found that words presented in memory task were more likely than usual to be given as associates

80
Q

Segal 1966/67; Koriat & Feuerstein 1976: priming as an experimental technique

A

Words presented in a first task were more likely that usual to show up as free associates in a subsequent task, even though participants had failed to recall them at the end of the first task.

81
Q

Implicit memory

A

Influences of experience on judgement and behaviour in the absence of explicit memory for those experiences

82
Q

Schacter, Weiskrantz, Reber: Amnesiac priming effects intact in dense amnesia

A

Exposure to words in the first task increases likelihood of use in the second task even though they do not remember even being in the first task at all

83
Q

Higgins, Rholes & Jones: memory words effect on impression

A

Participants studied “memory words” (trait words like adventurous) and then were given an impression task. Participants tended to interpret ambiguous behaviours in terms of memory words and their liking of the target person in the impression task was influenced by the memory words from the first task — a carryover effect of one task to the next

84
Q

Srull & Wyer: priming effects on judgement using scrambled sentence test

A

Exposure to trait terms influenced the participants judgment of the target in the story they read afterwards.

85
Q

Bargh, Chen, Burrows: carryover effects on behaviour (study 1)

A

Primed rude or polite words on a purported language task then measured how long it took for the participant to interrupt a conversation in the hallway. Most participants did not interrupt at all after polite priming

86
Q

Fouls et al: contagion rudeness in the workplace

A

Catching rudeness is like catching a cold
Study 1: partners rudeness in negotiation affected own rudeness in next 2 interactions
Study 3: witnessed rude (or polite) behaviour of one employee to another after being asked to take the weekend shift then answered customer emails; those who witnessed rude behaviour were more likely to be rude when writing back.

87
Q

Perception-behaviour Link

A
  1. Principle ideomotor action
  2. Mimicry, imitation, vicarious learning
  3. ‘Mirror neurons’ and premotor cortex
88
Q

Hommel and others: Ideomotor action (monkey see monkey do)

A

Perceiving another’s actions make it more likely you will do the same thing because of shared representations for the same kind of action

89
Q

Jeannerod 1999; perani et al 1999; Grezes & Decety 2001: activation of motor representations

A

Merely hearing a verb, or retrieving a verb from memory, activates corresponding motor representations in the brain

90
Q

Chameleon effect

A

Non conscious behavioural mimicry

91
Q

Perception-behaviour link

A

Infants show mimicry at a very young age, supporting its “hard-wired” nature

92
Q

John cacioppo: loneliness

A

knowing just 1 lonely person increases your risk of loneliness by 40%

93
Q

Kramer et al 2014: Facebook study

A

Facebooks own researches manipulated ‘news feed’ to make it more positive or more negative than usual, by allowing more of one or the other type of post through usual filter. Changing the news feed changed users’ own mood or positivity/negativity of their own posts

94
Q

Chatrand and Bargh: Chameleon study 2

A

Confederate deliberately imitated participant, participant later rated the interaction as having gone more smoothly, and liked the confederate more if they had subtly imitated vs not imitated them. Unconscious imitation thus increases bonding and liking between initial strangers.

95
Q

Chatrand & Bargh study 3: ratings of smoothness interaction

A

People who are more empathetic also found to imitate more than non empathetic individuals

96
Q

Jacob et al: effect if mimicry on sales of electronics

A

When customers were mimicked they were 80% more likely to buy a MP3 compared to 62% of those not mimicked; there was also a greater liking of the clerk and the store itself

97
Q

Wiltermuth & Heath: synchrony and cooperation

A

More rhythmic synchrony produces ‘group-like’ bonds between strangers. Participants engaged in activity together creates greater trust and cooperation among former strangers in economic game.

Ex: church rituals

98
Q

Zajonic, Niedenthal 1987: couples and their appearance

A

Couples judged as looking more similar the longer they’ve been together because they mimic facial expressions and behaviour

99
Q

4 External cues for behaviour

A

Action concepts: trait terms, verbs
Observed behaviour of others
Signs/consequences of behaviour of others
Situational features

100
Q

Mark Frank: Positive interrogation techniques (chameleon effect)

A

Facilitating bonding through imitation and mimicry increased information attained and also the quality of the information attained

101
Q

Harris, Bargh, Brownell 2009: food ads prime eating behaviour

A

Children and adults viewed 5 min TV comedy show with embedded food ads. There was a bowl of snacks in front of the participants. Those exposed to food ads ate 45% more of the snacks while watching the tv show

102
Q

Naimi et al (2016): Alcohol ads and teenage drinking

A

Strong positive relation between the number of alcoholic drinks consumed and the amount of alcohol ads viewed. Only worked on kids that had already tried drinking before

103
Q

Contagion and conformity

A

Perceive more than just the physical, we also perceive situations that have certain kinds of behaviours associated with them

104
Q

Langer et al: situational scripts

A

We assume that certain events will follow the usual pattern and sequence that we are accustomed to for example church service, daily routines. It saves limited attention but can miss deviations and cause us to make mistakes.

105
Q

Situational cues to behaviour

A

Features of common situations can also activate behavioural tendencies, and promote conformity to social norms

106
Q

Aarts & Dijksterhuis: the silence of the library

A

Student taking a note either to the cafeteria or the library. Student taking note to the library were quieter and talked more softly in the hallways than if they were on the way to the cafeteria. Location influences behaviour

107
Q

Kay, Wheeler, Bargh & Ross: Briefcase and the Backpack: priming the prisoners dilemma

A

Backpack primed cooperative behaviour, briefcase primed competitive behaviour

108
Q

Berger et al: priming contextual influences on voting behaviour

A

Voting in a school resulted in more support for education. Voting in churches resulted in voting in line with religious or church positions. Contextual priming influences important real world decisions

109
Q

Cohn, Fehr, & Marechal: situated identities

A

Significantly greater over-reporting for bankers when their banker identity was primed in the coin toss game than when it was not. Situated model of behaviour, using priming produce unconscious influences

110
Q

Lhermitte syndrome

A

Patients had Frontal lobe damage, those who Lhermitte mentioned the word museum to prior to entering an apartment proceeded to tour it, inspecting objects as if it were a museum. Patients also primed with the word doctor, acted as if they were a doctor and took the examiners blood pressure.

111
Q

Keizer et al: the spreading of disorder

A

Anti-social behaviour is contagious. If more graffiti is seen in the area this results in an increase of anti-social behaviour. Another example are the highway death toll signs that resulted in an increase in the amount of deaths on the highway instead of a decrease

112
Q

Robert Cialdini: social norms and disobedience

A

Having three burglars on the national park signs preventing taking redwood bark resulted in an increase in redwood bark being taken than signs with only one burglar.

California electricity consumption study: main factor was neighbours behaviour but respondents said it was the least influential factor

113
Q

Must we always do what others are doing?

A
  1. Passive contagion influences are overridden by current purpose
  2. Motivations and goals dominate other influences when they conflict

What is good for the current goal is the main determinant of what you do

114
Q

Macrae & Johnston 1998: priming helping

A

When helping was primed they picked up more pens unless the pens were leaky. Thus there was an increase in helping when primed except when it conflicted with an important goal

115
Q

Chatrand, Maddux, & Lakin 2005: motivational moderators of perception-behaviour effect

A

More likely to imitate people in your group to build rapport, affiliate goals, develop interdependent culture and an empathetic personality

116
Q

Leander et al: you give me the chills

A

Imitation by in group member results in the room feeling warmer
Imitation by out group member results in the room feeling colder

117
Q

What are the things we make immediate and unintended evaluations of

A
  1. Faces
  2. Beauty/attractiveness
  3. Group membership
  4. Similarity to self
118
Q

Willis & tordorov 2006: faces

A

Trait judgements of faces presented for 100 milliseconds were no different than notches made with no time constraint. Additional time may increase confidence but it doesn’t change the judgement itself. For all judgements — attractiveness, like ability, trustworthiness, competence, aggressiveness did not change with increased time

119
Q

Ballew & tordorov 2007: competence judgments and faces

A

Given 100 ms, 250 ms, and unlimited time individuals made the same choice of the competence of us gubernatorial and senate candidates. Ratings predicted 69% of governor and 72% of senate races.

120
Q

Fiske, cuddy, Glick 2007: dimensions of impression formation

A

The two most important dimensions of impression formation:
1) warm/cold — friend or foe?
2) competence, ability — are they capable

121
Q

Olivola & Todorov 2010: faces and diagnostics

A

Faces are not diagnostic of the traits we immediately perceive in them

122
Q

Darwin 1872: expression of emotions in animals and man

A

The social nature and purpose of emotional expression is an immediate and involuntary communication to others about the current situation

123
Q

Why are faces so powerful?

A

Short term expressions are valid cues as to probable behaviour that is relevant to us

124
Q

Zebowitz & Montepare: overgeneralization of inferences from faces

A

We overgeneralize the automatic inferences we make from faces, placing too much confidence in them and acting on them as if they were strongly diagnostic even though they aren’t

125
Q

Why we like symmetric faces

A

We see symmetric faces as more attractive, averaging faces via morphing procedure produces more attractive faces: the more faces included in the average, the more attractive the face is.

Probably a cue to disease and health status

126
Q

Slater et al: newborns prefer attractive faces

A

Infants spend more time looking at attractive faces

127
Q

Karremans et al 2009: men distracted by attractive women

A

Men work in on a demanding cognitive task in psychology experiencing were more distracted and did worse on the task when in the presence of an attractive vs unattractive female

128
Q

Misattribution of immediate affective responses

A

Affect comes from unknown source or a source we think shouldn’t influence us, those feelings are then misattributed to other more plausible causes, often what we are currently consciously focusing on.

129
Q

Why is the automatic affect especially prone to misattribution?

A

Because the person is not aware of the process that produced it. Also because they experienced it immediately and preconsciously and it is therefore trusted as valid

130
Q

What is the halo effect

A

The tendency to believe that attractive people also possess other positive qualities beyond their physical appearance

131
Q

Brusetta et al 2013 — in Maestripieri et al: real life effects of attraction driven by reproduction goal

A

Job applicants that were viewed as attractive received a disproportionate amount more callbacks that those that were viewed as unattractive

132
Q

Why is friend or foe important

A

During our species long development, violent death at the hands of others was common, so it was important for survival to make quick judgements on who was a friend and who was a foe

133
Q

Kelly et al: infants and ingroup preference

A

Preferential attention task: how long do infants look at the same race vs different race faces? Caucasian children measured looking tune within pairs of own race vs other races

Newborns: no preference
3 month olds: prefer looking at faces of the same race as themselves

134
Q

Greenwald, Banji, Nosek: automaticity of stereotype affect: the implicit associations test

A

Negative (or positive) affect automatically associated with social category. It becomes active immediately and automatically to influence responses without intention and despite attempts to control it

135
Q

What will the IAT show

A

If you implicitly associate white with good and black with bad, you will be faster when the white and good buttons are the same and black and bad buttons are the same, slower if reversed

136
Q

Affective bases of prejudicial behaviour

A

Immediately produced affect can be misattributed to the person with whom one is interacting. This is especially problematic when a person’s group membership (stereotype) produces the affect, so negative affect is attributed to his or her behaviour, appearance, personality, etc.

137
Q

How do stereotypes form?

A

Automatic stereotype activation during perception produces negative affect without person knowing

138
Q

Donn Byrne — Attitude Similarity

A

Manipulated similarity of attitude and value surveys, people liked the other person more to the extent their attitudes and values overlapped. In-group membership also signals shared goals and values

139
Q

Pelham et al: implicit egotism

A

The tendency to prefer people, places, or things that remind one of oneself like similar birthdays or similar names. This unconscious bias occurs because most people posses highly favourable unconscious associations about themselves

140
Q

Pelham & Cavallo: Name-letter effect

A

Positive feelings about self spill over to objects, events, people, outcomes, that share one’s initials, birthday, other self-defining features

Ken = more likely to move to Kentucky

141
Q

Pelham & Carvallo 2015: superficial similarities also help

A

Shared birthday, month, hometown or states, shared initials, help with positive notions of objects, places, people, and things.

Sharing one’s birthday has a significant influence on the choice of spouse, disproportionately marry someone with the same birthday number as them.

142
Q

Walton et al, 2012: role of identity-similarity on motivation

A

Found that a shared birthday with a math award winner in October had actual positive effects in students math class performance that year in May because of the superficial similarity

143
Q

Adolf hitler and rose nienau

A

Hitler befriended a 9 year old Jewish girl because she had the same birthday as him

144
Q

Zajonc 1980: immediate unconscious evaluation

A

Argued against standard model of rational, deliberate, effortful, and feature-based evaluations. Instead: immediate affective appraisal, and a separate ‘affective processing systems’. Affective and cognitive processing can proceed in parallel, and affective responses can be faster and precede cognitive analysis

145
Q

Zajonc 1980: mere exposures

A

Affective reactions are independent of cognition. Present novel objects 1, 3, 9, 25 times. Participants had a greater liking for ‘old’ than ‘new’ in the absence of ability to discriminate old from new at better than chance

146
Q

Implicit memory effect:

A

Greater liking for previously presented stimuli, in absence of conscious recognition

147
Q

Fiske 1982: category based effect

A

Association of an item as good (or bad) over time creates an automatic association. Example of mere expression

148
Q

Fazio et al: automatic attitude activation

A

Immediate affect without separate systems. Automatic evaluation on mere presence (perception) of stimulus

149
Q

Posner & Snyder 1975: sequential priming task

A

Only automatic responses possible until 500 ms. Strategic responding possible after 500ms

150
Q

Sequential priming task

A

Shown photo, and then a word association and there’s a choice between good or bad, and the measure the time between the choices. Strong attitudes resulted in quicker responses

151
Q

Fazio et al: evaluation of attitudes

A

Associated a photo with 2 words then decided if they were good or bad. Strong attitudes but not weak attitudes primed targets at short time intervals. Strong attitudes become active automatically, weak ones do not.

152
Q

Bargh, Chaiken et al (1992,1993,1996), re-do of Fazio et al.

A
  1. Removed conscious evaluation task
  2. Inserted a two day delay between measure of attitude strength and test of automaticity

Found that the results worked for both strong and weak attitudes towards different things

153
Q

Herring et al: 25 years of automatic evaluation research

A

Everything immediately evaluated as good or bad

154
Q

Roe & Simpson and Ernst Mayr, evolutionary biologist: functional adaptive reason for direct influences of evaluation on behaviour

A

Nature can only select based in overt behaviour, not on what is going on in the animals head

155
Q

Bargh and Morsella 2009: unconscious behavioural guidance systems

A

Automatic immediate affective reactions would not have evolved if they only lived in the head. Natural selection works on behaviours, whether they increase or decrease survival and reproductive success. Thus all of the automatic attitude and other immediate affective reactions must have a direct influence on our behaviour in the moment.

156
Q

TC Schneirla 1959: approach and withdrawal across animal kingdom

A

Nearly all species including single called paramecia show approach/avoid motivations. Immediate evaluation is in the service of immediate action. Survival advantage and natural selection work on overt behaviour, not internal processes

157
Q

Chen & Bargh: approach vs withdrawal

A

Bad vs good things on screen automatically generated response wither to push away (bad) or pull towards (good)

158
Q

Slepian, Young, Rule, Weisbuch, and Ambady: house vs face classification task

A

Participants pull faster in response to trustworthy compared to untrustworthy faces

159
Q

Examples of behavioural consequences of unconscious evaluations

A
  1. Voting for candidates
  2. More likely to hire and promote attractive people
  3. More likely to trust or not
  4. Choices of places to live, occupation, when and who you marry
160
Q

Corrrell et al 2002: the police officer dilemma

A

Already have weapon drawn and ready to fire but stereotypes and implicit biases govern if they actually pull the trigger or not