Relevancy and Excluding Relevant Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Relevant Evidence

A
  • any tendency to make a fact more or less probable
  • generally = admissible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Relevant evidence EXCLUDED IF:

A

-unfairly prejudicial
-misleads or confuses the jury
-causes delay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Authentication

A

Must show that “the evidence is what it purports to be”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Authentication: How to Authenticate?

A
  • direct testimony
  • special markings
  • testimony with PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Self-authenticating

A
  • official/notarized document
  • does NOT require additional testimony
    ex. newspapers, seal, notarized
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Character Evidence

A
  • bad things the DEFENDANT did in the past
  • NOT ADMISSIBLE
  • too prejudicial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Character Evidence: when admissible in civil cases

A

when it is at issue:
- defamation
- child custody
- negligent entrustment
- misrepresentation/fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Character Evidence: when character is at issue

A

when it is at issue for 4 applicable civil cases = can be proven using reputation, opinion, and specific acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Character Evidence: admissible in CRIMINAL cases

A
  • D opens the door w/ evidence of good character
  • D introduces evidence of pertinent trait – honestness or peacefulness
  • prosecution can rebut evidence of same trait
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Character Evidence: MIMIC is ADMISSIBLE

A

Motive
Intent
Mistake (absence of)
Identification
Common scheme or plan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Character Evidence: self-defense

A

D CAN show plaintiff was the initial aggressor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Character Evidence: prior acts of child molestation

A

other instances of child molestation are admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Habit Evidence

A
  • habit = routine practice
    ADMISSIBLE if habit is done all the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly