RESEARCH MATHODS (YEAR 2) Flashcards
When is sign test used
• We are looking for a difference not an association
• We need to use a repeated measures design
• We need data that is organised into categories-nominal data
What is critical value
• Significance level desired
• The number of participants (the N value)
• You need to identify whether you are using a one-tailed or two-tailed test and the significance level you desire before you can use the critical table effectively.
Statistical testing MUST LEARN
U better have learnt it (steps on Showbie rsm)
Significance and probability facts
• All statistical tests employ a significance level.
• You can reject the null hypothesis and claim you have found a significant difference/
correlation
• However: there is a 5% probability that the observed effect occurred by chance
Critical value and calculated value facts
• Your results or calculated value needs to be compared to the critical value
• Each test has its own critical value table
• Sometimes the critical value is equal to/ greater than. Sometimes is equal to/ less than
What is type I error
Type I: is when the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, but it should be the other way around; In reality the null hypothesis is true
This is referred to as an optimistic error or false positive as the researcher claims to find significance that does not exist.
What is type II error
Type II: when the null hypothesis is accepted, but the alternative hypothesis should have been. Pessimistic error or false negative
Reliability meaning
is the overall consistency of a measure.
External reliability meaning
refers to the ability of the test to produce the same results each time it is carried out.
Test - retest meaning
A person repeats a test a month or so after doing the test the first time.
Internal reliability meaning
is the extent to which a test is consistent within itself.
Split half meaning
Compare an individual’s performance on two halves of a test.
Inter rater reliability meaning
Two or more interviewers/observers must get the same outcome on 80% or more of the behaviours.
The role of peer review in science
This involves all aspects of the psychological research being scrutinised by a small group of two or three experts in a particular field
Peers should be objective and unknown to the researcher(s)
Main aims of peer review
To allocate research funding
To validate the quality and relevance of research
The suggest amendments or improvements
Government run funding organisations- medical research council
Quality and accuracy – the formulation of the hypotheses, methodology chosen, statistical tests
Minor revisions and improvements- work is not appropriate and should be withdrawn
Anonymity what happens
The peer should remain anonymous to maintain an honest appraisal
- A minority of reviewers may use their anonymity to criticise rival researcher who have crossed them in the past
Direct competition for grants/ funding
Some journals make the names of the reviewers’ public
Publication bias
There is a tendency for editors to publish significant ‘headline grabbing’ findings to increase credibility and circulation of their publication
• Could create a false impression of the current state of psychology if editors are selective in what they publish
• File drawer problem- especially in meta-analysis were non-significant or negative results are not published
Burying ground breaking research
Reviewers are especially critical of research that contradicts their own and are favourable to those that match theirs.
• Reviewers tend to be established scientists and are more likely to publish research that ‘fits’ with current opinions rather than new and innovative research that challenges