Respiratory Flashcards
Aspiration Pneumonia CXR
usually involves
- posterior segments of the upper lobes and superior segments of the lower lobes if recumbent
- basal segments of the lower lobes if erect
initial antibiotic choice
- benzylpenicillin 1.2 g IV, 6 hourly plus either
- metronidazole 500 mg IV, 12-hourly or
- metronidazole 400 mg orally, 12 hourly
•in patients with penicillin hypersensitivity use either
- clindamycin 450 mg IV or orally, 8 hourly or
- lincomycin 600 mg IV, 8 hourly
Location
- the left lung is more commonly affected than the right (60:40)
- the posterobasal segments of the lung are involved in 2/3 of cases
Right heart signs
- usually only present with large PE
- loud pulmonary closure sound
- wide splitting of second heart sound
- right ventricular gallop
- right ventricular heave
- JVP
- elevated
- prominent a waves
•localised rales, rhonchi, rub
what is PERC
Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria [PERC]
•parameters at initial ED assessment
- < 50 years of age
- pulse rate < 100 beats/min
- SpO2 > 94% on air
- no unilateral leg swelling
- no haemoptysis
- no surgery or trauma within 4 weeks
- no previous DVT or PE
- no oral hormone use
•the absence of all of the above criteria
-3% false negative rate for PE (LR- 0.17)
- probably not quite sensitive enough for clinical use
- would reduce need for any further testing (including D dimer) in approximately 20% of cases
What are the CXR finding in PE
cardiomegaly
- elevated hemidiaphragm - common
- small pleural effusion
- transient pulmonary infiltrates, especially wedge shaped (infarction)
- Westermark’s sign
- prominent PA
- abrupt cut off of peripheral vessels
- normal vessels should be visible within 2 cm of chest wall
Hampton’s hump
- pleural based opacity (pulmonary infarction) with convex border medially
- often in costophrenic angle
- elevated hemidiaphragm
- difference in size between equivalent pulmonary vessels
- abnormal radiolucency in some lung zones
- loss of lung volume
What are the advantages of V/Q and disadvantage
Diagnostic when the results are normal or indicate a high probability of PE
- •use when CTPA is contraindicated
severe renal impairment, or iodine or contrast allergy
- lower radiation exposure than CTPA
- especially to the breast
- appropriate for patients for whom radiation is undesirable
- e.g. younger patients, women, pregnancy - rate of non diagnostic scan may be minimised in selected patients
- young pregnant population with normal CXR (compared with older, non pregnant population) - suitable for follow up of PE
recognises small and large PE, so progression / regression may be studied
Disadvantages
- interpretation linked to pre-test probability
•high and low probability scans have a PE likelihood of 88% and 4% respectively
- rather than the desired 100 and 0%
1. high rate of non diagnostic scans, which then warrant further imaging
e. g. intermediate or low-probability scan plus high clinical suspicion for PE
- does not provide alternative diagnosis if PE absent
- not useful if prior lung disease
- although diffuse disease such as APO or reticulonodular disease does not cause the perfusion lung scan to be abnormal in 70% of cases
- residual perfusion defects present in 10 - 30% of patients with previous PE
- incomplete resolution more common in patients with underlying cardiopulmonary disease
- not as rapid as CTPA
- not suitable for the unstable patient
- limited availability at some centres