Section 4.3

Question 1

If the police mess up and violate your 4th amendment rights the evidence cannot be used in court based on what rule?

Answer 1

Exclusionary rule

Question 2

If the police violate my rights and search my backpack and find drugs they violated my fourth amendment rights according to the exclusionary rule because they did not have consent or a warrant. Because of this what happens?

Answer 2

The drugs are no longer admissible in court

Question 3

Court case dealing with incorporation

Answer 3

Mapp v Ohio 1961

Question 4

If the police violate your rights to get one piece of evidence and then because of that piece of evidence they find another piece of evidence. What does this refer to?

Answer 4

fruit of the poisonous tree

Question 5

After Weeks vs US for example if the police violate your rights and search a backpack but while searching they find a stolen key. the backpack would be tossed but would the stolen key would have still been admissible. true or False

Answer 5

True

Question 6

Until 1961 the fruit of the poisonous tree and the exclusionary rule only applied to who?

Answer 6

Federal

Question 7

The federal fourth amendment did not apply until what court case?

Answer 7

Mapp v Ohio

Question 8

The 14th amendment deals with what

Answer 8

due process

Question 9

There are a few exceptions to the exclusionary rule. One is inevitable discovery. What court case determined this?

Answer 9

Nix v Williams 1984

Question 10

The police were going to find it anyway.

Answer 10

Inevitable Discovery

Question 11

On the way to jail after a guy had murdered a girl and buried her in a field the officer in a way persuaded the guy to give the evidence without his lawyer present and this was a violation of his rights. However, the location he took the officer to for the body the police were already looking and this only speeds up the search. This was considered what ?

Answer 11

Inevitable Discovery

Question 12

Good Fatih. What court case?

Answer 12

US vs Leon

Question 13

the police apply for a warrant and they did everything right. the magistrate messed up. the police served the warrant in good faith and the Supreme Court ruled that as long it was not the fault of the police the exclusionary rule would not be invoked. True or False

Answer 13

True

Question 14

As long as the police are acting in good faith things can be introduced at trial even after your rights were violated. True or False

Answer 14

True

Question 15

Usually with a crime scene there is no expectation of privacy so do we need to worry about warrants or an exception to the warrant requirement?

Answer 15

no

Question 16

Do not touch anything until you are ready to and make sure every single person at the crime scene is supposed to be there!

Answer 16

TRUTH

Question 17

What is the biggest way to screw up a crime scene?

Answer 17

let people in who are not supposed to be in the crime scene

Question 18

Hairs, fibers bullet casings, dropped weapon, money, blood stains, and a lot of different stuff. These are all examples of what?

Answer 18

Physical Evidence

Question 19

Is it sometimes better to send two people to search for physical evidence?

Answer 19

YES

Question 20

Whatever the shape of the space you are searching is you need to find a good pattern to search the area to be sure that you do not miss anything. True or False

Answer 20

True

Question 21

If you have a reason to detain the driver that gives you a reason to detain the occupants. What case?

Answer 21

Michigan v Summers 1981

Question 22

Do you need individual probable cause to detain each person or if you have probable cause can you detain them all? (Maybe not true for arrest)

Answer 22

You can detain them all if you have probable cause for one person

Question 23

Vehicle Modifications are something you need to look for. Make sure to not miss anything that is not standard. True or False

Answer 23

True

Question 24

What case says that dog sniffs are not a search?

Answer 24

Illinois V Caballes 2005

Question 25

Can a dog alert provide probable cause to search a vehicle ?

Answer 25

Yes

Question 26

Example, if a police pulls someone over and they get the dog out and it sniffs around the outside of the car and signals that it smells drugs can that be probable cause for the officers to search the car?

Answer 26

Yes

Question 27

What case says that a dog alert provides probable cause to search a vehicle?

Answer 27

Florida v Harris 2013

Question 28

What court case has to do with Thermal Imaging?

Answer 28

Kyllo v US 2001

Question 29

Growing marijuana inside a home would put off a lot of heat and the thermal imaging would let them know. the officers used this to get a warrant and the Supreme Court said that it was not allowed because what?

Answer 29

It was expanding your perceptions well beyond plain view.

Question 30

A thermal imaging system is not commonly available to everyone and therefore it is no longer _____ ______.

Answer 30

Plain view

Question 31

Binoculars are okay. Thermal imaging is not because it is not something that is readily available to everyone. true or false

Answer 31

True

Question 32

What case deals with GPS?

Answer 32

UK v Jones 2012

Question 33

Police attached a GPS to a car and used it to track them but it was ruled unconstitutional for a few reasons with one being

Answer 33

When the person changed from public to private roads it was an invasion of privacy