Serious assaults Flashcards

1
Q

R v Taisalika

A

R v Taisalika
The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced on the complainants head would point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define ‘wounds’

A

Wounds:
A breaking to the skin normally evidence by a flow of blood and will more often than not be external and may be internal.
R v Waters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define ‘Maims’

A

Will involve mutilating, crippling or disabling part of the body so Victim is deprived of the use of a limb or of one of the senses. There needs to be some degree of permanence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define ‘disfigures’ and its case law

A

to ‘disfigure’ means to deform or deface. to ‘mar’ or alter the figure of appearance of a person.

The word ‘disfigure’ covers not only permanent damage but also temporary damage.
R v Rapana and Murray

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define ‘injure’ and its case law

A

Injure:
S2 CA61
means to cause actual bodily harm

‘Bodily harm’.. includes any hurt or injury, calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the Victim.. it need not be permanent, but must no doubt, be more than merely transitory or trifling.
R v Donovan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Donovan

A

‘Bodily harm’.. includes any hurt or injury, calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the Victim.. it need not be permanent, but must no doubt, be more than merely transitory or trifling.
R v Donovan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define ‘reckless’ and its case law

A

With reckless disregard to the safety of others:
Acting reckless involves, consciously and deliberately taking an unjustifiable risk.

R v Harney
(Recklessness involves) forsight of dangerous consequences that could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct, regardless of the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define ‘Tihi’

A

R v Tihi
In addition to one of the specific intents outlined in paragraphs (a)(b)(c) “it must be shown the offender either meant to cause the specified harm or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose other to risk of suffering it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define “Stupefies”

A

Stupifies
To “stupify” means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person, which really seriously interferes with that person’s mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime.
R v Strum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Strum

A

To “stupify” means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person, which really seriously interferes with that person’s mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime.
R v Strum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Waiti

A

R v Waiti
There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault of by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define ‘ renders unconscious’

A

Renders unconscious

to render a person unconscious, the offenders actions must cause the victim to lose consciouness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define ‘ Any violent means’ and its case law

A

Any violent means:
Includes the application of force that physically incapacitate a person.

R v Crossan
“incapable of resistance” includes a powerlessness of the will as well as a physical incapacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly