SHO Flashcards

1
Q

Potential in SHO

A

v(X) = 1/2 kx^2 = 1/2 mw^2x^2 h^2

since w = \sqrt(k/m)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

first step to sovling SSE

A

change vars to dimensionless quantities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why charcteristic length sclae for QHO but not CHO

what are the other dimensionful parameters

A

Quantum intorudes hbar (length scale) where classical no length scale

other dimensionful parameters: m and omega

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

charcteristic length scale

A

[Length] = a = \sqrt(h/mw)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Characteristic energy scale

resulting from new dimensionfull parameter

A

1/2 h w

energy if you were osciallating at characteristic length scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

techniques to solve QHO

A
  1. Solve DE (Recursion rel.)
  2. algebraic method: raising and lowering ladder operators
  3. shooting method where you tune E till see correct boudnary conditions where WF decays exp adn get even/odd solns oscil. (numerical methods)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

properties of WF of QHO

A

All WF are bound states
even odd ocillataing solns
all normalisable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

NBNBNB Energy of QHO in 1d

A

En = h w (n+1/2)

for n = 0, 1, 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quantum number labelling comaprision

A

QHO n = 0, 1, 2 (since E still != 0 when n =0 , E = hw/2)

in ISW n = 1,2,3 to void E = 0 , since there E ~ n^2 (w/o constant factor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How are the energy evals of QHO spaced

A

Evenly spaced (since E ~n)

unlike ISW where E~n^2 and so gaps increased quadratically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the evenly spaced gaps in QHO

A

Gaps evenly spaced by hw

since E = hw (n + 1/2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Eigenfunctions of QHO consis of which parts

A

3 parts

  1. normalisation constnat (ugly but not significant properties)
  2. Hermite polynomial (degree of n , either odd or even)
  3. Gaussian
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hermite polynomial ‘function’ in QHO solution

A

H_n(x/a)

ORGTHOGONAL polynomials (give rise eigfunc orth)

polynomial degree n
even or odd dep on whether n is even or odd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gaussian in QHO soln

A

width of a

exp(-x^2/2a^2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hermite polynomia expression in QHO

A

H_n(x/a)

where n = 0, 1, 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

First & second &thrid polynomial for n= 0, 1, 2

A

H_0 (x) = 1
H_1 (x) = 2x
H_2 (x) =4x^2 -2

17
Q

Hermite polynomial def

A

H_n(x) = (-1)^n e^(x^2) d^n/dx^n e^(x^2)

18
Q

GS of QHO from full soln

NBNBNB

A

WF = (norm const. ) (Hermite) (gauss)

for Ground state:
WF = (norm) H_0 (x/a) (gaussian width ~a)
= (norm) (1) (gaussian width ~a)
~ gaussian

so the GS of QHO is a pure gaussian

19
Q

GS of QHO shpae and reason

A

H_0 = 1 so GS is constn times gaussian (width ~a)

gs is also even (expected for symm potential)

nodes = 0

20
Q

WHy enegry index match wf #nodes

A

nodes = n

n starts at 0 and there are 0 nodes in GS

21
Q

Degen in QHO

A
No degen (in 1d)
Each WF has 1 E
22
Q

what happens in classical forbidden regions

A

QHO soln WF decays to 0 exponantially

23
Q

where is probability of WF maximal in QHO

A

At the classical turning points

24
Q

In the CHO the min energy at the bottom of well is E = 0, in QM qhat is the min energy and why

A

QHO E_0 = hw(0+1/2) = hw/2

in CHO = <p> = 0 sim wwen the particle stands still at the bottom of the well with lowest energy.

In QHO whe CANNOT have = = 0 sim ,since x and p DO NOT COMMUTE. so there must be some uncertainty but we do have that = </p><p> = 0 s, but this des not tell us their uncertainties are zero as in classical case

(sigma_x sigma_p >= h/2) so at minimise uncertainty E_0 = (h/2) (w) mult by w do get enrgy units
=> E_0 = hw/2</p>

25
Q

Which parts of WF are gaussian resp, and which the Hermite poly

A

for n = 0: H_0 = 1 so only gaussian width ~a inside well

for n > 0 H-n > 1 and so Hermite poly responsible for oscillating behavoiur inside well,
Gaussian resp for exp decay outside well

26
Q

WHy can tunneling resulst in -kinetic energy

A

Particle simply does not have well defined kintetic energyin QHO so -kinetic energy is okay

27
Q

expectations values of QHO

, <p></p>

A

<p> Undergo perfect SHO
e.g of correspondence principle that expectation values of observables behave classically
</p>

28
Q

What happens at large ENegies(large n)

A

The hermite polynomial term grows and thus osciallated rapidly inside well (so that it appears relatively constnat) like one big parabola

e.g. of BOhrs formualtion of corresp. principle, that for large energies the quantum proabbility (expectation val) resemble`s classical

29
Q

FTramsform frpm x to p

A

ionside integral mult by exp(ikx)

30
Q

FTramsfpr, from p to x

A

inside integral mult by exp(-ikx)

31
Q

Delta function fourier representaton

what does it revel

A

delta centred at x0 = constant factor times int over all space of (exp(ik(x-x0)))

it revelas that the fourier transform over a delta function is just a constant function