Stats Flashcards
Berksons bias
False observation of negative correlation between two positive traits. Ie only have one. ACTUALLY = UNEQUALLY OBSERVED
Hawthorne effect
Observer effect!
Individuals modify behaviour in response to being observed. BUT OBSERVER EFFECT
Also secondary observer effect ie researchers looking at q responses
Neyman bias
Selection bias eg v sick or ill excluded from study!!
Ie died excluded - less severe
Ie recovered exluded - more severe
Case control
Compare groups of cases and controls re exposure factors often nested eg sample of controls
Clear case definition
ODD RATIO = EST RELATIVE RISK rare disease assumption
Ie cases: exp/non exp divided controls: exp/non exp
Care with matching ie over match/factors affecting exposure as it should be equal in groups
Cohort study
Compare exposed and non exposed re incidence of disease
Longitudinal v restrospective/historical
Measure exposure
Match or id confounders for analysis ie counterfactual ideal
Measure outcomes
Analyse
GENERAL PMR
Proportional mortality ratio deaths given cause/total deaths in same time period
SMR - deaths in study pop/expected deaths in general pop. Standardise w age bands/gender
Types of comparison
Internal ie unexposed IN cohort ie exp unexp in cohort of factory workers
External ie similar cohort of factory workers or gen pop. May differ! Gen pop needs to have low rate of exposure!!
Cohort study weaknesses
Healthy worker effect ie gen pop sicker if used as controls
Loss to FU ie TIME - bias = difference between groups DIFFERNTIAL
Difficulties w long latency or rare diseases. TIME/RESOURCES!
Limited records/info ie on exp in retrospective
Cohort studies strengths
Longitudinal - clarity re sequence CHAIN OF EVENTS
Calculate INCIDENCE and RISK
RARE EXPOSURE
MULTIPLE EFFECTS
Longitudinal avoid enrolment SELECTION BIAS
Case control advantages
RARE DISEASES Long LATENCY - resources!! Easier to obtain exp data DYNAMIC POP MULTIPLE CAUSES/exp
Case control disadvantages
SELECTION BIAS
Inefficient RARE EXPOSURE
OBSERVER BIAS
ODDS RATIO not relative risk or CAUSATION
Confounder definition
A confounding factor independently determines the risk of disease/outcome studied and is UNEQUALLY distributed between groups ie is correlated with exposure
NOT PART OF CAUSAL CHAIN OF EVENTS
Positive = stronger
Negative = weaker assoc
Sources of bias
Unrepresentative of pop/inaccurate info
Selection bias
Information bias
Observer bias
Recall bias
Interpretation of associations
Bias
Chance
Confounding
Effect modifier - other causative factor part of causal chain of events
Linear regression
X axis = independent variable
Y axis = dependent variable ie effect being studied
Y=mx+c
Correlation coefficient +- 1 = strongest association
Distribution
Mode = most freq value ie uni bimodal
Positive skew - long upper tail, pulls mean up
Negative skew - long lower tail, pulls mean down
Mean - weighting or geometric ie log, mean, anti log
Median
Range
Percentiles ie 5th = 5% values below
Quartiles ie 25-75th in box plot
Standard deviation
Dispersion of values about mean
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION 95% values within +-2SDs of mean
Coefficient of variation SD/mean x 100