Task 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Frequency method

A

Recording the number of times a particular behavior occurs within a time period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duration method

A

How long a particular behavior lasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intervals method

A

Divide observation in discrete time intervals and record whether occurs within each interval; the intervals need to be short enough that only one instance of a behavior can occur during an interval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Time sampling

A

Alternate between scanning the group for a specific period of time and then recording the observed behaviors for the next period

Appropriate when behavior occurs continuously rather than in short bursts over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Individual sampling

A

Select a single subject for observation over a given time period and record the observed behavior

Appropriate when you want to preserve the organization of an individual’s behavior over time rather than note how often particular behaviors occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Event sampling

A

Observe only one behavior and record all instances

Appropriate when one behavior of interest can be clearly defined and focused on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ethnography

A

A researcher becomes immersed in the behavioral / social system being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sociometry

A

Identifying and measuring interpersonal relationships within a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case history

A

Deeper observations and reporting on a single case (or few cases); Case is the subject of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Archival research

A

Studying existing records

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Content analysis

A

Analyzing a written, visual or spoken record for the occurrence of specific categories or events (e.g. pauses in a speech), items (e.g. negative comments) or behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Information extraction

A

An advanced content analysis procedure using specialized information extraction techniques to study large databases such as medical records and e-books

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Behavioral measures

A

Direct, objective measures of behavior, which include frequency, latency (e.g. reaction time) and number of errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Physiological measures

A

Measuring the CNS (brain activity with fMRI, EEG, etc.) and PNS (heart rate, breathing etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Self-report measures

A

Subjective measures of what a person thinks / feels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Implicit measures

A

Measures that measure unconscious responses (e.g. implicit association test)

17
Q

Reliability

A

The reliability of the measure is it’s ability to produce similar results when the measure is taken several times

18
Q

Margin of error

A

When measuring psychological variables, in which the problem is to estimate the average value of the variable in a
given population based on a sample drawn from that population, the precision of the estimate (its likely variation from sample to sample) is called the margin of error.

19
Q

Test-retest reliability (temporal consistency)

A

Applying the measure twice after a sufficient long time that the subject does not remember their previous answer

20
Q

Parallel-form reliability

A

Same as test-retest, but the second form is a different one, supposedly equivalent to the first one

21
Q

Split-half reliability

A

Two parallel forms of the same test are shuffled together and applied; then the results on the 2 forms are compared

22
Q

Validity

A

The validity of a measure is the extent to which it measures what you intend to measure

23
Q

Face validity

A

How well the measure appears to measure what it is supposed to measure

24
Q

Content validity

A

How well the content of measure (e.g. a questionnaire) samples the knowledge, skills or behavior that it is intended to measure

25
Q

Criterion-related validity

A

How well the score on a test (measure) can be used to predict an individuals value on some criterion measure

26
Q

Concurrent validity

A

Scores on test and the criterion are collected at the same time; high concurrent validity means high correlation

27
Q

Predictive validity

A

Scores predict directly related behavior in the future

28
Q

Construct validity

A

How well does the questionnaire measure the underlying theoretical constructs (unobservable variable that is thought to reflect the behavior of interest based on some theory)
A questionnaire has high constructs validity if people who score high also behave as predicted by the theory

29
Q

Accuracy

A

The accuracy of a measure is the extend to which it produces results that agree with a known standard (e.g. a weight scale indicates X kg if a standard x-kg weight is placed on it)

30
Q

Range effects

A

They occur when the values of a variable have a lower or upper limit; Range effects limit the values of the highest (or lowest) data points, thus decreasing the differences among the group means, maybe to the extent that no statistically reliable difference will surface between the groups.

31
Q

Expectancy effects

A

A researcher may have preconceived ideas about how participants should behave and subtly communicates it to them, thus affecting their behavior

32
Q

Single-blind technique

A

The experimenter does not know which treatment a subject has been assigned to

33
Q

Double-blind technique

A

Neither the experimenter nor the participants know at the time of testing which treatments the participants are receiving

34
Q

Automating

A

The experimenter uses computers as much as possible to reduce experimenter bias

35
Q

Likert scale

A

Provides a series if statements which indicate degrees of agreement and disagreement

36
Q

Kuder-Richardson formula

A

Yields the average if all the split-half reliabilities that could be derived from splitting the questionnaire into two halves in every possible way