Test 2 (Apr 16) Flashcards
Policy Goals II
What is a key component of CA’s efforts in sport for development?
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E)
Policy Goals II
What are 5 conclusions for policy
- Participant needs
- Participant safety and wellbeing
- Nature and quality of the sport experience
- Sport is not sufficient
- Program sustainment
Policy Goals II
What are some obstacles facing SDP initatives?
White elephant facilities and images presented by Olympic and pro athletes give little confidence that sport can actually improve the lives of ordinary people, let alone the sick and poor
Policy Goals II
Is SDP a priority for Sport Canada?
No, the effort was unsucessful. As a result, all financial support of SDP has been phased out.
Sport Participation
What is the ‘rational recreation movement’? What 2 things was it trying to accomplish?
A movement organized in Victorian-era England that promoted physical activity and sport participation among the middle class.
- social control and self improvement
Sport Participation
What was the rational for providing urban spaces for public participation?
People should be involved because sport and recreational physical activity are good for them and for society.
Sport Participation
Difference in attention to sport participation and sporting excellence?
A lack of formal policy dealing with participation is part reason for low levels of sport participation in CA.
Governments, NSOs, PSOs… have focused their attention and funding on high performance sport.
Sport Participation
Why does the govt focus on high performance sport? And what is the ‘Pyramid’?
- Bc it commands media attention in a way that participation doesn’t, and bc govts claim positive effects from medal winning and national pride.
- idea that a broad base of participation is necessary in order to discover and develop talented athletes that will be recruited to high performance sport
Sport Participation
What are the 4 main sources of provision for sport participation?
- Educational system
- Clubs
- Commercial sector (includes non-profit)
- Levels of government
Sport Participation
What 2 major trends have affected sport participation since the 1970s?
- Sportization - even when young, winning was the goal, if you weren’t good, you weren’t playing, development of policies and governing bodies
- De-sportization - everyone participates, everyone has a chance, prioritizes other things than winning, tries to increase participation in populations less likely to achieve is sports, leads to widespread growth of physicial activity and sport
Sport Participation
Commercialization
The growth of commercial-sector provision in sport in 1980s. Resulted in growing interest in informal forms of participation, led the govt to provide more to meet that interest.
Sport Participation
Active Living
Part of shift in CA sport in 1980s, made a direct connection between participation and population health; became a policy tool
Policy Issues I: Doping
What happened at the 1952 Games?
Brought into significance the overt politicization of the Games.
- use of PEDs by American and Russian weightlifeters
Policy Issues I: Doping
1983 Pan Am Games, escalation of PED use and response
- 19 atheltes, 2 Canadians, tested postivie and were ejected, even more left for “personal reasons”
- scope of steroid use in international sport became clear
- Arthur Porritt claimed doping is evil, morally wrong, and dangerous
Policy Issues I: Doping
1984, Sport Canada and CAO created doping policies, what were the 3 aims of the policy?
- Indicate that the use of PEDs/procedures is prohibited by the Olympics
- Respect all sanctions imposed by the IOC, and they have the right to impose bigger sanctions for competitions
- Athlete’s obligation to follow all doping control protocol, ensure athletes’ due process, and require all personnel to sign declaration
Policy Issues I: Doping
Sport Canada’s Revised Doping Policy
- 1985 issued a revised policy in response to continuing infractions
- objective is too completely iradicate the use of PEDs
Policy Issues I: Doping
2 anti-doping agencies
- WADA
- Canadian Policy Against Doping in Sport
Policy Issues II: Mega-Events
What is a mega-event?
large-scale, planned occurences of limited duration that has major impact on all aspectes of the host region
- considered mega if it has significant and/or permanent urban effects
Policy Issues II: Mega-Events
5 staples in CA’s hosting policy’s history
- hosting policy was founded on providing opportunities for CA athletes to compete on home ground
- applied both national and international sport events hosted in CA
- brought from discontent of events held without federal approval
- realized fed govt needed to work closer with other levels of govt, govt agencies, and the private sector
- most recent change was a 10% increase in the govt’s cap on contributions to international sport events held in CA
Policy Issues II: Mega-Events
In anticipation for the 2008 hosting policy, they identified issues surrounding the hosting of international events: (5)
- increasing financial pressures on all levels of govt
- concerns over the limited financials, sport programming, and facility legacies
- imbalance of international events across CA
- best interests of sport overlooked by gains in tourism and local economies
- inconsitent measures of the economic impact of the events