The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Different Electoral Systems Used Within The UK Flashcards
Proportionality
FPTP has no proportionality. The conservatives got 43% of the vote but 56% of the seats. This is unfair as they’re over represented
AMS has more proportionality as in 2021 the conservatives got 22% of the vote and 24% of the seats. There are times where this doesn’t happen (2011 SNP got 44% of vote and 53% of seats)
Overall AMS is stronger but still has issues
Choice
FPTP doesn’t have much choice. Labour and Conservatives are the only two parties likely to form the government
AMS gives more choice for a regional vote. An example of this is how the Green Party do well in Scotland but not Westminster.
Overall AMS is better at providing choice for the electorate
Representation
FPTP has a winner takes all system - many constituencies across the country where the winning candidate has more votes against them than for them. An example of this is in 2021 Gavin Newlands got 47% of the vote but more people voted for other parties
AMS provides better representation in Scottish Parliament as there are many parties scrutinising the work of the government. There is better representation of LGBT and BAME in Scottish parliament than Westminster too.
AMS has much better representation than others
Constituency Link
FPTP has a strong constituency link meaning people know who their MP is and can contact them
AMS can be strong but confusing. Since AMS provides you 8 MSPs, this can get difficult to know who to contact
Overall FPTP is better as they know who their MP is and it’s easier to understand. AMS is less clear regarding what MSP helps with what
