Thomas reid Flashcards
How does Thomas Reid begin the first chapter of ‘an inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense’
By surveying the sad state of philosophy of mind. There are no principles of the mind that have been proved in the way that astronomy or optics has proven theories or laws of nature.
What does he say about the cogito ergo sum
That the premise is no more certain than the conclusion but that this is not a argument for scepticism, since no one can seriously doubt the conclusion in the first place!
Does reid think philosophy and common sense are opposed?
He thinks they ought not to be, and that some of the problems that permeate philosophy is its leaving behind of common sense, reid thinks philosophy would do much better if it re-joined genuine reason (common sense).
What does Reid think is the hierarchy between philosophy and common sense?
He thinks that common sense does not depend on philosophical reasoning, but that it is the foundation from which philosophy springs. If one attempts, through philosophy, to demolish all of our common sense beliefs then philosophy goes down with it. (I take this to mean, trust in the demonstrations and philosophical process requires belief in many of the common sense notions that are being ‘refuted’)
Where does Reid think sensations exist?
Only in sentient things.
When I remember a sensation I had in the past, what is the object of my thought and what is the alternative possibility that Reid denies?
The sensation itself
A present idea of a past sensation
List Reid’s ‘original principles of beleif’
memory
sensation
belief in one’s own existance
inductive principle
What is Reid’s idea of ‘original principle of belief’.
Those ‘original principles of belief’ or ‘first principles’ are the things on which everything else depends, and the justification for believing them depends on nothing else. They fall, not within the principle of reason, but of common sense.
What is simple apprehension?
The bare conception of a thing without any belief in it
What relationship between imagination, sensation and memory does Reid think is absurd?
That they are all of the same kind but difference in degree e.g., a belief is a very lively idea, an imagination less so.
What does it mean, according to Reid, for something to be a principle of common sense?
Principles of common sense are those things we cannot help but believe by our constitution and that we could not properly live without but cannot provide a reason for.
Why does reid think the existence of a artificial language requires the original exitance of a natural language?
Because artificial signs must be agreed upon, but we could not agree on anything in the total absence of signs, so a natural language must have come first.
What, according to Reid, is the first, second and third classes of natural sings, what is the significance of each
First: the connection between the sign and the things signified laid down by nature but is unearthed by experience.
Second: The connection between the sign and the thing signified is laid down by nature and discovered by a natural principle.
Third: When a sign signifies something of which we have no conception or experience of e.g., hardness and extension,
Significance: underpinning of philosophy; underpinning of the arts; underpinning of common sense
What is Reid’s inductive principle?
The continuance of connections that arise in experience
What does Reid think cause and effect are equivalent too?
Signs and the thing signified. Reid does not think that we perceive proper causation (similar to Hume)
What are the two ways that reid thinks men come to know about, and form opinions of, the mind?
The way of reflection
The way of analogy
What is the way of reflection, according to reid.
The way in which men come to form opinions about the mind by attending to the actual operations of the mind. Reid thinks that this is the only way to form accurate notions of the operations of the mind.