Torts Damages/Causation/Defense New Flashcards

1
Q

Superseding cause

A

Intentionally intervening event which is not in the scope of the risk of their negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Negligence causation question

A

Actor’s liability is limited to those harms that result from risks that made the actor’s
conduct tortious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Old Rule for scientific evidence

A

Science must be generally accepted by the scientific community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

New rule for scientific evidence

A

Douburt rule

Technique in question can be tested
Subject to peer review
It’s known or potential error rate
Existence and Maintenence of standards controlling its operation
Whether it has acceptance in the relevant scientific community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 theories of causation when there are mulitple causes of the harm

A

Joint tortfeasors
Acting in concert
Alternative Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

UCFA

A

Uniform Comparative Fault Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contributory Negligence

A

(1) It is the traditional rule;
(2) If P was also negligent and his negligence was a cause of the injury
(3) P could not recover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 Types of Comparative Negligence, and what should you use on your exam?

A

(1) Pure Comparative Negligence
(2) Modified comparative negligence

Use UCFA (1) on Exam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Comparative Negligence

A

(1) It is the modern rule
(2) If P was also negligent
and;
(3) his negligence was a cause of the injury
then;
(4) P could recover only a portion of the damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

UCFA adopts what kind of neg. damages?

A

UCFA adopts “pure” comparative negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Market Share liability

A

When
(1) Multiple D’s sold a defective product that caused harm
and;
(2) P’s are unable to identify the manufacturer of the product that harmed them,
(3) Courts can impose liability based on each D’s share of the market
and;
(4) D’s are only severally liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statute of limitations

A

Until P discovers, or should have discovered their injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Joint Tortfeasors

A

2 or more D’s acting independently, but each is neg. and causes the harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Acting in concert

A

2 or more D agree to do something that is neg. and causes the harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Alternative liability

A

2 D act neg. but only one is the cause of the harm, and it is uncertain which - so the burden of proof is shifted to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Joint liability

A

We must pay total

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Several Liability

A

We each must pay our part of the total

18
Q

Joint and several

A

We each must pay our part of the total and we must pay the total

19
Q

UCFA joint and several liability

A

We each must pay our part of the total and we must pay the total.
If a party cannot pay, multiply their percentage by the remaining parties percentages and that is your new percentage needed to pay

20
Q

UCFA, when a party pays more than their equitable share

A

They seek judgment for contribution against other parties

21
Q

UCFA claim and counterclaim

A

The dollar amounts don’t cancel each other out.

22
Q

Assumption of the risk; Express agreements, Liability waived?

A

Express agreements where a person waives liability for the D’s negligence is not enforced if it violates public policy

23
Q

3 types of assumption of the risk?

A

(1) Express assumption of the risk
(2) Primary implied assumption of the risk
(3) Secondary implied assumption of the risk

24
Q

What is Preemption?

A

When federal and state law conflict, state is preempted under the supremacy clause of the constitution

25
Q

3 kinds of preemption

A

(1) Express Preemption
(2) Field Preemption
(3) Conflict Preemption

26
Q

Express preemption

A

When congress enacts a statute that expressly preempts a state law

27
Q

Conflict preemption

A

(1) A state law is preempted
if it stands as an obstacle to the execution of the full purposes and objectives of congress
and/or;
(2) when it is impossible for a private party to comply with both state a federal laws

28
Q

Where state tort law requiring strong warning labels is not preempted by federal FDA regulation

A

Wyeth v. Levine

29
Q

Wyeth v. Levine

A

State tort law is not preempted by FDA federal regulations

note - the intent of the fed. law was to supplement state tort law

30
Q

Damages; Pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life

A

In most states pain and suffring includes damages for loss of enjoyment of life in a single award

In some states, the jury is instructed to award seperate damages for loss of enjoyment of life

31
Q

What is a Survival Action

A

Allows the estate of a deceased victim to recover for any injuries the victim suffered up until the time of death

32
Q

Loss of consoritum is included, in many states…

A

In their wrongful death statutes

33
Q

When a trial judge thinks an award is excessive…

A

they may grant a remittitur

34
Q

An appellate court may overturn a judgement for excessiveness

A

Only if it
(1) Shocks the concious
and;
(2) suggests passion or prejudice from the jurors.

35
Q

When a case involved intentional or reckless harm

A

A jury can award damages “for the sake of example” to deter similar behavior

36
Q

An employer…

A

Cannot be held liable for punitive damages if the conduct was approved by the principal or managerial agent

37
Q

If punitive damages are grossly excessive

A

It shall be considered an arbitrary deprevation of property weithout fair notice under the due process clause of the 14th amendment

38
Q

Punitive damages as excesssive factors

A

(1) degree of reprehensibility of the conduct
(2) Disparity between degree of harm and the punitive damages (it should not exceed 9:1 ratio
(3) difference between punitive damages awarded and civil penalties for comparable conduct

39
Q

Example of an asset which cant be seized, and realistic way to settle a lawsuit

A

Housing, so Insurance realistically is the only way to cover the costs of a lawsuit

40
Q

Tunkl Factors to waive express liability bro

A
  1. Business is suitable for public regulation
  2. Service is of great importance
  3. Party will perform service for every member of the public
  4. Party has an advantage in bargaining power
  5. Purchaser is placed under control of the seller, subject to risk of carelessness by seller and agents
  6. Any other circumstances