Unit 1 Flashcards
Fiske (2008)
Treatment Integrity on individual interventions
Rodriguez et al. (2009)
Coaching feedback on Teacher implementation fidelity of FSS
Anderson & Borgmeier (2010)
Tier II interventions in a school setting
Frieder et al. (2009)
Teleconsultation in school settings (ran FA)
Thorne & Kamps (2008)
Effects of a group contingency intervention (lottery & Pizza party)
Farrell et al.(2008)
Self Monitoring of Math Skills (MotivAider)
Figarola et al. (2008)
Effects of self graphing (excel) (girl with phys disability did not benefit initially)
Heinicke et al. (2009)
differential reinforcement to decrease academic response latency (1 participant, crazy time criteria, tokens for play breaks)
Pace et al. (2006)
antecedent intervention in brain injury rehab
(Fiske) Measurement factors affecting TI
OMC
Operational definition
Measurement of TI
Calculation of TI
(Fiske) Consultation factors affecting TI
Controllable: TCT Treatment Char Consultant Char Training and feedback Not Controllable: CC Consultee char client char
(Fiske) TI guidelines
ROMCTC Relationship between TI and outcome Operational Definitions Method of gathering TI (accurate, reliable) Calculate to provide most info Training Consultation (on going)
(Rodruiguez) FSS
First step to success: manualized intervention strategy that uses cards to minimize attn for inappropriate behavior while providing clear info re: right and wrong, and appropriate alternatives
Rodruigez Result
integrity decreased and behavior increased in baseline, then decreased in treatment
Rodriguez suggestions
FA
Integrity
relationship between integrity and behavior
Students may need to contact contingencies