Unit 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Fiske (2008)

A

Treatment Integrity on individual interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rodriguez et al. (2009)

A

Coaching feedback on Teacher implementation fidelity of FSS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Anderson & Borgmeier (2010)

A

Tier II interventions in a school setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Frieder et al. (2009)

A

Teleconsultation in school settings (ran FA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Thorne & Kamps (2008)

A

Effects of a group contingency intervention (lottery & Pizza party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Farrell et al.(2008)

A

Self Monitoring of Math Skills (MotivAider)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Figarola et al. (2008)

A

Effects of self graphing (excel) (girl with phys disability did not benefit initially)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Heinicke et al. (2009)

A

differential reinforcement to decrease academic response latency (1 participant, crazy time criteria, tokens for play breaks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pace et al. (2006)

A

antecedent intervention in brain injury rehab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(Fiske) Measurement factors affecting TI

A

OMC
Operational definition
Measurement of TI
Calculation of TI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(Fiske) Consultation factors affecting TI

A
Controllable: TCT
Treatment Char
Consultant Char
Training and feedback
Not Controllable: CC
Consultee char
client char
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(Fiske) TI guidelines

A
ROMCTC
Relationship between TI and outcome
Operational Definitions
Method of gathering TI (accurate, reliable)
Calculate to provide most info
Training
Consultation (on going)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(Rodruiguez) FSS

A

First step to success: manualized intervention strategy that uses cards to minimize attn for inappropriate behavior while providing clear info re: right and wrong, and appropriate alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rodruigez Result

A

integrity decreased and behavior increased in baseline, then decreased in treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rodriguez suggestions

A

FA
Integrity
relationship between integrity and behavior
Students may need to contact contingencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A&B Tier 2 interventions include

A
explicit instruction of skills
structured prompts for appropriate behavior opportunities for the student to practice in vivo
frequent feedback to the student
system of fading
communication with parents
17
Q

Frieder Telecommunication Tips

A

Practice data collection
record all sessions
compliment telecommunication with on-site
provide intense support initially then fade
arrange time for people to coordinate
invest in quality tech

18
Q

Heinicke Limitations

A

TDA
txt integrity not measured
data on accuracy not collected
Anologue environment

19
Q

Pace Reccomendations

A

allow more time for successful responding
intersperse mastered questions with acquisitions
change type of responding required
active participation
increase number of opportunities the student has to respond

20
Q

Authors Anagram

A

FRAFT FFHP
Fiske - TI of indivudual interventions
Rodriguez - Coaching and feedback on TI of FSS
Anderson and Borgmeier - Tier 2 interventions
Freider - Telecommunication
Thorn and Kamps - group contingency intervention/ind
Farrell - motivaider
Figarola - excel
Heinicke - beat the timer to get play breaks
Pace - antecedent interventions for ABI