Unit 2 Flashcards
Criminal vs Civil Law
criminal - vs society, civil - vs individual
Conditions (WHSP)
considered wrong, cause harm, serious, punishable
What are the legal rights?
If constitutional rights conflict with duties/limits of Criminal Code court references section 1 (reasonable limits).If it limits the behaviour too much, the law is unconstitutional.
Summary offence
less serious, max penalty = $2000 and/or 6 months prison. (ex. causing a disturbance, taking vehicle w/out consent, possessing marijuana)
Indictable offence
serious (ex. murder, B&E, robbery), no time limit on laying a charge
- accused can either choose a: provincial court judge, judge of the superior court, or higher court w/ a jury
Hybrid offence
Crown has the right to proceed summarily or indictment. - - Treated as indictment until a decision is made. Based on previous records, if lesser punishments are appropriate. Max penalty = 2-10 yrs. (ex. of hybrid offences: impaired driving, assault, public mischief under $5000)
Actus and mens rea
“Actus rea” wrongful deed
“Mens rea” criminal intention
Elements of an offence
Intention Criminal state of mind Recklessness Criminal negligence Attempt Conspiracy
Aiding vs Abetting
aid - urging to commit
abet - assisting
Under s. 21(2) of Code, just as guilty of the crime
Accessory after the fact
one who knows a crime has been committed and helps the accused hide/escape.
organized crime
3 or more ppl w/ a common identity opposing authority. taking advantage of open markets. Under s. 467.11, ppl facilitating gang offense are just as guilty
How do police use a search warrant?
They need a search warrant by applying to a judge/justice of peace and show concrete (reasonable/probable) grounds, be objective
Before arrest, police can:
- issue an appearance notice
- arrest the suspect
- obtain a search warrant
When do police issue an appearnace notice?
When the suspect is seen to not be a further threat + will show at a bail hearing. If more indictable, they arrest them in custody to lay charges, and preserve evidence.
Steps to a Lawful Arrest (5, NACCP)
- notice (identify himself): “I am __”
- advise the accused is under arrest and the pffence charged with “I am arresting
- caution 1, right to counsel
- caution 2, right to remain silent
- physical touching to signify custody
When can police use “as much force as necessary”
If the suspect resists, use of more force, however, can result in criminal/civil assault charges on the officer
citizen’s arrest
citizen can make an arrest, must surrender to the police asap.
Duties of Police Services
Crime prevention, law enforcement, assistance to victims of crime, maintenance of public order, maintenance of public order, emergency response, investigation
Search Laws
Officers can enter property w/ a warrant only on the date indicated, areas, and items outlined. A telewarrant (phone, fax, email) used in remote areas.
Exception: Under the ‘Controlled Drugs and Substance Act’, police can search any non-private place w/out a warrant for search of drugs
When can an officer search w/out a warrant?
If the arrested is thought to carry a concealed weapon
- arrest w/out warrant only if they are caught in the act OR on reasonable and probable grounds
On being arrested, what must an officer do?
tell you of legal aid (paid by taxpayer), and duty counsel (govt lawyer providing advice)
After an arrest, what must be done?
Within 24 hrs, a judge decides if the accused remains in custody after the bail hearing (released before trial). If they release, it is based on habeas corpus
Also, the person must be released if the officer thinks they present no further danger and will appear on trial. Others are recorded of charges and fingerprinted,
When is the person detained?
Thought to commit offences, be a threat to the victom/witnesses, interferes w/ investigation or not appear.
may have a bail hearing ($ guaranteed to court)
Upon release, what must be done?
Person signs an undertaking and/or a recognizance to appear in court.
When awaiting trial, what happens?
Accused consults defense lawyer and revel everything connected to the case. If they confess guilty, the lawyer cannot say so otherwise.
Disclosure: All evidence against the accused must be revealed to the defense, the defense attorney need only disclose alibi defese
When can an accused choose to be heard by a judge?
Summary: by judge only Indictable: By judge alone, or judge+jury
Plea
on the 1st appearance date: guilty or not guilty
Preliminary hearing
for serious offences, determining if there’s enough evidence to proceed to trial in higher court
Adversary system
Trial based off Crown (society) and Defense (accused). Onus (duty) on crown to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that person commited actus/mens rea
Judge vs justice of peace
“Bench” or “higher court”, judges control courtroom in preliminary hearing.trial, justices are in pre-trial
Crown prosecutor
Lawyer hired by attorney general so justice is done, (Principle of disclosure: to present all evidence)
Defense counsel
rep. accused, ensures rights are protected
Court clerk
Reads charges of accused, swears in witnesses, etc
Court Recorder
sits at witness box, records evidence, transcript
sheriff
crown appointed official, ensures the accused is present, obains jurors, carries out court orders
Stages in a Criminal Trial (12) (Evidence)
- arraignment - charge and plea
- jury selection
- crown presents evidence
- defense cross-examines witness
- defense motions for dismissal
- defense presents evidece
- crown cross-examines witness
- defense may re-examine witnesses
- crown rebuttal
- defense rebuttal
- judges’ charge to jury
- jury reaches verdict
How are jurors selected?
For serious indictable offences, 12 jurors selected within the area. Sheriff+selection commitee choose out of 75-100 names. Selected are summoned to court with a warrant or are charged if no show. Crown and defense can accept/reject, judge chooses which q’s to ask
Requirements for Jury
not to: discuss case w/anyone else, follow media reports, disclose discussion outside of court
Judges may sequester (isolate) the jury, a new trial can be set if there are less than 10 jurors, not paid in short trial
Challenges in jury
Both sides want the jury to be responsive to their position, defense has right to first challenge, 3 challenge: jury list, cause, peremptory
Presentation of evidence
- Arraignment
- Crown evidence
- Defence Evidence
- Witnesses
Types of Evidence: Privileged communications
any evidence that cannot be presented in court, crown can’t compel spouse to give evidence, but a spouse can give evidence for defense (exceptions: crimes against the spouse, sex crime against minors) other ex. doctor-patient, clergy-parishioner, layer-client
Similar Fact
Accused committed similar offences in the past, judge holds a voir dire where jury leaves and lawyers/judges debate to determine whether or not to admit similar fact evidence
Hearsay
not coming from direct, personal experience, or knowledge of a witness. 3rd party who didn’t see actual incident, must be necessary + reliable to be admitted
Opinion
Must be from an expert (ex. autopsy)
Character
Crown often introduces negative traits + history
Photographs
must be accurate representations
Electronic Device and Video Surveillance
Warranted, treated as last resort
Polygraph
not admissible after R. v. Phillon
Confession
Accused admits some charges are true. Excluded if the witness is not informed of their rights beforehand. Statement can be inculpatory (admits to be true) vs. exculpatory (denial, not guilty)
Illegally obtained evidence
S. 24 allows the court to consider whether it should use this evidence. would admitting it bring ‘hurt’ to the reputation of the justice system? Factors: severity, how
Judge vs justice of peace
“Bench” or “higher court”, judges control courtroom in preliminary hearing.trial, justices are largely in pre-trial, had at least 10 yrs experience