Using analytics for review Flashcards
76. You are responsible for conducting second pass review using email thread visualization. You are asked to review a set of email threads with coding conflicts. You must review the threads, confirm coding, and make any necessary changes. Your instructions are:
• There is at least one Responsive document in each thread, which makes all the documents in the thread Responsive. However, only documents coded Responsive should be coded on the Privilege field.
What can you determine from the email thread visualization? (Select all that apply.
a. All the documents in the thread are tagged Responsive.
b. There are Responsive, Unreviewed and Non-Responsive documents in the thread.
c. There is a coding conflict in one of the email families.
d. The non-inclusive email has been coded Responsive.
77. The Review Manager asked you to review the coding on documents that are textual near duplicates. You are asked to use a view to find any inconsistencies in the coding. The review requirements are:
• Review any documents in the same Near Duplicate Group that have a similarity score of 95% or greater if coding decisions are in conflict.
Using the instructions above, what can you determine from the view about the coding for Textual Near Duplicate Group REV01?
a. Document REV02 should be coded as Responsive.
b. All the documents in the group should be reviewed again.
c. Only documents REV01 and REV02 should be reviewed again.
d. All the documents in the group should be mass edited on the Responsive field to match the principal document.
78.) What describes an inclusive email?
a. It is always the first email in the thread.
b. It has unique content not included in any other email in the thread.
c. It must contain at least three recipients.
d. It will never be the last email in the thread.
79. What is a benefit of using email threading and email thread visualization to review documents, as opposed to traditional linear review from the document list view? (Select all that apply.)
a. You can more easily see the entire email conversation.
b. A single thread group may include emails collected from multiple custodians.
c. You can see where new emails branched off from the original branch.
d. Using email threading automatically includes these emails in the conceptual index.
80. What differentiates an email thread group from an email family?
a. An email thread group is a single conversation that starts with the original email and includes all subsequent replies and forwards, and can include email families.
b. An email family includes only the first and last email in the email thread group.
c. Relativity Analytics puts all attachments from an email thread group into a single email family.
d. An email family includes only the inclusive emails from an email thread group.
81. You are reviewing a document and would like to find documents that are conceptually similar to the entire document you are currently reviewing. How can you do this?
a. Click the View Similar Documents button in the viewer.
b. Highlight a paragraph of text in the document and use the conceptual analytics index to search this text.
c. Choose the most relevant phrase from the document and run a dtSearch on this phrase.
d. Use the Related Items pane to look for textual near duplicate groups.
82.) What can you see using email thread visualization? (Select all that apply.)
a. Inclusive emails in the current email thread.
b. Duplicate emails in the current email thread.
c. Attachments in the current email thread.
d. Inclusive emails from the next email thread.
83. What is the most efficient way to QC coding decisions in an email thread?
a. Use email thread visualization to highlight the coding decisions in the email thread.
b. Create a saved search of all reviewed emails in the thread, and include family documents in the saved search.
c. Use a dashboard to view coded documents in the thread by custodian.
d. Sort your document view to see the most recently coded documents first.
- You are told the following paragraph is highly relevant:
* Though my view is still that these valuations, looked at in isolation, are correct, the entire LJM structure is deeply flawed and, in my view, has not been executed with the best interest of Enron’s shareholders in view. To give you an analogy, a building inspector would act unprofessionally and unethically if he gave a clean bill of health to a kitchen, without alerting the buyer that the rest of the edifice is rotten.*
You would like to use a search to return other documents that may be closely related to the paragraph above. What should you do to return the best results?
a. Build a saved search with multiple conditions separated by logic groups.
b. Use a dtSearch to search for several key words from the text.
c. Run a concept search on the entire relevant paragraph.
d. Search Google to learn more about LJM structure. Then use proximity search syntax to search for key phrases.
85. What is a good example source to use for a concept search? (Select all that apply.)
a. A paragraph from the case complaint.
b. A sentence from a relevant web article about the topic.
c. A paragraph you drafted with relevant example text.
d. A single word that you determined to be relevant to the case.
86. You are reviewing documents with email thread visualization, and notice some coding conflicts within the email thread. In order to resolve the coding conflicts, you want to code all documents in the thread group Responsive.
Where do you click to mass update the coding choices on the emails in this thread group so they are all are coded Responsive? (Click the location on the image.)
