Venue, Removal, Conflict Flashcards

1
Q

Can SMJ or venue be determined by k?

A

Only venue.

Court may have SMJ but not venue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Venue in civil action in fed courts is proper:

A
  1. district where any D resides, if all D reside in that state
  2. district where subs part of events/omissions giving rise to the claim occurred OR subs part of prop that is subject to action is situated
  3. no district that satisfies 1 or 2 = district where any D is subject to PJ for action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Domicile of business entities

A

in any district where it subject to court’s PJ re civil actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Domicile of non-US residents

A

may be sued in any district

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can J or venue be waived?

A

venue- yes, unless timely objection

J- no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why transfer venue:

A
  1. court does for parties/witnesses convenience
  2. all parties may consent
  3. court dismisses if improper venue
  4. in the interests of justice
    • used for a forum selection clause in k unless public interest dictates otherwise

always to a court where it could have been filed (SMJ, PJ over Ds, proper venue)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What law to apply if venue is transferred:

A

original venue proper- law of state of transferor

original venue improper- law of new state of transferee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can you remove from state to fed court?

A

by D if both:

  1. case could have originally been filed in fed ct
  2. cases removed for diversity, no D is a citizen of state where filed, as of date of removal

D can’t remove for fed question if no original fed question J

Fed ct may choose to hear a state ct action which is federal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who can remove?

A

Only D

More than 1 D- all Ds properly joined and served must join in petition for removal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State court with 1 fed claim, can you remove?

A
  1. no diversity or sup J- entire case may be removed to fed ct
    • multiple Ds- D’s related to fed claim must join in removal
    • fed ct must sever and remand state claims back
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When you can remove in diversity cases?

A
  1. may remove if non diverse party is dismissed, unless
    • 1 D is citizen of state of the state action
    • more than 1 year since state action commenced (unless P acted in bad faith to prevent D from removing)

for diversity removal, ct may find by a preponderance of the ev that a P seeking nonmentary relief exceeds 75k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How to remove:

A
  1. D must file notice of removal in fed district ct where action pending, within 30 days of being notified that the case is removable (via initial pleading/summons) (multiple Ds, go by last D given notice then early served D may join)
  2. notice to other parties and state court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

P can remand a case back to state ct when:

A
  1. fed no longer has fed J, all fed claims resolved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

FFC

A

fed court must recognize fed ct judgments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fed court enjoining pending state action (civil)

injunction

A

Fed court cannot unless:

  1. expressly auth by statue
  2. when necessary in aid of its J
  3. to protect or effectuate its judgments

if not enjoined, case decided first has preclusive effect on the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fed court enjoining pending state action (criminal)

injunction

A

Fed court cannot unless:

  • irreparable harm is clear and imminent (serious interference with 1st A rights)
  • and appellate remedy is inadequate to provide relief