Vicarious Liability Flashcards

Chapter 13

1
Q

Respondeat Superior

A

Holds an employer responsible for the wrongful acts of an employee, if the negligent act occurred within the scope of employment (during the course of their work)

  1. relationship of employer and employee must exist
  2. when employee committed the tort, he or she must have been acting within the scope of their employment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Vicarious Liability

A

A defendant is held liable for someone else’s tort, usually because of a special relationship

someone else is held liable for actions of a second defendant based on relationship between them, not because D first D is at fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can an employer be held liable for an accident caused by an employee that occurred while driving home from work due to an illness caused by poor workplace conditions?

A

YES
- although respondent superior doctrine does not usually apply to an employees drive to or from work (coming and going rule)
- but it will apply if it is foreseeable that a danger arising from or related to the employees work will cause harm to others during this drive

example - employee was inhaling fumes all day at work, that made it reasonable she can get in car accident on her drive,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

is an employee, who uses his car for work purposes, acting within the scope of his employment if he pulls into a gas station for an estimate on routine maintenance for the car?

A

he is acting within his employment when he is performing services for which he’s been employed to do

incidental task - slight deviation from duties of employment that is deemed within the scope of employment

YES, bcz the car is a company car, the gas station was on his way to his job, understood that employee must take car for maintenance and repair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

independent contractors

A

Person who is contracted to provide services to another entity as a non-employee, person is considered to be self employed

employer is not liable for damages caused by independent contractor (unless they fall under one of 4 exceptions)

  • if employer provides tools and instruments - then not independent contractor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is newspaper sales man who has no contact with publisher and was hired by third party an independent contractor ?

A

yes
- individual in work for a company where company has no control over the manner in which he completes his work is considered an independent contractor
- company can not be held vicariously liable, for any wrongdoing of independent contractor, company has no contract or direct control over person hired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

is owner of a car, who gets independent contractor to do manintence on the car, liable for harm caused by contractor negligence?

A

YES
- drivers can not pass duty to safely maintain their cars to others, including mechanics,
- even though mechanics failure to fix brakes causes issue, owner will be held responsible for mechanics negligent performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what type of acts can an independent contractor not be held vicariously liable for? (4 exceptions to vicarious liability with independent contractors)

A
  1. non delegable duties (employers can’t pass of certain important responsibilities to other workers like contractors, bcz those duties crucial for public safety, employer can not avoid responsibility if something goes wrong, even if they hired someone else for the job)
  2. apparent authority
    (if a company acts like a contractor is their own employee, they might have to pay for any problems caused by that contractor)
  3. inherently dangerous activities or peculiar risk of harm
    (if the job is rlly risky and needs special care, contractor should take extra precaution. if they don’t and something bad happens, employer couldn’t have expected, employer might be responsible
  4. illegal activities
    (obv if someone is doing something illegal, they can’t expect employer to cover for them if things go wrong)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Joint Enterprise

A

when there is an agreement either express or implied,

when a group of people agree to work together for a common goal that benefits them financially. each person in the group has the same level of control, and the project they are working on must have clear business, or money related purpose everyone shares.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bailments

A

when one person (the bailee) is voluntarily in possession of goods which belong to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

under family-car doctrine,
Is car owner liable if the car was negligently driven by another person, who had the owners consent to use the car and whose use was for the business or pleasure of the owners family?

A

YES
the family-car doctrine states that an owner of a car is held vicariously liable when the car is negligently driven by a member of the immediate household.

Parents of teenage drivers are liable even when the teenager was exceeding the scope of the permission.

This rule does not apply to chattels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Imputed contributory Negligence

A

In some states, if the negligent conduct of a driver can be attributed to the owner or passenger of the vehicle, the judge may decide to bar or reduce the amount the driver has to pay in damages to a third party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is a state vicariously responsible for actions of foster parents, when foster child is injured because of negligence of the foster parents?

A

NO, foster parents are independent contractors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Can an independent contractor surgeon, delegate the duty to keep track of the sponges used during surgery (to make sure that no sponges get left inside of patient) to the surgical nurse employed at the hospital?

A

NO, surgeon has nondelegable duty to account for all sponges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If a customer of a grocery store accidentally slips, falls, and injures themselves because there was a wet spot left on the floor by the overnight independent contractor cleaning crew, who is responsible?

A

THE GROCERY STORE, they have nondelegable duty to keep premises reasonably safe for customers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If foster care parents get into a car accident, as a result of their negligent driving which causes injury to their foster children, who is liable – the foster parents or the foster care agency?

A

FOSTER PARENTS, bcz they are independent contractors and the agency duty did not fall into nondelegable duty exception

17
Q

Should a cruise ship be held liable for the medical malpractice of the ship’s doctor?

A

no, cruise ship has no control over independent doctors actions

18
Q

If foster parents are found to have inflicted abuse upon their foster children, who is held liable – the state or the foster parents?

A

THE STATE, department of social services has duty to check on children to ensure safety is nondelegable

19
Q

If an independent contractor fails to clean up mud on the road, which results in a car sliding into another and thereby causing an accident, who is responsible for damages – the county or the independent contractor?

A

COUNTY IS RESPONSIBLE, bcz job of keeping road clear from hazard is very imp to public safety, bcz if independent contractor fail to do it correctly, their negligence is danger to public safety

20
Q

If a customer at Dairy Queen is injured because as they were opening the door to leave the store the glass shattered and cut them, who is liable – the Dairy Queen franchise or the franchisee (the independent contractor)?

A

Dairy Queen franchise is liable for the torts of the franchisee, because franchisor has set rules and guidelines the franchisee must abide by, franchise takes all precautions to protect the brands reputation, its in the hands of the franchisor
- DOES NOT MATTER If the agreement states that the franchisor is not responsible for day to day business operations - the franchisor is still liable

21
Q

If a small private plane is supposed to fly a corporation’s top employees from Chicago (during the wintertime) to a meeting in another state, and on the way the plane crashes – because the pilot was blinded by poor weather – who is liable for the passengers injuries? (The company that hired the plane or the pilot). In this scenario, the pilot warned the company that this flight was very dangerous if not carefully carried out.

A

the company because the company was told beforehand that flying at this time was dangerous but nevertheless assumed the risk.

(No malfunction in plane, or evidence the pilot was incapable, this would make pilot, independent contractor liable)

22
Q

employer - employee - master servant

A

usually if an employee does an act, the employer will be held responsible

employee will still b responsible for the tort, but employer will be held liable

plaintiff also only limited to recovering only the full amount of damages, only ONCE.

23
Q

can an employer - employee relationship exist even if the employee is not getting paid

A

YES

24
Q

if an employee serves and performs work assigned by the employer and acts in accordance with employers management

are they within scope of employment

A

YES THEY ARE ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT

25
Q

does acting independently without intention of serving employer act within the scope of employment

A

NO NOT ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT

26
Q

GOING AND COMING RULE

dual purpose exception

A

not liable during commuting time,

not to be mixed up with work related travel

employee stopped on way home, or employer has some sort of benefit

does the employer pay the employee for time and expenses in commuting