Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Political > War on Terror > Flashcards

War on Terror Flashcards

1
Q

Ganor 2002

A

Aphorism ‘one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter’ - highlights multiple ways vigilante of the war perceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Smith 2002

A

State, nation, sovereignity - smith tries to think about 9/11 as a geog event - local, national, global

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gregory 2004

A

Local impact of 9/11

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scheuer 2005

A

Anonymous, imperial hubris - justifications of 9/11, US various occupations abroad e.g.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Marcuses and van Kempen 2000

A

Contemp global society charach by temporal spatial & temporal porosity - enabled by interconnections and instantaneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tuathail 2000

A

States aren’t just faced with external but ^ingly internal sec threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cerny 2004

A

Alledged antagonists of WoT such as Al-Q charach by their global networks - crossing multiple boundaries, questioning enduring importance of Weber’s def

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dick Cheney

A

Some say states were easier targets - target state easier when targeting individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gregory 2004

A

Constructing the enemy - diff constructions of the enemy since 9/11 - Bush and allies constructed image of enemies as beyond regulation, reason and comprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Roy 2002

A

Attack on Afghanistan - is another act of terror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Barnett 2004

A

The Pentagon’s New Map

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cerny 2004

A

Revolt and TSM can be attributed to econ disconnection - thus serious sec threat. Can no longer label TSTs as stateless, when they are fully dep on regimes Reterritorialzing a deterritorialized threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Todd 2003

A

TSM as a virus that is swarming - omnipresent nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kaplan and Bristol 2003

A

Have long passed threshold where prospect of frag Iraq is ^ evil than persistence of Hussein - that things might be worse without him is of course a possibilty. but given the status quo in Iraq, it is difficult to imagine now

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elden 2007

A

Territorial aspect - spatial parameters of WoT been recognized but connection to T neglected. Connecting terror and terrorism. Viral and pervasive nature of TSM - with no pol or spatial limits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lefebvre 1972

A

Space as a locus and medium of struggle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Jeffrey 2009

A

Linking terror and territory supports embedded statism - unquestioned enduring nature of state and thus the primary protector o the borders within the WoT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Vincent 1974

A

Observance of a general rule of non-intervention can only be upheld so long as: internat society is comprised of predom sov states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Perle & Frum 2004

A

A gov that’ll not perform role of a gov forfeits rights of a gov. Thus neutral states have a responsib to intervene to protect stability of global comm - everything is for stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Giddens 1990

A

To be a human is to be an agent, and to be an agent is to have power - thus each indiv has inherent ‘transformative capacity’ entrenched within states and societies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Yannis 2002

A

Seccesssions groups exploit the territorial vacuum of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Hehir 2007

A

Failed state: gov fails to fulfill social contract & unable to ensure border preservation, thus losing control of their monopoly of legit force - adds territorial dimension to WoT and supports ‘embedded statism’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Jeffrey 2009

A

Encouraging good governance where TSTs and secessionists may operate - in contrast to aspatial narrative of our interdependent GBS world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Duffield 2001

A

Humanitarian intervention and neo-conservative narrative - new sec paradigm - devel-sec nexus

25
Q

Hehir 2007

A

Advocates of intervention combine moral & sec-orientated discourses

26
Q

Cerny 2004

A

Focusing on societal devel rather than simply militaristic and violent methods

27
Q

Brown 2010

A

Walled states, waning sovereignity

28
Q

Jones 2013

A

Border walls

29
Q

Gregory 2011

A

Where do you draw the line where WoT becomes a global one?

30
Q

Aphorism ‘one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter’ - highlights multiple ways vigilante of the war perceived

A

Ganor 2002

31
Q

State, nation, sovereignity - smith tries to think about 9/11 as a geog event - local, national, global

A

Smith 2002

32
Q

Local impact of 9/11

A

Gregory 2004

33
Q

Anonymous, imperial hubris - justifications of 9/11, US various occupations abroad e.g.

A

Scheuer 2005

34
Q

Contemp global society charach by temporal spatial & temporal porosity - enabled by interconnections and instantaneity

A

Marcuses and van Kempen 2000

35
Q

States aren’t just faced with external but ^ingly internal sec threats

A

Tuathail 2000

36
Q

Alledged antagonists of WoT such as Al-Q charach by their global networks - crossing multiple boundaries, questioning enduring importance of Weber’s def

A

Cerny 2004

37
Q

Some say states were easier targets - target state easier when targeting individual

A

Dick Cheney

38
Q

Constructing the enemy - diff constructions of the enemy since 9/11 - Bush and allies constructed image of enemies as beyond regulation, reason and comprehension

A

Gregory 2004

39
Q

Attack on Afghanistan - is another act of terror

A

Roy 2002

40
Q

The Pentagon’s New Map

A

Barnett 2004

41
Q

Revolt and TSM can be attributed to econ disconnection - thus serious sec threat. Can no longer label TSTs as stateless, when they are fully dep on regimes Reterritorialzing a deterritorialized threat

A

Cerny 2004

42
Q

TSM as a virus that is swarming - omnipresent nature

A

Todd 2003

43
Q

Have long passed threshold where prospect of frag Iraq is ^ evil than persistence of Hussein - that things might be worse without him is of course a possibilty. but given the status quo in Iraq, it is difficult to imagine now

A

Kaplan and Bristol 2003

44
Q

Territorial aspect - spatial parameters of WoT been recognized but connection to T neglected. Connecting terror and terrorism. Viral and pervasive nature of TSM - with no pol or spatial limits

A

Elden 2007

45
Q

Space as a locus and medium of struggle

A

Lefebvre 1972

46
Q

Linking terror and territory supports embedded statism - unquestioned enduring nature of state and thus the primary protector o the borders within the WoT

A

Jeffrey 2009

47
Q

Observance of a general rule of non-intervention can only be upheld so long as: internat society is comprised of predom sov states

A

Vincent 1974

48
Q

A gov that’ll not perform role of a gov forfeits rights of a gov. Thus neutral states have a responsib to intervene to protect stability of global comm - everything is for stability

A

Perle & Frum 2004

49
Q

To be a human is to be an agent, and to be an agent is to have power - thus each indiv has inherent ‘transformative capacity’ entrenched within states and societies

A

Giddens 1990

50
Q

Seccesssions groups exploit the territorial vacuum of power

A

Yannis 2002

51
Q

Failed state: gov fails to fulfill social contract & unable to ensure border preservation, thus losing control of their monopoly of legit force - adds territorial dimension to WoT and supports ‘embedded statism’

A

Hehir 2007

52
Q

Encouraging good governance where TSTs and secessionists may operate - in contrast to aspatial narrative of our interdependent GBS world

A

Jeffrey 2009

53
Q

Humanitarian intervention and neo-conservative narrative - new sec paradigm - devel-sec nexus

A

Duffield 2001

54
Q

Advocates of intervention combine moral & sec-orientated discourses

A

Hehir 2007

55
Q

Focusing on societal devel rather than simply militaristic and violent methods

A

Cerny 2004

56
Q

Walled states, waning sovereignity

A

Brown 2010

57
Q

Border walls

A

Jones 2013

58
Q

Where do you draw the line where WoT becomes a global one?

A

Gregory 2011

Political (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions